The secret of a working perpetual motion gravity powered device

[gurangax]

This is the 2nd part

[gurangax]

This is the 3rd part

[gurangax]

This is the last part.

-regards-
Charles

[wattsup]

@gurangax

Thanks for your document which I have reviewed. After review, I still do not see this working regardless of chains on the weights attached at the axle, with levers or sliders. All of these will consume energy through friction. This energy is not available from the left side even if the left top ball is farthest out, it is not enough.

The main flaw in the design is by turning counterclockwise, there will always have at one time or another two balls on the right side of the working center line, and this alone will kill it. Trying to lift the weight will create more countering.

I encourage others to first make drawings showing the wheel at ever 2 degrees, placing the weights in their respective positions and calculating if at each 2 degree there is always an imbalance favoring the direction of rotation. If there is one of the 2 degrees that does not favor this, then this single point will slowly eat away at the momentum until it stops.

But in all these designs, the inventor will see things that others will not and only when you have made your design will you realize it. So I do encourage you to make the wheel and see for yourself. This IS the best way to learn.

However, your indication of 3, 6, 9 is interesting and deserves some study, simply for the use of odd numbers in motion. I will look into it in my design and if it passes the 2 degree test, I could consider it.

All the best.

[gurangax]

@gurangax

Thanks for your document which I have reviewed. After review, I still do not see this working regardless of chains on the weights attached at the axle, with levers or sliders. All of these will consume energy through friction. This energy is not available from the left side even if the left top ball is farthest out, it is not enough.

The main flaw in the design is by turning counterclockwise, there will always have at one time or another two balls on the right side of the working center line, and this alone will kill it. Trying to lift the weight will create more countering.

I encourage others to first make drawings showing the wheel at ever 2 degrees, placing the weights in their respective positions and calculating if at each 2 degree there is always an imbalance favoring the direction of rotation. If there is one of the 2 degrees that does not favor this, then this single point will slowly eat away at the momentum until it stops.

But in all these designs, the inventor will see things that others will not and only when you have made your design will you realize it. So I do encourage you to make the wheel and see for yourself. This IS the best way to learn.

However, your indication of 3, 6, 9 is interesting and deserves some study, simply for the use of odd numbers in motion. I will look into it in my design and if it passes the 2 degree test, I could consider it.

All the best.

Hi wattsup

I'll prove the device works as stated. (do you know how torque works??)

-regards-

p.s see ya all in a maximum of 4 months (after I build the device).