Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Thane Heins Perepiteia.

Started by RunningBare, February 04, 2008, 09:02:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

aether22

Note: before I fell asleep I thought of some stuff I missed, it has been added above with red 'updates'.

It is also worth noting that when it come to agitation of the aether by using things such as orgonite (as well as the reflective structure in orgone accumulators and Joe cells) there are tons of other examples such as earth energy (soil), Mesmer (a tub of water, iron filings and glass shavings) and even utterly different things such as the vanes in magnetrons and even parallel electrical circuits. (a guy made multiple parallel amplifier circuits and found it added a 'richness' to the circuit which was then recombined inductively, but he found that if he added a 13th transistor it would blow and on hollowing it out the silicon would have vanished. (can be found by searching Keelynet/Jerry Decker)

I have at times called the effect multiple or cellular resonance but that was before I understood it and only had the observation that these material created orgone. (even before I understood what orgone was)

What I have presented is not a theory and I have not heard anyone else express it, it is generally not in agreement of how the inventors thought their experiments to work but it is what is evident if you look.
It makes sense of things in a way that leaves me even the possibility of questioning the reality of what is revealing it's self, I can not however show anyone else all the evidence as it's a decade long journey but rest assured if you look understand what I have presented and apply it to various anomalies, especially Free Energy and Antigravity devices you will see it explains most any devices operation no matter if it is from 100 years ago or discovered a week from now.

What has tortured me is the fact that most of these devices are 'unintentional hybrids' meaning they work on a conventional level they were designed for but also on an aetheric level which has been 'lucked into' and the latter can be broken by the craziest things, but no more evidence need be given of that than the shaft coupling required by Thanes device.
But sometimes it is far far more subtle stuff such as location, details of operation, energy from experimenter etc...

This is the first time a device has been robust and replicated, acceptably detailed, clear in it's function and how to proceed, clear in it's ability to effect the aether and to respond to that effect.
I can show you an almost endless number of devices but there is one thing or another that stands in the way of it being an idea or acceptable testbed.

I am very happy to note that I have not on list anyway received any laughter or attacks, and while I made my 'peace' with the concept of the aether long long ago I am still acutely aware of how this sounds to many people since I have a very conventional skeptical scientist in my head telling me so.

Anyway I hope at least some found my disclosure interesting.



?To forgive is to set a prisoner free and then discover that the prisoner was you.?  Lewis Smedes

JustMe

I found your info very interesting Aether22. Thanks - clearly that was LOTS of typing.

Odd you tried to vaporize your own mother with a generator. That's legal in New Zealand, eh?

aether22

Quote from: JustMe on March 25, 2008, 02:55:01 PM
Quote from: polarbreeze on March 25, 2008, 01:08:09 AM
ADDED: The result will be something like this link http://polk-burnett.apogee.net/pd/dmcs.asp - note that at low rpm it's absolutely normal for torque and speed to rise while current falls. I think we can conclude that the device is simply a magnetic brake after all.

Thane has spoken more than once about induction motors having the property of requiring less and less power as they accelerate, so I don't think this is new. His affect initiates acceleration from a steady RPM, something that would intuitively seem to need at least a temporary bump in input - or the release of a braking affect, as you and others have pointed out. I find your conclusion, and what seems to be an implication that there is no value in the affect, premature.

Basically the faster they rotate the less current they draw and the less torque they output.
You can't drop the input and get more torque and speed out of a motor unless you are changing some other part of the equation such as reducing losses.

Quote from: JustMe on March 25, 2008, 03:04:56 PM
Can someone tell me if the terms "hysteresis brake" and "magnetic brake" are synonymous as they are used on this thread?

That depends on who is talking I would imagine, there are of course 2 different breaking effects, hysteresis and Lenz Law (eddy currents or intentional induction)
But hysteresis MAY be imagined to be greater.  Also cogging may be included by some people.

Quote
Odd you tried to vaporize your own mother with a generator. That's legal in New Zealand, eh?
In a small country like this, anything goes ;)


Thane, can you give me the tracking number?
Also were the 2 addresses put on it as I asked?
Maybe answer in PM?   Thanks.
?To forgive is to set a prisoner free and then discover that the prisoner was you.?  Lewis Smedes

Mr.Entropy

Quote from: aether22 on March 25, 2008, 03:13:23 PM
I am very happy to note that I have not on list anyway received any laughter or attacks, and while I made my 'peace' with the concept of the aether long long ago I am still acutely aware of how this sounds to many people since I have a very conventional skeptical scientist in my head telling me so.

Well, this is overunity.com, and half the people here have ideas that sound crazier than yours.

Tell me, though:  Do you have mathematical expressions for any "aetheric" laws that could be used to predict the behaviour of physical systems?

Thanks,

Mr. Entropy

aether22

Not managed to resolve things to such a fine point yet because due to the means of discovery of the aether i have started with a very very fuzzy picture which has slowly resolved finer detail, but because I have resisted theorizing I can not go beyond the almost mosaic like picture that forms.

Also the aether may well resist such standard quantification, although after having said that the noble prize winning physicist I mentioned was able to create equations.

It is in it's nature highly nonlinear.
?To forgive is to set a prisoner free and then discover that the prisoner was you.?  Lewis Smedes