The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

[triffid]

test,just wanted a link back to this thread.triffid

[BEP]

Gentlemen,

"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction".

For every Force there is an equal and resultant opposite summation of reactions or a single reaction by forces or a force.

1. I believe the author of the first was mistranslated.
2. He was thinking in 2D.

Edit-->>

@Paul

This sounds like I'm attempting to negate you thinking but I'm not.

Let E=Force, C=Action and M=Inertia. The result would equal Mass or Energy?

The other three vectors are still missing. You can't have action at a distance but why not force?
Every time I look at this I think the equation is only half complete until the result always = zero.

Enough rambling.... off to kiss butt for a paycheck again.....

[aleks]

Force IS "action over distance". This is IMPLIED in physics. So, when particles collide, the fact of collision implies distance (from their virtual centers), because particles have non-zero size. If they were zero-sized, they would not collide. I think it's pretty safe to assume that spherical electrostatic field that surrounds electrons is the field that acts over distance, and force it puts on surrounding electrostatic fields depends on the momentary distance between centers of electrons. "Fusion" of electrons thus implies zero distance between electrons and requirement of infinite force applied -> thus impossible (unless, of course, electrostatic field of electrons is more complex).

On pauldude000's C, E, M graph, I think it's just a misleading graph. In my understanding there is no difference between "electric" (electrostatic) field and magnetic field (I gave some insights why before in some other posts). What every physicist seemingly forgetting is that ANY wave motion is performed in a complex plane thus having "real" and "imaginary" components. So, what is assumed to be a thing that differentiates electric and magnetic fields could simply be an existence of both real and imaginary components in wave. It's simply the same thing in quadrature: no need to extract "electric" and "magnetic" components in the flow of electrons. It's the same thing: a flow of electrons that have electrostatic fields. It's the reason Tesla could send TWO currents over the same wire in both directions: he probably simply knew mathematics and Fourier transform well, and built electronics that used real and imaginary parts of current independently. Even though, it may seem too mathematical, the truth is that this "wave" mathematics is fully supported by physical reality, so it's not someone's fantasy. Even radiowaves have inherent quadrature polarization.

[pauldude000]

@loner, pese, & all

I have a possible oscillator I just designed, based upon a Hartley oscillator, with feedback for a two CC TPU I would like some input on.

Here is the schematic:



Notes: I tried to design it to use the capacitance of the CC's themselves, using high capacitance bifiliar winding technique. C in the schematic represents this natural capacitance.

The two switches  (S1 and S2) allow the system to be initiated by battery, then battery disconnected, with a safety shutoff for the feedback power from the collector. (makes me feel better though the feedback switch is more for peace of mind than usability.)

The bridge rectifier is to be constructed out of 25ns high clamp speed/power glass diodes.

D1, D2, and D3 are to force manually controlled current flow in the circuit.

R is a yet to be determined resistor which limits voltage/current flow through the feedback.

C1 is to block an accidental DC emitter to base short.

CC1 & 2 are the control coils.

The feedback power is taken directly from the collector through the bridge to self power the circuit after battery is disconnected.

...................

Now, what have I missed or hooked up wrong? (This is design stage, and I have not built it yet.)

Paul Andrulis

[Grumpy]

High self-capacitance will effectively prevent the "effect" from occuring.

What you need is high self-inductance and this is what Tesla got with his "extra coil".  Self-inductance is max and self-capacitance min when the length of the coil (single layer solenoid) equals the diameter.  You can find this in old radio books as well as Dollard's work.