Tri-Force Magnets - Finally shown to be OU?

[sm0ky2]

im not talking about the magnetic potential, im talking about the gravitational potential, which is an independent field.

we're talking about 9 cm in the verticle direction.

why is that not on the level surface below??

are you starting to see this missing piece of your puzzle now?

[Omnibus]

im not talking about the magnetic potential, im talking about the gravitational potential, which is an independent field.

we're talking about 9 cm in the verticle direction.

why is that not on the level surface below??

are you starting to see this missing piece of your puzzle now?

\

Read carefully what I write and think before posting.

[zerotensor]

OK, I see fortunecity.com behaves funny. Here's a link to the actual experiment: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5163427245750490858&q=magnetic_propulsor

Thanks for the link.

OK, I have seen this one.  Here's my analysis:

We start with the ball at point B.  We let it go, and it goes zooming off, whips around, and ends up at point A.  Point A is directly below point B.  Agree so far?

The fact that it zooms and whirs and interacts with a magnetic field (which is not static, by the way, since the very reason that the ball moves is because it distorts the field lines), is impressive, but in the end...

The ball has fallen several inchescm.  Game over.

Get the ball to return to the starting point <edit: or demonstrate work> and I'll be impressed.  Until then, all you have is a fancy roller coaster.

[Omnibus]

.

[Omnibus]

We start with the ball at point B.  We let it go, and it goes zooming off, whips around, and ends up at point A.  Point A is directly below point B.  Agree so far?

No, I don?t agree. Watch the video once again. We start with the ball at A, not at B, as you're trying to finagle.

You have understood the experiment incorrectly and that confuses you and causes you to write the rest of the post which makes no sense.

Give it another try.