Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



OU/COP>1 switched cap PS cct like Tesla's 'charge siphoning'

Started by nul-points, April 04, 2008, 11:49:23 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

MinEth3r

Good stuff Sandy, keep it up and rising :O)

    Monitoring your effort, waiting for Distinti's ether mechanics paper, waiting also for time to play ArXiv cacthup, been so busy lately, my summer research's on hold for almost two months now... Can't think of anything to add right now, will keep lurking and my notify box checked. :O)

All the best,
Min

nul-points

hi Min

thanks for your interest

i looked for a new thread by MinEth3r a while back but couldn't see anything, so i hope it's because you've been partying hard!  ;)

yes, i feel progress is being made here, slowly - an alternative method of confirming similar levels of overunity results and a possible ID of the source of the charge/energy imbalance (at a macro level) are very encouraging developments for me

now that the scope traces confirm energy efficiency levels > 100% actually at the resistive load (not just on the circuit as a whole) i'm encouraged to move on to comparative heat measurements on the load resistor when powered first by the circuit and then by equivalent direct DC drive


all the best with the research
sandy

Doc Ringwood's Free Energy site  http://ringcomps.co.uk/doc
"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra

nul-points

hi all

interesting developments with the switched charge experiments in the last week...

i'm in the process of using the circuit to perform work which can be measured - rather than just rely on the scope & meter readings which have recently been showing efficiencies for the test circuit around 140 - 150%

the first type of work (details to be posted when the testing is complete) is so far reliably showing efficiencies around 280% - and because work has been done this is very tangible evidence of overunity action

the circuit hasn't changed (apart from the load) so this suggests that waveform capturing and quantification techniques aren't telling the whole story

some more equipment to test the circuit with a completely different type of load - and work - should be arriving this week, so hopefully i'll have some more news soon

all the best
sandy

Doc Ringwood's Free Energy site  http://ringcomps.co.uk/doc
"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra

alan

Found some interesting articles, didn't know where else to post :)

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9708394
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0307126v1

Looking forward to your new tests, Sandy.

nul-points

hi alan

thanks for the links - i've just downloaded the PDFs & i'll check them out

sadly, i messed up with these most recent load-test results and the flyback energy interpretation (thanks to David C for a replication which showed the flyback error!)

i left out a factor in the latest calcs and ended up not comparing the same measure of input and output energies - and in the flyback energy calcs i've found i used the average current in the calc, not the peak!

so my best system efficiency so far still stands at around 150% - and corrected flyback calc confirms that energy returned from flyback = energy input to coil field

one positive thing to come out of the latest test though was to get results, with an actual physical measurement of work, which confirmed that the energy stored within a capacitor is equal to the same amount of work energy that it took to store it

this is a second and different confirmation of my original assumption that if you want a quick guide to how much energy has been output from the system you can just double the value of the energy in the output capacitor

so - i don't feel quite so stupid for my mess-up with the calc :-[

all the best
sandy

Doc Ringwood's Free Energy site  http://ringcomps.co.uk/doc
"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra