The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

[poynt99]

what probably is happening, is you are getting a return through the ground lead on the scope probe. is both your scope and FG AC-powered?

if so, then I would suspect this is where your FG is getting it's return--through the earth/chassis lead.

try a fully isolated FG and your input signal will probably cease to exist while using only the pos. lead. you could use a transformer-coupled output, or a battey-powered FG

[gn0stik]

Unhook your scope.. Easy to test.

[tishatang]

@All

Some thoughts that have come into my mind in regards to the "new" design:
We wind the caduceus wound toroid as a bifiler coil.  Two strands together.  One will be the right spin collector and one will be the left spin collector.  For rotation, we can use a single AC source to drive the vertical and horizontal coils for Lorretz O rotation..  The positive side for one direction of spin and the negative side for the other direction of spin.  Since both are being driven at the same time, we prevent runaway.  The fact that each hemisphere of the planet has its own dominate way the torsion forces want to flow, we will get some voltage output as we sum the two voltage outputs together from the Toroid Collector(s).  One side will produce more voltage than the other.  For example go to :

file:///C:/DOCUME~1/Chris/LOCALS~1/Temp/Rar$EX09.968/coler/coler2.htm

Partial Quote:
    "Due to a source, up to the present not investigated, and not explainable by existing scientific theories, an additional quantity of energy is freed during each cycle which leads to a continual raising of the amplitude of the mutual processes, until the magnetic cores are saturated.

    "From the fact that in the resistance of the apparatus pulsed direct current is flowing? There is possibly an up to now unknown rectifying effect, or alternatively the gain in energy is produced only during one half of the cycle, either during the charging or discharging of the plates. The activity in the apparatus must take place in the ten oscillation circuits in a phase-like manner? No technical means were available to make the necessary tuning adjustments.

    "It is clear from the above that the success of the inventor up to now could only be due to chance, or happy accident. The necessity, therefore, arises to transfer the apparatus from the state of empirical development, with sufficient technical means and based on results of an exact basic research, to a state of working procedure which can be controlled." Other experiments, conducted by Frohlich with the arrangement in Figure 6, convinced Coler that his theory was correct:

    "The result obtained with this experimental arrangement? was the clear proof of a considerably larger energy during opening (intake), compared with closing impulses. The [10-50%] difference is always in favor of the opening impulse? Consequently this observation can also be considered as a proof of the fact that an energy difference exists. [There is a] considerable, but extremely short, energy peak of the opening impulse. My development of the "Space Energy Receiver" was based on this and was successful."

    In the 1980s, George Hathaway (Planetary Association for Clean Energy, PACE) constructed a Magnetstromapparat that produced 50 millivolts, and demonstrated it at unconventional technology conferences. There has been no news of further development. The Barkhausen Effect upon which the Coler inventions work is a low-field phenomenon that occurs when a ferromagnetic material is subjected to a change in the applied magnetic field. A series of discontinuous steps develop, corresponding to reversals in magnetization domain volumes from 10-10 to 10-8 cm3. The size of the discontinuities can be increased by stressing the magnet. Possibly the soft iron magnets which Coler used were subjected to such stress by ultrasonic magnetostriction from the coil windings at the 180 kHz resonant frequency. One can only wonder why British Intelligence (sic) declassified the Coler report, but we can be glad they did. If only they had seen fit to include more schematics of the Stromzeuger, because the available diagrams are woefully inadequate. At least we now know a few key facts, to wit: (1) Ferromagnetism resonates at 180 Khz; (2) The Barkhausen Effect can be amplified to provide useful power (10 Khz is another key frequency here); (3) "Some of the magnets are wound in a clockwise direction looking at the N pole (called left) and others in an anti-clockwise direction (called right)". The resistance of the magnet-coil combination was about 0.33 ohm; (4) "The basic principle is that an electron is to be regarded not only as a negatively charged particle but also as a South magnetic pole"; (5) "The novel feature is that the capacities are connected to the secondary core through permanent magnets"; (6) "There is a considerable, but extremely short, energy peak of the opening impulse". It is to be hoped that the Stromzeuger can be redeveloped, since it is a relatively simple, low technology device requiring no exotic components. It should not be left "to chance, or a happy accident", as it was for Hans Coler.
************************************
I submit that the voltage Hans Coler got was because of the difference in relative strengths of the counter rotating fields coming in from the either.  It will always be stronger in one direction, or else whirlpools forming going down drains would a random event.

