Steven Mark´s associate Jack Durban comes forward with more info !

[turbo]

Of course, I'll still be interested to see what comes out of the radio show, but I'm not convinced.

Why don't you first listen to the show and then respond?

I am convinced.

M.

[EMdevices]

...This is done by attacking me rather then the demonstration as viewed in
the video tapes.
That is because most of the demonstrations I gave were to engineers and
scientists who confirmed the validity of the power generated by my
technology.

I found the secret when I read in some books about electron
tubes.

I would like to point out that there have been many, many large offers for
me, my technology the company, you name it.


Keep an open mind folks and don't jump to conclusions just yet.

EM

[wattsup]

@Earl

If those chokes were so common and everyday, then my question is, what's the point of putting a magnet next to it. I have done that with common chokes and there is nothing going on. So this would show the magnet ruse. What I would like to know by asking the question is are these toroids so amazingly different from others that make them receptive to a magnet.

@bolt

The point is the TPU was producing a minimum of 800-1000 watts of juiceroni. Getting your mosfets and driver and all the other ancillary control circuitry that you would require is such a confined space to handle 1000 watts of power of at least 1 amp is pretty serious and I just cannot fathom controlling 3 frequencies, capturing any feedback at 1000 watts, in such a small box just does not make sense. Now if the control was simply pulsing DC here and there, then I would agree, but to describe the function of a TPU will require the control for that function and I just can't see it fitting in that box.

Example: @Honk who I would consider as being a top notch EEer made a circuit for JackH and it was at least twice the size handling only 1/3 of the power, and it blew. So the question is why don't all these analogies fit inside this small black box. The only answer that fits is that it was not doing all these things. The function was much simpler then we think, so simple that any inkling of the function would have given it away, and hence all these stories.

[nightlife]

giantkiller, thank you for that link and I too am very curious of what Jack has to say. I am hoping that Tesla's patent is mentioned as well as its relevance to Steve Marks device.

I have been thinking real hard about this and after reviewing Tesla's patent dates and the patents that were submitted, I am a very firm believer that Steve's TPU is the same and it is and or is close to what I think it is based on what I find Tesla's patent to be.

It was said to only run for about 20 minutes because it gets to hot. I am thinking that it would get hot but that also the capacitors used should only last about 20 minutes based on the size they have to be. Tesla's device used the back EMF from the pulsing action which we all know, adds to the life of the power source used by redirecting it back to the power source.
You would be very surprised on how many actually know of a back EMF and the advantages of utilizing it. It all the videos I have watched, not once was the question of a back EMF being used.

My question to Jack would be, is there any capacitors and is the back EMF being utilized? Another question should be if the capacitors are recharged?
I have a feeling he doesn't know this because it was said that he actually never seen the device taken apart. If he cant answer any of those questions positively, then he is no help to us other then to help steer us in the wrong direction.

Tesla's U.S. Patent 685957 and U.S. Patent 685958 are the ones we should be focusing on as well as modifying and updating them with today?s technology. These are the real frequency receivers that he has invented and if his TPU was a frequency receiver, he would have never taken the time to patent these two after he had already patented his TPU device.
Another thing is that he didn?t patent the Tesla coil until after he patented his frequency receiver which was wasn't patented until 13 years after his TPU patent. That tells me that he knew nothing of receiving frequency?s before he patented his frequency receiver. I am also convinced that he never knew what the raw form of energy really even was. If he did, he would have never referred to energy as different energy's such as radiant and electrons.

It drives me nuts to hear of people referring to energy as different things like radiant, magnetic or electrons. Common sense tells me it has to be vibrations with in frequency's. The more vibrant the frequency, the more powerful the energy.

A simple example of this would be things that smell. Our noses smell these things because the fragrance is actually vibrations that our noses detect like how our ears detect sound. The louder the sound, the more vibrant it is and the stronger the smell, the more vibrant it is.
I think the thing we need to focus on is the vibrations of fragrances. We can create smells by using certain vibrant frequency's because Hutchinson has done this along with others. If we can produce them, then we should be able to attract them like we do with sound frequency's.

This now leads to another experiment in which I will post in the thread, Nightlife?s wacked out idea's. Based on what I have concluded, I have to say that this thread as well as others like it dealing with Tzu?s like the one Tesla had patented, are dead ends and a waste of time to pursue.

I hope I am wrong but I just cant see how I am based on what I have posted. Good luck to you all but be very skeptical about what any one has to say about a TPU that is based on the one like Tesla has patented.

[bolt]

Its hard for me to say as i never built one but its absolutely not the route i would go down to believe or even think its necessary for the mosfets to handle 1kw on the large tpu is a good example. The control box is a timing and voltage amplifier nothing more. The mosfets are NOT acting as a switch mode power supply in the tpu certainly not in the output stage anyway. All of the designs bear witness to this fact. There is  plenty of excellent theory on this site now thats testament to get a tpu working but not many have the time or resources to do it. In my opinion for what its worth the  nuclear magnetic resonance theory using 3D geometry offers the best solution for a tpu. The tpu is an iron atom emulator thats the best description i can think of and this design would require milliamps and fit in a match box.

As SM has raided bits from stuff laying around his workshop non of these tpu are professionally made. The small toroidals raided from main filters, the box maybe from an old amplifier that already had a heat sink on it but it allowed the 3 fets to be screwed in the right places as the holes lined up nice.  The wooden base found laying around in the garage for the large tpu and the covering of the TPU is of model aircraft construction home made stuff covered in plastic SolarFilm to cover the wires. The aero shape of the large tpu was model aircraft construction clearly seen when it was cut open with the jigsaw. You can even see the heat shrunk over the wires.  Even the toggle switches look like an old toggle switch from a car dash board. I bet it was a fog light kit:)  The open frame TPU looks like an old plastic wire spool thats been hacked about.  Nothing here is NASA stuff!

However the timing, geometry and the exact cut lengths of wire in the tpu would never allow a kitchen table builder to make one in a thousand years.