Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



OU/COP>1 switched cap PS cct like Tesla's 'charge siphoning'

Started by nul-points, April 04, 2008, 11:49:23 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

giantkiller


MinEth3r

Status Update
===========

Hi everyone, late here, thought I should nevertheless drop a line, been a while and lots happened!

Immediate Relenvency, even to previous post
================================
[..; Short Extract From a recent ArXiv Paper by a Doubochinski, 808.1205 ]

The  argumental  pendulum  and  the  argumental  analog  of  Planck?s  elementary  oscillator  are
only  special  cases  of  a  much  more  general  type  of  coupling  of  mechanical  and
electromagnetic  oscillations.  In  the  same  period  as  the  initial  investigations  of  the
Macroscopic Quantum Effect, the Doubochinskis and their collaborators discovered a second
fundamental phenomenon connected with this more general form of interaction: the tendency
of  electrical  oscillators,  coupled  by  more  than  one  form  of  electrodynamic  coupling  and
allowed to move freely in space under the influence of ponderomotive forces between them, to
spontaneously  assemble  themselves  into  stable  configurations  [19-24].   The  significance  of
this discovery can be seen from the following remarks:
 
The intimate interrelationship of ponderomotive and electromotive forces has been recognized
for nearly two centuries and lies at the heart of electrodynamics. But as far as the authors have
been able  to ascertain,  the  implications of  that ponderomotive/electromotive dualism  for  the
interaction  and  coupling  between  oscillatory  systems,  have  never  been  explored  in  a
systematic and comprehensive manner. 

It  is well known that  inductive, capacitative and resistive couplings between the components
of electrical oscillating circuits give rise to mechanical forces between them, and hence also to
various  sorts  of  mechanical  vibrations.  In  this  way  electrical  and  mechanical  oscillations
never  exist  in  isolation,  but  are  always  present  simultaneously.  It  had  not  been  realized,
however, that the interplay of these two types of oscillations leads to self-organizing behavior
in oscillating systems.
=================

As you can see, this is the basic physical fact that has been missing in my research thus far IMHO.
One has to keep in mind unquantum.com, in fact the whole body of knowledge should be cross-related.
Ab initio ether lab anyone? Longitudinal term in magnetism anyone? Is Distinti's material relevant here?

NIA1 and subsequent fit reallly well. A more solid theoretical background (*Full* complex numbers, aka
quaternions, with units having length 1/2, kinda a parity bit, a beyond bit 0, a bit -1... mandatory, talking
about rotations, they are even positive number of reflections in odd d), anyway. I'm on it, the mathematical beefing up.
On ArXiv's and others' pace, but growing steadly stronger by the minute.

The parity can go nside the glyph systems, let say write in base 16 with 0 1234567 8/H GFEDCBA, readable as

  1234567
0             8/H
  ABCDEFG

So A=-1 in any base, in fact base 16 is determined by H=8. In this simple scheme every letter is signed, has its MSB = to 1. With good stuff out there, Spectral Linear Algebra (G. Sobczyk and its no-nonsense linear algebra course!) in *-algebras (big 200+ pages manual landed on the ArXiv recently, extension and generalisation and forward-putting of results explicilty linking "geometric algebra"-esque power with hilbert spaces strucure requirement elsewhere (hard to phrase for me non mathematician sorry)

     From there, general theory of tensors (invariants between coordinate change) of general order, 3, 4, 5 and up! New algorithms to change base and do a lot of math on truncated power series that where not that efficient before, on arxiv again. Really easy to all work with, now If i can tie in a Pythagorean Triple parametrization of the circle (of the sphere, solid pythagorean triple, ?la 3(3)+4(4)+5(5)=6(6) maybe, the product of the four radii squared of the 4 circles of a triangle/anysetofthreedifferentpoints yielding the square of the area of the triangle aka Archimedes formula aka Heron's formula), of the geometric product... Struggling to take into account the flatten geometric square root spiral as they call it, the 4th euclidean dimension, how to manifest all those in a plane, map them out and their possible intractions...

Carl Brannen is moving big, steady progress and work done great stuff at carlbrannen.wordpress.com You might be delighted by his August, 12 post.

***

Thinking about the Gun engine (80-90% efficient), and also momentarily about the back-to-back Fogal Transistor/Semiconductor junction, ?la McKie PodMod; anything to not waste that longitudinal energy. Compressible or incompressible ether? great case made by Carl on his WP blog about ethereal elasticity with four euclidean dimensions...

