Steven Mark´s associate Jack Durban comes forward with more info !

[bolt]

I dont want to rip this thread up discussing other stuff but i just say this then we can leave it here or open another thread later.

What the videos real close. the first one is never activated and if it was, it was done before the footage was recorded. He was asked to start it and all he did was hooked a probe in the voltage tester.

Thats wrong the battery he is using is already connected and laying down on the table.  His meter is in series to measure the current drawn by the circuit. When the test commences he simply connects the lead into the meter to complete the circuit. I see nothing wrong with this whatsoever. This is Keely design and it works. Like all videos they can either be believed or not. However, if you don't believe anything you see then you can not ever move forward to accept this energy is very real and it keeps your forever blind folded to progressing further. For reasons we don't know same as SM's TPU these videos were leaked and were supposed to be only for investor  purposes not public domain.

As for the motor the back EMF collection has been studied for a long time. Im in no doubt that there are various degrees of success to all this technology there is far too much about to ignore it. The use of caps to dump into resonance has been accepted in the tight community as a way of increasing motor efficiency and im in no doubt this video is true. He has simply perfected the art and looped it back.

I will agree the business ethics of the group creates the problems and speculation. Apparently they want millions up front plus life payments which is why it has never progressed in the last 20 years. Maybe for the same reason as the TPU et al. 

[nightlife]

bolt, I too, do not want to rip this thread up so lets take this discussion to the thread it relates to.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3764.msg83622/topicseen.html#msg83622

[zerotensor]

Removed.....

Because some believe I haven't done my homework!  I am finished with OU.com!  Good luck and best wishes to all!

Regards

You are quitting just because of what some people believe?

Too bad you care so much about what a few people think.
I, for one, listened to what you had to say.  I think you contribute to the conversation in important ways.  We all don't have to agree 100%.  When somebody points out a perceived problem with my ideas, I treat it as a learning / teaching experience.  That is what we do here.  It's the very nature of an open collaboration.  Sure, there are nay-sayers and yea-sayers and know-it-alls.  So what?  There are also sincere, smart, and talented people who share the same goal & can learn a lot from each other.

So, you rip down your post?    I thought collective punishment went out with the Soviet Union...
Presumably, you had something enlightening or important to share with us, but now we won't know because somebody challenged your assertions and that upset you.  Oh, well.

I can understand your sense of frustration.
For me, it is worth it to have this forum where we can bounce our ideas off one another.  The benefits generated by these conversations outweigh the irritations for me.  Plus, the information we contribute is recorded and becomes accessible to the world, and I think that it is an important aspect to what we are doing here--  building a database from which we can draw old ideas and test new ones.

[chrisC]

Removed.....

Because some believe I haven't done my homework!  I am finished with OU.com!  Good luck and best wishes to all!

Regards

Hi Erfinder:

Why be so upset? I've always enjoyed your posts and whilst there are some stuff I still don't understand(yet), it 's such a waste if because of a few  "know all" people, you remove yourself and the rest of us who wants to learn or contribute don't get a chance!

Please reconsider and come back. Thanks

cheers
chrisC

[nightlife]

Erfinder, now I feel bad and please don?t take what I say as criticism and consider it my ignorance if I am wrong by what I have said. I am by far not qualified enough to say something is right or wrong but I will post what I think and if there are people here that can prove me wrong and or teach me something I don't know, then by all means, please do so. Just because I think something is wrong or it should be different doesn't mean it is. I am open to all debates and I have learned a lot from them but that doesn't mean I know it all and that everything I say should be considered the way it is. They are only my thoughts and I feel they are worth thinking about if nothing more.

I will not go in to detail about who I am and what I do but my father is a retired high ranked Naval nuclear physics engineer who retired just under the rank of a Admiral. He was given the choice to become a Admiral or retire, he chose to retire. You should hear all the debates we get into. He is book smart and I am street smart. LOL

Again, I am sorry and please note that I am only here to help and if I say something that is stupid, please let me know because I am no way to proud to admit that I am wrong as long as I can be shown that I am wrong.

You said you have done your homework and I would like to know what your conclusion is, don?t get upset if I happen to question your conclusion.

If you have done your home work, then lets start with Tesla?a TPU which is what SM?s TPU is supposed to designed after. For that matter, lets all talk about it. This is what every ones TPU?s are based on for the most part.

I honestly feel Tesla?s patent was based on efficiency and not over unity or free power. I may be wrong and it may take some convincing to get me to change my mind but lets do this for the sake of this thread and others like it. Lets dissect this patent piece by piece and come to a reasonable conclusion of what it really is as well as what it was really intended for.

If we all had a real understanding of his patent, we wouldn't be debating it.