Thane Heins Perepiteia.

[OilBarren]

Thane, the communication difficulty here is that you are using the word "loading" in a different way. When these folks (and me too) talk about demonstrating the machine under load, what they/we we mean is a physical load into which you are supplying mechanical power. The purpose of that would be to show that the machine can actually supply mechanical power externally, and not simply consume all its power as heat in its own windings. Showing that you can bleed off a very small amount of electrical power to light a bulb does not demonstrate mechanical power output.

PLEASE POST YOUR REAL NAME,  REAL HOME ADDRESS AND REAL HOME PHONE NUMBER - AS I HAVE HAVE DONE... SO I CAN BE SURE WHAT IDIOT I AM RESPONDING TO.

THANKS
Thane

[OilBarren]

ATTACHMNET: Test Data May 4th, 2008 - Full Speed Test
Could you clarify which motor ... and which rotor...  was used in these tests, please?
Thanks,
Ron

RON,

I USED THE EXACT SET UP SHOWN HERE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7PBavkMGwI
BUT REPLACED THE LIGHT BULBS WITH RESISTORS.
- TWO MICROWAVE TRANSFORMERS TRIMMED DOWN AND SECURED TOGETHER.
6 x 2 MAGNETS ON THE STEEL WHEEL.

Thane

[OUman]

DEAR EVERYONE  (who is not crazy),

I AM REPOSTING THIS DATA BECAUSE I THINK IT BEARS REPEATING.

THE NO LOAD OPERATION IS IN BLACK

THE HIGH CURRENT LOADING AND DECELERATION IS IN RED.
TAKE NOTE OF HOW THE MOTOR DRAWS VIRTUALLY THE SAME AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL POWER THAT IS DISSIPATED IN THE LOAD.

WHEN THE HIGH VOLTAGE COILS ARE ENGAGED (GREEN) THE MOTOR DRAWS LESS POWER THAN THE NO LOAD SCENARIO, ACCELERATES BEYOND NO LOAD SPEED AND DELIVERS POWER TO A LOAD.

FOR ANYONE WHO IS NOT COMPLETELY MAD ? THIS SHOULD BE VIEWED AS SERIOUSLY COOL.

Thane

ATTACHMNET: Test Data May 4th, 2008 - Full Speed Test

Here is a version of the table with the efficiencies calculated:

[OilBarren]

ATTACHMNET: Test Data May 4th, 2008 - Full Speed Test
Here is a version of the table with the efficiencies calculated:

WOW! YOU CERTAINLY WENT THROUGH AN AWFUL LOT OF TROUBLE TO SHOW 52,000 PEOPLE HOW IGNORANT YOU ARE AND THAT YOU DON'T KNOW HOW TO CALCULATE EFFICIENCIES?

FOR EXAMPLE:

TABLE 1

IT TAKES 135 W TO PRODUCE 4.87 W THROUGH THE 100 ohm LOAD WITH THE HIGH CURRENT COILS ONLY.

BUT IT ONLY TAKES 121 W TO PRODUCE 2.13 W FROM THE SAME COILS - THROUGH THE SAME LOAD WITH THE HIGH VOLTAGE COILS SHORTED.

YOU DID NOT ACCOUNT FOR THE 8 W REDUCTION IN MOTOR INPUT
- YOU IDIOTICALLY ONLY LOOKED AT THE OUTPUT.

NOW I CAN SEE WHY YOU PERSIST AT KEEPING YOUR IDENTITY A SECRET.

Thane

[OilBarren]

IN ADDITION, GENERATOR EFFICIENCY IS ALWAYS CALCULATED AT THE DRIVE SHAFT SIDE ENTERING THE GENERATOR NOT AT THE PRIME MOVER SIDE BECAUSE A GASOLINE ENGINE AS A PRIME MOVER HAS AN EFFICIENCY OF 20 - 30 %.

SO IF WE LOOK AT THE DRIVE SHAFT POWER = SPEED (RPM) / TORQUE IN THE ABOVE TABLE WE SEE SOME VERY INTERESTING THINGS.

THE HIGH VOLTAGE COILS ADD TO THE DRIVE SHAFT TORQUE WITH COMPLEMENTARY TORQUE BECAUSE THE DRIVE SHAFT POWER ACTUALLY DECREASES WHILE DELIVERING POWER TO A LOAD

WHEREAS PREVIOUSLY THE DRIVE SHAFT POWER INCREASED TO COMPENSATE FOR THE HIGH CURRENT COUNTER TORQUE REQUIREMENTS.

SO IN REALITY THE PRIME MOVER POWER HAS NO SIGNIFICANCE AT ALL IN ANY EVALUATION EVER - WHAT IS OF INTEREST IS WHAT HAPPENS TO THE DRIVE SHAFT POWER, WHAT CAUSES IT TO CHANGE AND WHY.

SO, DON'T BE MISLED BY CON ARTISTS AND LIARS.

Thane