Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Thane Heins Perepiteia.

Started by RunningBare, February 04, 2008, 09:02:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 30 Guests are viewing this topic.

CRANKYpants

Quote from: adjust on July 26, 2008, 05:33:49 AM
Hi Adam

you can find all patent pages and updates about Thans Heins at my hubpage

http://hubpages.com/hub/The-full-patent-blueprint--Perepiteia-motor

You can rightclick and download the full new patent page by page,

or mail me at

Info.adjust@gmail.com and I will send you the pdf
 
I try to put the pages in a video at you tube but the file was too big. :'(

But i upload a video at youtube with a direct ling to the page with the new patent photos ::)
the name of the video is:   NEW 2008 !!! PEREPITEIA MOTOR THE FULL PATENT BLUEPRINTS

Thanks for your support

Adjust


DEAR ADJUST,

YOU HAVE A TYPO - HOLY GRAY - SHOULD READ HOLY GRAIL.
ALSO THOSE PATENTS ARE NOW PRETTY MUCH OUT OF DATE.
YOU OUGHT TO UPDATE YOUR INFO WITH OUR NEW COIL DESIGN AND LINKS TO THE MAY AND JUNE GENERATOR VIDEOS AT OTTAWA UNIVERSITY.

ONE FINAL THING - I WOULD SUGGEST YOU CALL IT THE "PEREPITEIA GENERATOR" SINCE THAT IS WHAT I CONSIDER IT TO BE BUT OF COURSE IT IS UP TO YOU.

CHEERS
Thane

JustMe


alan

Have you also tried pulsed DC?

Maybe it gives a clearer result if a known quantity of current is put in the device, for instance:
Capacitor -> charge pump -> opamp sine generator -> sine voltage
Just a thought, keep up the good work.

CRANKYpants

Quote from: alan on July 26, 2008, 10:47:09 AM
Have you also tried pulsed DC?

Maybe it gives a clearer result if a known quantity of current is put in the device, for instance:
Capacitor -> charge pump -> opamp sine generator -> sine voltage
Just a thought, keep up the good work.


I AM NOT SURE HOW MUCH CLEARER YOU WANT IT?
WHEN I DOUBLE CHECKED THE METER LOAD CURRENT WITH THE SAME METER (BECAUSE I COULD NOT BELIVE WHAT I WAS SEEING) - THE METER SHOWED 0.086 A AND THE CALCULATED LOAD CURRENT IS:

Ir = 8.57 / 100.5
Ir = 85.3 mA

GOTOLUC HAS BEEN USING THIS METER FOR QUITE A WHILE AND I AM SURE HE CAN VOUCH FOR ITS ACCURACY.

NEVERTHELESS ALL THIS MUST BE VETTED BY THE UNIVERSITY SO IT MAY ALL BE IN ERROR - WE WILL SEE?

I AM TAKING A LITTLE VACATION UNTIL THEN.

(PLEASE FORGIVE MY "SPOOK-O-METER" BUT SUGGESTING THAT THERE IS AN UN-"known quantity of current" IS A TYPICAL SPOOKISH TACTIC OF CREATING DOUBT WHERE NO DOUBT EXISTS AS IS SUGGESTING ALTERNATE CONVOLUTED TESTS TO MAKE THINGS "CLEAR" WHEN A SIMPLE APPLICATION OF OHMS LAW WILL SUFFICE).

CHEERS
Thane

gyulasun

Quote from: CRANKYpants on July 26, 2008, 11:06:13 AM
I AM NOT SURE HOW MUCH CLEARER YOU WANT IT?
WHEN I DOUBLE CHECKED THE METER LOAD CURRENT WITH THE SAME METER (BECAUSE I COULD NOT BELIVE WHAT I WAS SEEING) - THE METER SHOWED 0.086 A AND THE CALCULATED LOAD CURRENT IS:

Ir = 8.57 / 100.5
Ir = 8.53 mA

GOTOLUC HAS BEEN USING THIS METER FOR QUITE A WHILE AND I AM SURE HE CAN VOUCH FOR ITS ACCURACY.


HI Thane,

Sorry to draw your attention to a typo but 8.57 / 100.5 = 0.0853 A  and it is 85.3mA,  not 8.53mA,  right?  This nicely corresponds to your measured 0.086A (which is 86mA).

Thanks,  Gyula