IPMM MAN-device for the proof of magnetic overunity.

Dact · May 10, 2008, 12:20:48 AM

Hey, MAN, I get very skeptical when the Youtube videos suddenly become unavailable! Also, any proof of magnetic overunity will not be near as complicated as this. The laws of nature are far too simple. The answer is staring us all right in the face, and is stated best by Bob Dylan. Any guesses?

sparks · May 10, 2008, 01:00:24 AM

Permanent magnets are just a crystal lattice of metal atoms that is manufactured by passing a dc current through the metal as it cools down.
Then the metal is exposed to an electromagnet produced flux generator to fill it up with well magnetic flux. Magnetic flux is just the response of the aether to potential energy distribution. The ambient magnetic field has to be overcome continously in order for potential energy to be released from mass which is the combination of both energy and antienergy. There is potential energy in conductors which is easy to extract. The ambient energy field of the Earth refills the conductor with potential energy. All that is needed is a magnetic disruption in the field about the conductor and the potential energy is translated.

AnandAadhar · May 10, 2008, 03:54:50 AM

Quote from: Dact on May 10, 2008, 12:20:48 AM
Hey, MAN, I get very skeptical when the Youtube videos suddenly become unavailable! Also, any proof of magnetic overunity will not be near as complicated as this. The laws of nature are far too simple. The answer is staring us all right in the face, and is stated best by Bob Dylan. Any guesses?

The YouTubes movies of this machine are available from my page http://nl.youtube.com/user/anandaadhar. They are in fine order.
Yes, Bob Dylan sang: 'the times are changing', also changing our machines into OU machines. If you consider the movement of planets as a proof of natural overunity, the proof is there already. Okay. But if we want to catch that energy in a machine we must make a balance of forces good enough to harness that universal restlessness. And that, as yet, is not as simple as we want. Know that the design 2.0 is the so-called bypass when the mechanical fails. First of all I try for the mechanical version. More simple we can't get than mechanically balancing magnets into OU.

AnandAadhar · May 10, 2008, 04:03:49 AM

Quote from: sparks on May 10, 2008, 01:00:24 AM
Permanent magnets are just a crystal lattice of metal atoms that is manufactured by passing a dc current through the metal as it cools down.
Then the metal is exposed to an electromagnet produced flux generator to fill it up with well magnetic flux. Magnetic flux is just the response of the aether to potential energy distribution. The ambient magnetic field has to be overcome continously in order for potential energy to be released from mass which is the combination of both energy and antienergy. There is potential energy in conductors which is easy to extract. The ambient energy field of the Earth refills the conductor with potential energy. All that is needed is a magnetic disruption in the field about the conductor and the potential energy is translated.

As for magnetic motors without coils and wire, are conductors in our case diamagnetic materials. Wesley Gary, a contemporary of Tesla, (see http://www.rexresearch.com/gary/gary1.htm) used this capacity to make his machine that was in fact the first real magnet motor. He noticed a reverse of the diamagnetic polarity when the materal passed a so-called neutral zone around a (composite) horseshoemagnet. This effect has been poorly understood indeed and has hardly been replicated. Al francour tried it but couldn't get the thing under control. (see http://keelynet.com/energy/gary2001.htm) I agree, we should learn more about this.

AnandAadhar · June 01, 2008, 05:20:29 AM

At YouTube http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=pHWgxEFk2_g I have posted a video with an update on the progress with the IPMM cakra spinner. Two designs 2.2 and 3.0 are demonstrated. The electronic suggestion of 2.0 has been abandoned since a fully mechanical OU device was the plan. I have improved the feedback arm, and the stator arrangement. The stator movement is now circular instead of linear. The jerking and the need to control that has thus been overcome. This was achieved by employing a rotating stator bridge above the rotating disc. The preliminary conclusion is that rotation on rotation is the best way to drive the ipmm to make the overunity free energy experiment a success. No selfrunning status has been achieved yet though. A more carefully engineered balancing of forces, transfer mechanisms, weights, distances and strengths is needed. But there is concept development for what may be hoped to be the reliable, replicable proof of OU for the final sake of a eco-no-money future of free energy for 21th century mankind. Version history added to the video with the design drawings.

AnandAadhar