Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Thane Heins Perepiteia.

Started by RunningBare, February 04, 2008, 09:02:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 118 Guests are viewing this topic.

Coleston

Quote from: CRANKYpants on March 12, 2009, 07:10:16 AM

The mounting face of the enclosure has to be reinforced before we can close the air gap. I think 100 watts / coil is do-able.



From what I saw this is an insanely important step, eh? 100 watts is promising, but is that the low speed output?


5x jump from 20 watts I would think you would need to increase the RPM's and decrease the airgap.

With the 3 magnets configuration instead of the 1 magnet configuration how much gain is that going to provide?

Whats the limiting factor in coil o/p power? Heat?

I was doing some sums with some buds last night, and we figured we could fit 6 connected 12" diameter rotors in the space where the driveshaft used to be, I think we could just squeeze 8 coils in per side, so 8 x 2 x 6 = 96 coils,

96 coils at 100 watts = 9600 watts so almost 10Kw output. If input lowering remains true then who knows how low the input energy would need to be.

9600 watts / 746 = 12.9 so 13 HP.

Larger rotors might be needed, but 13 hp would be agreat start.


And furthermore, using the power harvesting coils as non - continuous duty cycle may allow us to harvest huge amounts more. IE overrev the hell out of the motor, dump a massive coil melting amount of power into the wheels, accelerate up to speed then coast while the engine cools down, then 13 HP is more than enough to maintain 100KPH+ on flat ground, until you need to accel or climb a hill in which case you over rev the motor again and repeat the process.

Also, if you get a free second do you think you could fire me off the dimensions of the coils and magnets you are using, I want to try some ideas in Sketch Up. Cheers

Coleston

Quote from: hydrocontrol on March 11, 2009, 08:39:03 AM


http://pesn.com/2009/03/11/9501531_Boswell_windless_turbine/
"Boswell Power Production Unit Runs Continuously Even Without Wind"




Hmm, has anyone seen one of these things built? Installed? Running? Working?

Coleston

This is interesting too, new cathode material for LiIonPho batteries which allows charge and discharge characteristics equivalent to ultracapacitors.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/11/nyregion/11about.html?_r=3 And since the power density is 3x ultracaps, goodbye ultra caps.

hydrocontrol

Quote from: Coleston on March 12, 2009, 09:41:45 AM
This is interesting too, new cathode material for LiIonPho batteries which allows charge and discharge characteristics equivalent to ultracapacitors.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/11/nyregion/11about.html?_r=3 And since the power density is 3x ultracaps, goodbye ultra caps.

Your link had nothing to do with batteries or ultracapacitors.
Do you have a valid link ?

Maybe you meant this link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/11/business/yourmoney/11stream.html?scp=4&sq=new%20batteries&st=cse

Coleston

Quote from: hydrocontrol on March 12, 2009, 04:51:27 PM
Your link had nothing to do with batteries or ultracapacitors.
Do you have a valid link ?

Maybe you meant this link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/11/business/yourmoney/11stream.html?scp=4&sq=new%20batteries&st=cse


omg ahahahhaa, what a blunder, lol. Thats what I get for having 10,000 tabs.

The article you mentioned is not the right one either,

http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/22280/

thats the right one