Thane Heins Perepiteia.

[i_ron]

In fact, you seen us in Geico commercials.
BTW, I'm the handsome one. The other two are butt ugly. Also, I am the only one of us with a Doctorate in Gibberation from Cave Tech U

Regards, Larry

BUTT, when we wash our faces and comb our hair you can see our hearts of gold...

Ron

[allcanadian]

@Crankypants

HEY AC - START BY GIVING US YOUR LEARNED OPINION ON MY "HOW GENERATOR HIGH VOLTAGE COILS CAUSE ACCELERATION" EXPLANATION. 
NOBODY HAS CHALLENGED ME YET - WHICH IS NO FUN AT ALL..

Your explanation posted prior to my last one ,

HOW GENERATOR HIGH VOLTAGE COILS CAUSE ACCELERATION

, has it pretty much covered. Simply put, if induced energy can be stored in a form(capacitance) which cannot be effected by the energy state which induced it then transformed into a form that can (current) we have a one way reaction. Below is a patent I have tested which works in a similar way(Robert Alexander:self-sustaining generator at rexresearch.com), LOL the coil orientation is what throws everyone off track. Notice the coils should be wrapped on an armature core not shown and this armature core is energized at or near the bloch wall of the PM stator field as depicted by the orientation of the commutator brushes.The primaries are energized in a neutral field which makes the armature a transformer and the PM field will produce a force on the armature but cannot induce a current in it----one way reaction. The armature accelerates due to this primary force and a current is induced in the high voltage secondaries by the stator PM's in which case it is a generator. Motor/transformer/generator in that order twice per revolution but in this case all of what constitutes the input in the primaries is added to the output of the generated current in the secondaries. I am not sure what the exact setup is that you are using at the present date but any input energy must become an output for efficient operation as well as any generated energy regardless of what form it may take.
Regards
AC

[CRANKYpants]

AND BUTT BUT NOT LEAST...

[iflewmyown]

Cranky, I have watched this ongoing experiment with great interest. It was my greatest hope that this was leading somewhere, and it might still, however I will ask the question no one else will. Your output compared to input sucks and I am wondering if there is data somewhere that shows a gain over normal efficiency of a normal generator. Just now in the shop I belted together two DC treadmill motors and clamped them to a table saw. The motor pulled 1.03 amps at 12.30 volts while driving the other one loaded as a generator. The load was the first 10 ohm resistor on the bench. The output was 3.94 volts at 1.24 amps. This was not meant to be an exhaustive study but did confirm for me that your efficiency is way way down. My generator with mismatched load is 38% efficient while in the California data you show .25% efficiency for your normal generator and 1.45% efficiency for the lenzless version. Cranky you asked one time how to enhance your presentation for companies coming to visit. You should start with a 95% efficient generator as a baseline and increase the efficiency and accelerate yours to beat it. If I have missed something I apologize.

[CRANKYpants]

ALL KIDDING ASSIDE...PLANS, DATA, VIDEOS ETC CAN BE FOUND HERE:

REPLY # 's
2947
2950
2951
2958
2964
2972

& YOUTUBE VIDEOS"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmFbINO0dCU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vruf7s9PaA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3X5FvSVdf58

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYC0X5AP5Y4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsBMPZimzoU

T