IPMM MAN-device for the proof of magnetic overunity.

[AnandAadhar]

Well you've got an interesting and ingenious variation on the
ancient sunwheel idea.

Why exactly you want to make it 100% mechanical and not partly
solid state electronics is unclear to me, but of course it's your perogative.
In my opinion solid state non-moving OU electrical generators are what we
want, because they don't experience phyisical friction of the moving parts
and thus wear down less fast.

But that does not change the fact that you have an interesting approach.
Keep up the good work!

Well I don't have to do what Bearden and Bedini have done. They did their share in proving the OU case. What we need for education is the mechanical version. I believe it is possible to have a mechanical translation of the Bedini and Bearden proofs: stressing fields:>reaction force> overunity. In stead of an electronic circuit a magnetic circuit. I know it is not interesting for an efficient production of energy directly, but the mechanical proof is the final drop for the paradigm to break through. When we have an easy schoolboy demonstration replicable version, then will all teachers have to explain why that works. That is it. We don't just corner the fields into OU, but also the sitting powers...that's my plan.

[Low-Q]

If you pay attention  to my free energy lecture on this (2-part 1: http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y3jwymwwFo) we, here at overunity.com are dealing with fourth generation sustainable energy technologies. Wind mills, solar energy and tidal plants clearly belong to the earliers generations. What we are engaged in here is the direct harnessing of space energy without an intermediate like the ocean.

AA

Hi,

I see. I was refering to this:

If you consider the movement of planets as a proof of natural overunity, the proof is there already. Okay. But if we want to catch that energy in a machine we must make a balance of forces good enough to harness that universal restlessness.

I thought you ment that there is energy in the movements of the planets. They are as we know in a perfect balance between gravity and centripetal force. They contain only static kinetic energy as long as they can freely orbit the sun without altering direction, speed etc. due to other forces than gravity from other planets. However, they are in fact slowing down due to friction through gasses, astroides, and so on. They are quite heavy so the process takes a few weeks to a complete stop

In other words: I do not really understand how you can harness space energy. Where do you find a potential difference as big as the universe? If so, this difference will force to equalize, and in this process you can convert that equalizing energy potentials into mechanical movement. I mean that harnessing energy can only be done where you have a potential energy difference. I can't see where you can find that out of thin air (space).

Vidar.

[AnandAadhar]

Hi,

I see. I was refering to this:I thought you ment that there is energy in the movements of the planets. They are as we know in a perfect balance between gravity and centripetal force. They contain only static kinetic energy as long as they can freely orbit the sun without altering direction, speed etc. due to other forces than gravity from other planets. However, they are in fact slowing down due to friction through gasses, astroides, and so on. They are quite heavy so the process takes a few weeks to a complete stop

In other words: I do not really understand how you can harness space energy. Where do you find a potential difference as big as the universe? If so, this difference will force to equalize, and in this process you can convert that equalizing energy potentials into mechanical movement. I mean that harnessing energy can only be done where you have a potential energy difference. I can't see where you can find that out of thin air (space).

Vidar.

Planets move because of the space energy of the relative ether. Ether is a spacial force field. The basic three ethers are: the expanding time space, the contracting universal space, and the local forcefield of curved space around the cosmic condensate of the stars and planets. All matter is a condensation of the primal energy of the ether. The basic idea of harnessing the space energy of the relative ether is simple: the magnet polarizes the space around it in a static fashion. Space energy is chaotic: it bubbles as Bearden says, it goes in every direction, but magnets create order in that energy and make the magnet do work.  Thus we have the dipole. Harnessing that dipole has to be done in magnetic alternation working a load in such a way representing the three forms of ether that the poles are not allowed to stick; as Bearden says: don't kill the dipole. The primal stator figures for the centrifugal expanding force. The feedback secondary stators stand for the creative or controlling centripetal force (weaker in effect than the first one). The spinning disc stands for the cyclic of the local order. Thus we make two magnet fields spinning on top of each other, the moving stator and rotor, we make them chase each others sticky point eventually using drag and eddy currents to stick the two together. That point becomes the powerpoint, it becomes the advantage, not the hindrance. Thus we have momentum. The real problem is the timing and control of that energy in the magnetic circuit balancing the forces of the ether, otherwise the two fields (or forces) run out of sync and are we thus misrepresenting the universal forces and  will we never get our hand (the start-up engine) out of the equation.  The electronic circuit of the MEG proves the energy can be caught and used. The question is: can we do that same thing in a magnetic circuit timing the momentum and thus make the passive force a reactive force, as Bedini calls it, to do work for us?

Remember: the basic hypothesis we are testing here is: stressed magnet fields replenish from the vacuum. That is what we are trying to confirm.  That is the source of the OU we are looking for. Bearden proved this thesis solid state electronically, Bedini proved the 'ether gas' electromechanically with coils and batteries. Now the final proof of the mechanics of magnets alone delivering OU in a circuit containing a load is to be delivered. If easily replicable, then we are done with the paradigm in a scientific way. Research, Theory, hypothesis and then the experiment to confirm, to prove, that what thus has been assumed to be true is true.

AA

[AnandAadhar]

I have posted at YouTube my trials with the IPMM MAN device. Finally the ideal concept of feedback was found resulting with version 4.0 in the conclusion that by this type of design no magnetic overunity can be found. I rest my case.
See the vids part 1 & 2
http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=NVap7HFc4ig
http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=mpXnPXqKYYc&feature=related

AA

[Harvey]

Sadly I was hoping to see the oneway bearings at work in version 4.0 to remove the backlash