Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

Started by pauldude000, April 09, 2008, 08:35:14 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Grumpy

It is the men of insight and the men of unobstructed vision of every generation who are able to lead us through the quagmire of a in-a-rut thinking. It is the men of imagination who are able to see relationships which escape the casual observer. It remains for the men of intuition to seek answers while others avoid even the question.
                                                                                                                                    -Frank Edwards

modernsteam

Quote from: AhuraMazda on April 10, 2008, 04:58:36 PM
@aleks

An antenna to receive what?
We must identify the source of energy first. If switching magnets can some how manipulate gravity or the Earths own magnetic
field the we may get something.

As far as the waves shape goes, the lazy person in me say's use square waves but look around you. We live in an
analogue world and sine waves have a lot of properties. You can get a lot more interesting harmonics than you would
with square waves. Look at the works of Keeley or Russel and you see what I mean.

I think text book Electronic or Electrical engineering view is not enough to solve this riddle.

AM


This is my take from  readings and oral discussions with others in the Over-Unity "Community":

The antenna could receive surplus/additional energy from the Earth's magnetic field, or perhaps the Quantum Vacuum, a.k.a., "Zero-Point" Energy, as some have said. The latter is not really a correct term for said massless energy from the Vacuum of Space, because it refers only to the very tiny part remaining after all matter, and hence sensible heat, especially radiant heat, is removed from a designated portion of Space, theorized by the Casimir Effect, and physically demonstrated by Steve Lamoreaux in the late '90s. There's much more high-density Space Energy, as pointed out by Heaviside, Plank, Dirac, Wheeler, and Puthoff, and Tesla himself. By sharply perturbing a local area of Space around the circuitry of a TPU, or any other EMF-based "Free Energy" generator/converter as has been discussed many times in the TPU thread by references to oscillations and pulses, the "kicks" mentioned are those very virtual photons, or virtual electrons from the Dirac "Sea" "sucked" into the output windings, potentializing them, and possibly other circuit components in the TPU or other such generators. I think those are the resultant voltage "spikes" which Steven Mark - and John Bedini - talk about. But In these OU generators or converters, a specific antenna is generally not necessary, the output coils acting sufficiently as antennae receiving potential from the Vacuum onto the charges/electrons of the OP coil current. My reference for all of this is the writings of Lt. Col. Tom Bearden.

modernsteam

Quote from: allcanadian on August 01, 2008, 11:55:31 AM
@paul
I would agree but this is a rather simplistic view---- which is a good thing ;D we should keep things simple. I always like to turn things around to understand the other perspective, If an increasing voltage potential leads to increased amperage flow then ----an increasing amperage flow will lead to a increasing voltage potential. ...

@AllCanadian:

It seems basic electrical physics lessons in high school and community college made it fairly clear that through Ohm's Law, I = E/R, amperage varies as voltage, but not the reverse. From my understanding of simple electrodynamics, though increasing voltage gives rise to increasing current, increasing current as a first-cause phenomenon/event prior to voltage has not to date, existed, and thus cannot cause increasing voltage - unless, of course, someone can show me that that has indeed happened. After all, confirming physical evidence is the only real substantiation  in science, not theory, text, or whatever, and certainly not the preachments of our "celebrated" physicists, be they Park, Kaku, or anyone else. So, increasing current results from increasing voltage, but because we know the current, we can calculate the voltage which caused it using Ohm's Law.

- a fellow Canuck -


BEP

Quote from: modernsteam on August 04, 2008, 09:17:12 PM
@AllCanadian:

It seems basic electrical physics lessons in high school and community college made it fairly clear that through Ohm's Law, I = E/R, amperage varies as voltage, but not the reverse.


@modernsteam

And what of the action of a tunnel diode or a NRO (negative resistance oscillator) or the variation of velocity factor on a transmission line using external magnetic or electric fields? (I haven't confirmed the 'electric field' part of that statement, yet.)

If I understand them correctly the resistance/impedance is changed causing a change in voltage without a change in current or a change in current without a change in voltage. My point is, speed should be part of the equation.

sparks

     I believe mass fields are round and are confined by triangulated vector electric fields as well as defined by spinning triangulated vector electric fields.  Where they touch is where resonance is achieved.

See below.  Tesla's 3 6 9 is in there somewhere along with the south pole of the Earth being different than the north pole.  Least ways in my mind.
Think Legacy
A spark gap is cold cold cold
Space is a hot hot liquid
Spread the Love