The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

[pauldude000]

@Grumpy

You are absolutely correct. Linear type (LCR) resonance would be a complete accident if you managed to produce OU. Good thing I am not talking about linear resonance ehhh?

@Innovation

Please re-read the "About Resonance" post on the previous page again, carefully........

You are still talking ordinary linear resonance, not superharmonic nonlinear resonance. BIG difference.

One signal is completely linear. Two or more at 1/4 or 1/2 wave harmonics are STILL linear. One or more linear signals wont "cut the mustard", so to speak.

You need nonlinear resonant frequencies (for the effects), in a linear circuit (for stability and repeatability).

@GK

I will use "Bearden" terminology.

Using nonlinear resonance, you get the same effect with AC signals (AC scalar potential latching to AC current), as with the currently attempted DC bias. ( Pulsed DC scalar potential latching to DC bias current). Both are a form of nonlinear resonance. I have determined though through careful thought that Telsa's approach would probably work better using AC, though it is more difficult to accomplish. The same nonlinear resonance should be possible through square wave DC, but with the proper third harmonic tuning of the second frequency according to the first applied base frequency.

Two linear resonant signals applied to a wire will travel independently of each other through the wire, with little real affect. The signals will not "join" together to become one, until nonlinear frequencies are used (multiples or divisions of three).

I was locked for a long time in thinking this joining as "figurative superimposition", useful mainly for only increasing voltage. But after reading some more of Bearden's work, I realized that it affects the WHOLE signal (all aspects of it), and that it is not limited to just the voltage. The two signals LITERALLY become one signal, voltage, amperage, period, etc.... I also realized that I had been going ass backwards about this, in that a voltage (potential) "drags" or "pushes" a current, and that a high current signal is acted upon a current starved voltage signal. (for instance, using high potential "kicks" with a DC current bias.) This effect is somewhat.  The "time" effect is part of the latching process.

Using a "tuned" circuit ( I have no doubts Tesla tuned his toilet paper for maximum efficiency )...... What really floored me was the Tesla coil, the lowly Tesla coil. I realized JUST why they are so tuning sensitive. I thought it was to achieve 1/4 wave resonance in the secondary. You could tune the primary to an exact 1/4 wave all day long, but would have to retune to a different frequency for real effect. This never made sense to me. It makes all the sense in the world, now that I know it is a linear device, but being hit with nonlinear resonance.

I may have suspected, but I didn't "know", so to speak. I was figuring that the nonlinearity of signal was coming through the harmonics at the spark gap. I always ASSUMED that the primary should be wound for 1/4 wave as well.  I was right in some assumptions, but ONLY to a point, and completely WRONG on many others.. However, if the primary is feeding a base THIRD, with the other "harmonics" therefore being nonlinear SUPERHARMONICS of the secondaries resonant frequency........ No WONDER his coils went ape. I have no means in my brain of even computing the amplification factors involved!

Oh MY you are talking amplification on levels I have not even DREAMED of!

Paul Andrulis
   

[forest]

This is all too complicated I agree. Things are simple in nature and complication is only done by multiplying simple structures.

I could say something like "TPU end of the game" or "Lords or the ring" ;-) but who cares about it ?

Just get iron toroid core,put on top of it similar but not closed bare or light insulated copper wire. Insulate both with tape (tiny tape not electric one) or maybe even better - let them be here. Wind on top of this around toroid something like bifilar coil but quite extraordinary - one wire must be of higher diameter, or even better wind first coil then second coil on top of that first. Coils arrangement must be such as described in McFarland Cook patent , with adjusted resistance , that so secondary reverse current phase must match with primary current.
In fact it generate higher and higher frequency from applied pulse. The coils must be able to sustain that oscillations rise in frequency up to and above iron core NMR . Something probably happens there when whirl of magnetic fields reaches such level.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/magnetic/larmor.html

I can only guess that additional electrons are generated in circuit and because collector coils are bare and bigger they tend to accumulate here.

Now you should see why the simplest TPU device only work in one position.

[pauldude000]

@all

I hate to tear apart my tiny OU "mysterious resonant circuit" (I built one of EMD's devices) but I have and Idea I HAVE to try! I also want someone to hammer the ideas to as small of pieces as possible, but I ask them to accept the condition that superharmonics is responsible just for this instance..... If you can do that, then be welcome to sledge away!

One idea is this:
0. Two identical transistors, bases connected in parallel, collectors and emitters separate.
1. A simple ferrite toroidal transformer.
2. ONE feedback coil of nine turns feeding the base of both transistors.
3. TWO primaries.
4. One primary of 9 turns all the way around.
5. A second primary of 12 turns all the way around.
6. ONE secondary of heavier gauge of 12 turns all the way around.
7. The first primary being fed by a single ninevolt battery, resistance limited to say 300ma. (X volts due to voltage drop @ 300ma)
8. The second primary being fed by 3 nines in series, limited to a tiny amperage,( say 27V @ 10ma).

The second Idea is this:

1. Same toroid, feedback loop, transistors, and battery configuration as above
2. ONE primary of nine turns.
3. One secondary of nine turns.
4. Signal mixing after transistors via blocking diodes fed into primary.

Which is better, or any other simple suggestions to try?

Paul Andrulis

[pauldude000]

@Forest

It only seems complicated. It is actually "simple as snot" as a principle, so to speak.

The only thing more complex is calculating wire lengths...... (Which I built a program to do already, by the way. Search back through this thread and find the link to my website. All my electronics programs are there and are free for whomever wants them, and I have both a frequency to wavelength convertor, and a harmonic calculator which will do 1/4, 1/2, AND 1/3 ("true" or "superharmonic" resonant.)

You merely calculate the frequencies you need. I would use higher frequencies as they have shorter wavelengths, therefore shorter conductors. Make your base wavelength the longest. Then find the first and second harmonics of this frequency, and convert them to wavelengths for any necessary conductors required in your design. You are then good to go. Takes all of the guesswork out of it, and simplifies it to no end.

Winding coils and trying to attain results purely by accident is never a good way to go. Tesla would be the first to second this statement.

For instance, if you have ever built a three foot tall Tesla coil, and were amazed that you pulled a six or 12 inch arc off of it, then you completely wasted your time building a piece of junk. That thing should be kicking, not popping. To give you an idea, I have wound one on a toilet paper tube, the secondary the length of the tube minus an inch and a quarter. It was made of wire finer than a hair (40ga), with almost no capacitance for a top terminal, that put out 4" X 1/4" purple flamelike arcs, and would drown out VHF reception for over 100 feet. (Yes I shielded it later. )

There is no substitute for proper winding in a tuned device.

Tuned devices ALWAYS outstrip untuned devices in both functionality and performance.

ADDED:

Or, if you are using feedback to set resonance, you can also count the turns....... (but that is cheating)

Paul Andrulis

[giantkiller]

Ok So I go really simple.

2 signals down a wire.
Signal lengths are shorter than the wire.
The wire turn circumference is dependant on the width of the pulse. The shorter the pulse the longer the distance perpendicular to wire when the collapse event appears. Scalar.

As the 2 signals shift into and out of phase while tuning on and off we get our cataclismic event and only when the 2 pulses are going on or off

See what happens in space?

Now add a 3rd frequency

You can also run this with the frequency greater than the wire length. The idea being to use the cataclismic events in the field of another. It looks like DC bias.

Adding a spark gap is a good way to start. You can only use single layer coils. Any where they touch is another spark gap or short. Without the spark gap the high energy comes from the mixing of frequencies. 90 degree coupling is a reality.

This was what I wanted to build real big. I saw this as the key to the Philadelphia experiment.

--giantkiller. When done right the coil warms up but the body parts sting.