Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations

Started by Pirate88179, April 09, 2008, 09:43:54 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 19 Guests are viewing this topic.

sm0ky2

i soaked my stubblefield and connected across steel wire on the bottom (-) and top copper wire (+)
leaving the other two leads open

it puts out 0.6v @ 8-12 ma

im now powering my JT circuit from this alone, as i have completely dissconnected it from the earth battery.

stubblefield and JT circuit are sitting on a glass table, in full operation as a stand-alone unit.

Success !!!!!

next step is to perfect the process of coiling stubblefields, and see if i can interlink several of them somehow...
I was fixing a shower-rod, slipped and hit my head on the sink. When i came to, that's when i had the idea for the "Flux Capacitor", Which makes Perpetual Motion possible.

jeanna

Quote from: sm0ky2 on August 07, 2009, 05:08:16 PM
i soaked my stubblefield and connected across steel wire on the bottom (-) and top copper wire (+)
leaving the other two leads open
Good job!
Yes, that is how he said to do it.
Those are the 5,6. The wires that you started with he called the 10 wires so even though they belong to te same piece of wire they are called the 10's

He said these must be let alone.


QuoteSuccess !!!!!
So excellent.

Quotenext step is to perfect the process of coiling stubblefields, and see if i can interlink several of them somehow...
And you can see from MY results what happens when you link them according to the picture of him talking on his wireless phone with one wire on the ground going to a grounded coil in opposite directions.
I have a pic.

jeanna

Cap-Z-ro


Could the chemicals in tap water have a negative effect on the cell, as opposed to naturally distilled and mineralized ground water ?

I recall that NS had wires coiled around the roots and branches of trees...could the 2 loose ends be connected there ?

Exciting to follow gang.

Regards...


Pirate88179

Cap:

Good point to raise but I don't think so.  Because the ground water run-off is not pure and distilled as was the rain water that fell.  Once it goes through earth's filters, it becomes pure again and I don't think his cells were buried that deep.

But, on the other hand, back then, way less pesticides and other ground surface pollutants and less acid rain so....maybe you are right that to replicate the rain he had back then, we might indeed need distilled water.

As I said...good point.

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

protonmom

Jeanna...I think you misread what Smoky2 said.  He says he connected the neg AT THE BOTTOM to the pos AT THE TOP.

>I soaked my stubblefield and connected across steel wire on the bottom (-) and top copper wire (+)
leaving the other two leads open <

Doesn't that mean he connected one of the 10's with one of the 5/6's?
So, if that is the case then he did not leave the 10's alone.  Or, did I read that wrong?