Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Thane Heins Perepiteia.

Started by RunningBare, February 04, 2008, 09:02:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 55 Guests are viewing this topic.

CRANKYpants

Quote from: gyulasun on July 26, 2008, 11:34:04 AM
HI Thane,

Sorry to draw your attention to a typo but 8.57 / 100.5 = 0.0853 A  and it is 85.3mA,  not 8.53mA,  right?  This nicely corresponds to your measured 0.086A (which is 86mA).

Thanks,  Gyula

GOT IT! :P
THANKS
Thane

alan

I'm talking about the input.
Output is double checked and does seem correct, I only suggested a method to double check the input.
Input a known charge quantity or input current limiter, so nothing passes by unnoticed.
I wouldn't rely only on an amp meter using inductance, while the whole device is based on inductance and shows OU.
Don't need it to be any clearer, just sharing my ideas. 

Good luck monday when you present it at U.

If you really have achieved OU, then 1 should be able to run 10 of these. Just need to transform the voltage to 38V again.

CRANKYpants

Quote from: alan on July 26, 2008, 11:50:01 AM
I'm talking about the input.
Output is double checked and does seem correct, I only suggested a method to double check the input.
Input a known charge quantity or input current limiter, so nothing passes by unnoticed.
I wouldn't rely only on an amp meter using inductance, while the whole device is based on inductance and shows OU.
Don't need it to be any clearer, just sharing my ideas. 

Good luck monday when you present it at U.

I WILL DOUBLE CHECK THE INPUT CURRENT WITH THE OSCILLOSCOPE.

IN SOME PREVIOUS PHOTOS YOU MAY HAVE SEEN A POWER ANALYZER WHICH I WAS ALSO USING FOR THIS TEST - ITS CURRENT READING WAS 0.00 A AND IT CANNOT READ TO THE THIRD DECIMAL - IF THE INPUT CURRENT WAS EQUAL TO OR ABOVE 0.005 THE METER WOULD HAVE READ IT AS 0.01 A BUT IT DID NOT.

AGAIN IT TOOK ME A LONG TIME TO BELIEVE THAT THE CURRENT WOULD BE SO LOW - BUT WHEN YOU CONSIDER THE SIZE OF THE SECONDARY CORE AND THE FACT THAT THE PRIMARY IS ALREADY BEGINNING TO SATURATE (YOU CAN SEE ON THE SCOPE HOW THE CURRENT WAVEFORM IS ALREADY A LITTLE FUNKY) - HOW AND WHY WOULD SECONDARY BACK EMF FLUX MAKE IT BACK TO THE PRIMARY UNDER THESE CONDITIONS?

THANKS
Thane

gyulasun

Quote from: JustMe on July 26, 2008, 10:23:11 AM
Photos! :)

Hi JustMe,

Stefan increased the size of the uploadable photos from 50kB to 100kB a few weeks ago.  I mention this so that you may not have to fiddle to much with the photos to downsize them below 50kB and the picture quality can remain even better.  (Not that quality is a problem with the 50kB limit, you do an excellent job!)

( http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4207.msg103973.html#msg103973 )

Thanks,  Gyula

nul-points

hi Thane

very encouraging to see these latest developments on the bi-toroid Xfr!

i was experimenting with multi-toroids a year or so ago, inspired by the Jensen 'Uni-Directional Transformer', and although i was able to get regular transformer action, i didn't see any evidence of avoiding Lenz effects

i'm attaching a couple of pics of my xfr (tri-former, as i called it) - the toroids are approx 1.25" OD, primary is approx 200 turns of approx .2mm mag wire, two secondaries give approx 1:1 offload (when connected in series)

in your opinion, what are the key elements to achieve the Lenz-less type operation?
-  scale up to greater turns & current operation?
-  move from pulsed DC to Sine waveforms?
-  take outputs from secondaries and rectify separately, rather than series? (so that secondary back-emfs oppose each other)
-  use different cores?

any pointers much appreciated!

keep up the good work - all the best with the presentation
sandy

Doc Ringwood's Free Energy site  http://ringcomps.co.uk/doc

"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra