Complete information on working SM style device.

[poynt99]

spherics is saying that the collector and control (kicker) coils are reversed comparing his and SM's, and that the kicker coils are bifilar solenoids oriented inward and not part of a toroid config.

The bifilar coil was for an experiment meant to demonstrate a concept.  I do not think it was meant to be a part of Spheric's TPU.  The positions of the 4 coils, and the interaction of the pulses provide the same effect as the bifilar experiment, but in a controlled manner where the energy can be collected.

Basically, as I see it, the top coil pairs up with each of the 3 control coils and takes the place of the bifilar windings.

i agree with you that the bifilar may not be part of spherics' design, i don't think he was clear on that, but my point was not that, it was what happened to the horizontal collector coil, and in general the whole configuration? Read my post again.

[mfred68]

I agree with you Nomen luni
that a lot of this could quite easily be fraudelant claims, and i am skeptikal about it all, but theres this little voice inside me that keeps urging me to look into this deeper, its mainly because i want this to be true, but so much dos'nt add up, like why would SM use a gigsaw to cut a chunk out of the side of his large tpu? he is effectivly destroing a one of a kind, and if it was to proove what its made of, would it not have been better to dimantle it in reverse order? and if it was such a major breakthrough in science in the first place, why is he filming it in a very amature way and with the video being 10 years or so old, it kind of makes me wonder if it is a hoax, but as i said, i want it to be true so im still waiting for positive answers, but if we all have to wait a life time to get these answers, they would be virtually useless for our enjoiment if we are already so old with not much time left, (at least future generations can benefit) but we want answers now.

If OU was really a possability and a prooven fact, why is everything still at experimental levels? should we not be starting to see scematics that work, and kits of parts that build a working product, better still finnished ou generators for sale!

forgive me everyone for sounding negative, but i have only just joined OU.com and have read 100's of pages, but i have yet to see a finnished ou item that works, have i missed it somewhere, is there anyone who has acturally created an OU generator, TPU or otherwise that is prooven to work?

I have bought several reels of magnet wire and magnets in the hope to build my own ou device, this was before i discoverd this site, but now that im here, im more interested in the TPU and i have constructed the coils earlier today, but i kind of lost faith after assembling them and then being stuck as to how to wire them up as SM did his, but i guess thats nothing new to you lot as you are also struggling along just like me, i really hope this is not a hoax, it could be an expensive "all for nothing " project, but i live in hope!

[hakware]

I think its entirely possible to use undertones of the NMR frequency to get the same results without having to inject 640Mhz or more into these coils, which is a difficult task to say the least and would require the use of tubes to get the voltages mentioned +300V to drive them.

the NMR frequency is said to be 3.23 if hydrogen is 100Mhz so there would be 323Mhz if you use 323Khz its 1000th harmonic would be the advertised NMR of iorn.

this site seems to provide some clues as to what you can expect when calculating frequencies and the NMR of an element

http://www.nyu.edu/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/aj39/NMRmap.cgi

[aleks]

http://www.nyu.edu/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/aj39/NMRmap.cgi

This one shows quite opposite. For 400MHz proton freq it shows  12.951MHz for iron.

[ecc]

Is the1OO MHz quoted as a NMR frequency value for Hydrogen truly its frequency or is this an arbitrary value? The latter would suggest that the true frequency for iron could be something else as the suggested 3.23 MHz or
1.3815 v/MHz or whatever. Are there other things to consider?

If so, what is then  the real frequency which would give a field representation of iron in that rotating vortex? And what would be a promising hamonic (2,3,6,9,  sub harmonic?) to that frequency?
Is there anyone here who can shine an educated light on these matters?

Thanks
ecc