    Argumental theory coupling, have still to double check against Eric's Trigometric Identity if they're both amenable to the same point. Shuffling of mass/inertia energy, trying to tie in DeAquino's antigrav theory, explained in another way, a 10um distance between source and target of a ryddberg blockade experiment speaks a lot, atoms can interact over large distance, and best of all our current theory account for everything, supposedly. Yet the magnetic Soviet Kicker speaks volume for the effort I'm undertaking. Symplectic constraints view Quantum Theory is another paper linking it all with work from Carl to unitary motion with boundary conditions in special spaces of eigenenergies, others too are marvelous, so much information out nowadays, hard to follow let me tell you :O)

   Intend to keep you informed on anything relating to this, hahaha maybe plans for cheap wireless power modules for the house and garage :O) Maybe with something like this http://rexresearch.com/seike/seike.htm or the Two-Stage Milkovic Mechanical Oscillator, both obeying maybe to the very same physics (oscillatory systems, longitudinal term exposed in the JLN data plot regarding the seike inverter clock?! nah... must be something else.) Induction must play a role, since very near the source it (measurements) doesn't agree well with Maxwell, as per the original NI paper by Distinti.

Pretty excited and fried over by the overcoming novelty this world faces, aside from its immediate challenges,
   AdM

nul-points

Welcome back Min

...did you forget 'sonoluminescence'  (/cavitation, perhaps?) in your list above?  ;)

all the best sandy

Doc Ringwood's Free Energy site  http://ringcomps.co.uk/doc
"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra

MinEth3r

Hehehe good call,
    cavitation is mentionned in every good book on hydraulics e.g. in the DoE nuclear power plant maintenance manuals for diesel engines, heat exchangers, hydraulic pumps, etc. Didn't think about it, but it is an argumentally-coupled oscillator system, at least I think.

There's a beacon effect around 3 Cycles/second IIRC inside a ultrasonically driven water sonoluminescence bubble.
There's also the sonoluminescence of MegaCpS waves used to clean and even etch silicon wafers, lots of small light flashes, great pictures available somewhere... can't recall sorry.

Yep, pretty good call, sonoluminescence.

The stable configuration (lattice? some of the usual trigonometry ought to be recast in this setting, with some stochastic math thrown in, hmmm) of oscillators left to themselves and the longitudinal energy exchange inbetween systems, in fact beats between two waves, anyway pretty solid description in the work by the Doubochinski. Superb papers on ArXiv - again! - called Computing with almost periodic functions, http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/0808.1814 really interesting in light of Symplectic view on Quantum Constraints, http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/0808.1068 . More in line with what I had in mind (hehe up to a point, of course :P) in this one: http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/0806.2464, Symplectic Deformations, Non Commutative Scalar Fields and Fractional Quantum Hall Effect.
Fractional Quantum Hall Effect is the world wide standard of the Ohm, hence the Volt. Lots of paper about this very exprimental setup.

And Distinti is getting his Ethereal Mechanics ready for the end of the year... :O)  Gotta get care of the aglebra right, nilpotents, idempotents, geometric product and *-algebras, all combined into a megaultragiga 4D, maybe nul-5D as Jose Almeida did pretty powerfully.

   Will probably write something in Javascript for the thread, to enable people to participate and me to continue working on it, I'm almost ready, so I'll just rush it and start writing code to do some of the required mostly symbolic math to simulate second-order (Advance action paper by Boozer on Arxiv yields interesting food for thought on the "waves from the future" in second order differo-integral systems) quaternionic systems, will be fun :O) ...once I get how the 24 Hurwitz Units of Quaternions play their role symmetry-wise, (all in a bought but lost John Conway book AKPeters about Quaternions and Octonions, sigh) will try to get it working, a circuit simulator with the integration scheme of GLafreniere.com? Something along this line. *Still babbling, sigh*

Gotta move, all the best,
     MinEth3r

nul-points

Min

at the risk of continuing to add information here (which really ought now to have its own thread in the 'Theory of overunity and free energy' forum  http://www.overunity.com/index.php/board,27.0.html to get the full exposure to as many members as possible) - what is your considered view of ECE theory (Evans et al)?  points for - and points against?

thanks
sandy

Doc Ringwood's Free Energy site  http://ringcomps.co.uk/doc

"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra