The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

[giantkiller]

giantkiller

Do you think there is electronic circuit in TPU ?

Here is whast has come since then.
You could use a blocking oscillator with 2 delays giving 3 frequencies. In the heterodyning tests that definately thumped the best. I tried 2 freqs and it didn't cut it. But that was with sine waves. The trailing edge of 3 square waves coinciding definately causes an event.

--giantkiller.

[sparks]

   

       I don't know if this link will explain any of my complex postings.    I believe that established physics is seriously flawed.  Crookes and Tesla were on the right road.  Unless we take plazma into consideration when considering any energy flow we are going to get more confused.   

                   http://plasmascience.net/tpu/AtHomeIn.html

    And home grown plazma     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCNNqgKqnaQ

[sparks]

  Seems someone else knew how to create plasma where they wanted it.  Please note temple of Dendrah.  Quite aways down the page.  The one with what appears to be 1/2of a Tesla Coil or a horseshoe magnet with the 4 spark gaps on top.  The lamp lit independently was achieved by Tesla back in the day as he walked about his stage wowing the hords.  I believe Tesla was planning on creating a stationary " lightning bolt" in his Wardenclyffe sending out electromagnetic density waves through the Earth Crust while at the same time creating a near ionosphere emanating from the top of the tower.  When he told JP Morgan he needed at least three of these to define an area coverage Morgan pulled the plug financially ruining and discrediting Tesla.

                                                     http://ancientskyscraper.com/

[pauldude000]

@sparks

I understand your viewpoint, I simply disagree with it. I know what the physics model says.... unfortunately.

It is taught that light is the carrier of all information. This can lead to all sorts of illusory phenomena. Most of it mental in nature. I am not saying you are mental sparks, but that what your rods and cones recieve is NOT the actuality of reality, but the reflected information of reality. The truck 500 feet away is not "right at your eyes", though the light reflected from it is.

The concept that "light is the carrier of all information" is not true, and has never been true. It is a carrier of some information, not all. There are five senses for a reason. ( For the purists, yes I know this is what you say, but it is NOT how you apply it. You apply it as ALL information, as if your very observance of a thing modifies the thing, or just because it is witnessed, it is reality. You are not god. All these effects were existent before man, and will continue after man. )

You sparks, do have a very sharp mind from what I see, but learn when to reject concepts as well as when to accept them. Concepts do not gain reality just because they are proposed, or even accepted. If so, then the world would be a flat sheet, and not a globe. The vast majority of all mankind for millenia (thousands of years) believed the earth to be just this, a flat sheet. If majority acceptance and deep belief created or modified reality, then we would live on a flat sheet still.

Nature bends to the will of man, it does not modify for the will of man.

Paul Andrulis

[pauldude000]

About Resonance

This is a special post, which I am going to do in a "paper" format.

Many have heard me talk and expound upon resonance. They may or may not have noticed that I made distinction by stating "True Resonance". Most obviously have assumed I refer simply to "oscillations", or even "resonance" as in an LC tank. Neither are true. I refer to resonance in the same manner as Nikola Tesla. This I call "True" resonance in respect to his understanding.

Resonance in physics is split into two separate categories. Namely linear and nonlinear resonance. True resonance resides in the nonlinear resonance section. Yet simply stating "nonlinear resonance" is not enough, since true resonance is a subset of nonlinear resonance. True resonance has a term in modern physics, which is "Superharmonic Resonance"........

It is based upon third harmonics, not quarter or half, and the effects are unique. The effects REQUIRE multiple signals of odd integer (3,9,etc...). Those who use the 3,6,9 principle accidentally stumble upon a couple of the frequencies, but also inject distorting frequencies into the mix. These frequencies are ALWAYS thirds, where 6 actually falls into a half principle in reference to a base third.

Instead of thinking "baseX2, X2" or "baseX4, X4", etc., think "baseX3, X3......."

These frequencies tend to sum together... NOT just in voltage.. The two signals tend to become a single signal. The base and the ninth have to be in phase. The third as controlling can be on freq, but out of phase, or can be on phase, but slightly off third.

For instance, You inject a high voltage extremely low current signal as the ninth. You then inject an extremely low voltage high current signal as the base frequency, upon which the ninth acts. You then use a slightly off signal HV third to regulate the overall out signal. Simple.

High voltage summing with high current. Wattage in could be 10 watts for either signal. Output would be Voltage (signal 3 or "ninth") X Amperage (signal 1 or "base"). Energy is conserved. The law is not broken.

NOWHERE IN PHYSICS IS IT STATED THAT WORK (power or "watts") IS CONSERVED. There is no "conservation of work" law, only "conservation of energy".

I hope that you have found this interesting info.

More info from a physics site concerning nonlinear resonance and superharmonics.

http://monet.physik.unibas.ch/~elmer/pendulum/nonres.htm#super

Paul Andrulis