Tri-Force Magnets - Finally shown to be OU?

[Omnibus]

@omni,

so the hand no longer has anything to do with smot?  why don't you show that?

lol
sam

ps: over on a smot thread!!!

Go away. Your nonsense isn't needed here (and anywhere else for that matter).

[Yadaraf]

@Yadaraf,

I strongly disagree. As you probably know I have proven conclusively that there is OU (violation of CoE) exactly according to the definition you gave above. Therefore, my thinking regarding a somewhat more practical device than the SMOT which is the pmm is entirely along these lines.

I don't see the concrete mechanism as to how this continuous spin might happen due to the interaction with the geophysical factors other than expressing certain intuition, as you do. It may be also interesting and it may also be OU but it seems more far fetched than the already established possibility for violating CoE and applying it to build a pmm. So far there isn't any inkling whatsoever for a possibility geophysical factors to participate in driving a device such as that of @alsetalokin. As of this moment @alsetalokin's device should be considered as nothing else but a hoax.

Omni,

Because you have not measured energy from higher dimensions (4D, 5D, etc) you have not proven OU.  Your device might simply be exhibiting "3D OU", because it is converting 4D or 5D energies into 3D.

Remember, please, that voltmeters, scales, etc. are only 3D instruments that are good for measuring 3D phenomenon.  3D creatures made these simple instruments to rationalize their 3D experience and satisfy their egos.  The CERN LHC is another story.

Concerning CoE, it, too, must be consider in hyperdimensional context.  Most discussions of CoE are really Co3DE, and this is a problem.

Concerning Al's device, the objective data can be used to support the hypothesis that Al's device was possibly influenced by SR modes 1 & 2.  In order to promote the hypothesis to a theory, however, replication is needed.  (See Steve Mark's work.)


Cheers

Yada..
.

[Omnibus]

@Yadaraf,

The violation of CoE discovered is shockingly simple. There's nothing esoteric about it, no speculations about spaces and unknown energy conversions. I know it's sounds like fun and appears very elevated to make esoteric speculations but the reality is pretty plain, although with far-reaching consequences. Unfortunately, however, so far there hasn't been apparent way to harness that simple existing violation of CoE in a somewhat more practical device, producing the excess energy continuously. The discontinuous production of excess energy discovered so far is obtained in such a form which is complicated to feed into the input to make the device self-sustaining. Of course, there can be practical ways to utilize for practical purposes this excess energy obtained for free, although discontinuously. The obviously beneficial practical application of such potential technologies exclude self-sustaining run but it still is a free lunch. As I already said, the psychology of people is somehow set to only accept excess energy if it is produced continuously. That's pure psychology and stiff way of thinking, nothing else. Add to it the interests of powerful forces with conservative, reactionary agendas and we can see why we're here, facing a total crisis of society. I'm not far from the though that, for instance, Tokamaks are deliberately held back because there are powerful forces feeding on the system as it is now. These forces need the "progress" to be only in the direction that suits them pushing in oblivion everything really innovative that can threaten their governance.  Look at the OU. It has been known to be real for centuries (despite the vigorous propaganda asserting otherwise). The SMOT we're talking about has been put forth hundreds of years ago by Taisnierius, Others have had working OU machines as well--completely shunned with a forceful deliberation by the powers that be.

Anyway, that's the situation we're facing and one serious psychological threshold which can be crossed which the powers that be can hardly shun (especially with the advance of the net) is to create a self-sustaining device. That has no other meaning regarding the violation of CoE than psychological, I won't stop repeating that. If that cannot be accomplished I'm afraid OU, no matter how real, will remain just a curiosity among the honest brighter people around.

[Omnibus]

@alsetalokin's device is a non-issue and there's no reason to continue with it. That will remain as one of the sad episodes in the search for a self-sustaining pmm.

[konduct]

Omnibus is such an asshole.