If this difference gives sufficient power in our "new" TPU, it means that in a counter rotating field environment, we are relatively safe from runaway.  We need only drive from single source AC, each side rectified and going to its respective coils for rotation.  We need only focus on the rotation speed necessary to get the magic to start happening.

A simple experiment to maybe prove this theory:
Get a 20 inch bicycle inner tube.  Put enough air in it to hold its shape but not to bulge in a weak spot.  Wind your bifiler caduceus toroid around it.  On each set of leads, put a led or neon bulb (or whatever is appropriate load).  Probably needs a diode ahead of the load?
Wind a small induction coil around the Caduceus toroid and put an AC signal into it.  One bulb should be brighter?  Try short +_DC pulses.  The stressed aether might rebound and give you more back than you put in?  The point is, one output  should be stronger than the other.

Try ramping up the frequency and see if resonance points are reached?  If so, make a different sized caduceus toroid and see if it has the same resonance points.  This will tell us if the resonance points are caused by the coil size or from the aether.  If there is a common resonance point, that might be a design frequency to look for in the new design.

I hope this helps.
Tishatang

[pauldude000]

@all

Good call guys, I think it was the scope providing either electrical power or a ground.

Gn0stic, I unhooked the scope as you suggested, and the "lights went out", pardon the pun.

I intend to investigate this effect more elaborately later. Right now I am not feeling very good.

Paul Andrulis

[tishatang]

@All

Here is a circuit that might prove helpful for the front end of the TPU? 
Link here:

http://www.techlib.com/electronics/crystal.html

Partinal Quote:  "Crystal Radio RF Amplifier
For the more experienced hobbyist...
One of the best places to add a transistor to a simple crystal radio is at the front end in the form of an RF amplifier. The circuit below is a simple but effective amplifier which will give surprising performance improvement. This amplifier can exhibit negative resistance for low settings of the 500 ohm pot which results in extra gain or even oscillation. So, the circuit can actually be considered to be a regenerative receiver with an external detector. The sensitivity is so high that no cold water pipe ground is needed and the antenna is short.

The behavior of the amplifier depends on how it is connected to the tuned circuit. When connected to a lower impedance tap as shown in the schematic, the gain will be lower with less tendency to oscillate. Higher taps or even connection directly to the antenna will give higher gain and even oscillation. The 500 ohm pot is adjusted to give adequate gain without squealing as stations are tuned. High regeneration settings will actually narrow the bandwidth of the tank enough to give the sound a "mellow" quality which sounds pretty good in a "tinny" crystal earphone! Lower settings are best when using an audio amplifier and the fidelity is quite good thanks to the linear detector (typical regens use changes in the operating point of the transistor to demodulate the RF). As with any regen, the gain may be increased after the station is tuned in and the circuit will oscillate, locked to the station's frequency.
bullet   Current consumption is about 1 mA which may be reduced by increasing the 1.8k but the RF envelope begins to distort below about 500 uA.
bullet   A 4.5 volt battery may be used if the 220 k resistor is reduced to 68 k.
bullet   The transistor may be just about any NPN small-signal transistor.
bullet   No ground is shown but performance is better with a good ground connected to the bottom of the tuner.
bullet   Longer antennas should be connected to taps instead of across the whole coil. A ferrite loopstick will pick up stronger stations with no antenna at all but use more audio gain after the diode detector and reduce the regeneration to get adequate bandwidth or the sound will be muffled."
**********************************

I can't seem to be able to copy the image of the schematic here, but available on above link.  What if the antenna-tuning input part part were replaced by my proposed 174.7 Khz resonant coil/magnet build?  Maybe the oscillations would build slowly being fed by natural resonance?  This could be a driver for vertical and horizontal coils to achieve rotation due the Loentz O force?

Just an idea.
Tishatang