Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations

[resonanceman]

Hi Resonanceman,



> I can see that I am going to have to put  making a tesla coil on my list of stuff to do .

The monopolar electron pump.

The radioactive decay drive is just to show that it
should be possible to be done with electron disintegration
(electron/positron).

and then, to wonder about inverse generator mode, neutrino capture (not very good, it could disintegrate matter). And now to ZPE.

Its funny that 20% of Tesla?s wireless energy system could possibly be just sitting here on this open source site, and there?s been not one comment.
Strange isn?t it?

Cliff,

You might  try  explaining   your   drawings a little more .


or  better yet  show  an attempt  at  a working model .......  builders  here  get alot more respect  than   people with theories .  Even  if the theories are  really  good .

gary

[argona369]

You don?t think the Electron shuttle looks like Tesla?s wireless energy?
(the missing transmitter)
sad, and hostile.
i deal with electrostatics. i have a 30 cm Wimshurst i built.
does that count as "builder"?

Cliff,

Hi Resonanceman,



> I can see that I am going to have to put  making a tesla coil on my list of stuff to do .

The monopolar electron pump.

The radioactive decay drive is just to show that it
should be possible to be done with electron disintegration
(electron/positron).

and then, to wonder about inverse generator mode, neutrino capture (not very good, it could disintegrate matter). And now to ZPE.

Its funny that 20% of Tesla?s wireless energy system could possibly be just sitting here on this open source site, and there?s been not one comment.
Strange isn?t it?

Cliff,

You might  try  explaining   your   drawings a little more .

or  better yet  show  an attempt  at  a working model .......  builders  here  get alot more respect  than   people with theories .  Even  if the theories are  really  good .

gary

[jeanna]

I have just received and read a copy of the Stubblefield book by Lochte.

BTW I did not read every word. I am a slow reader, but I skimmed all parts of the book searching for paragraphs that refer to the earlier battery. The focus of the book is on the wireless and radio invention question.

I only found the first page of a brochure about the battery which contains only part of the whole text.

I emailed the author and asked him if he had the rest of the brochure and if he had anything else that has to do with this invention we are replicating.

Here is what is interesting that is in that brochure.

1- he refers to negative and positive elements being the copper and iron. (in that order)

2- He claims that even in water - non acidulated water= not vinegar- there is no polarization that occurs as does in all other batteries.

     This is very good news. It means that even if we don't get all the invention perfected, we can actually use it and it will not wear out by becoming polarized. I think this is MAJOR.

3- There is something more, as in more power which happens when it is in the earth that he will describe later. Later is not in the book which is why I emailed the author.

4- He says that an amount less than 1 volt is produced from one coil but they can be put in series to add more power.. Now, this was not written by an ad man this is in NS's own words, as far as anyone can tell. He uses the word we for who is selling the battery so who knows who we means? but I think these 3 (soon to be 4) points are very worthwhile and if there can be more from the rest of the brochure, I sure hope the author will allow us to get the information.

This is good news, Is it not?

jeanna

[Pirate88179]

@ Jeanna:

Excellent!  I believe this is the same book Maddog was telling me about.  Sounds like some great information there.  I will try to locate a copy.

Bill

[Pirate88179]

@ All:

In case you have not seen these, here are two more youtube videos that are somewhat related
to our work here.  Just food for thought.



http://youtube.com/watch?v=JaLcyFg3BXA&feature=related

http://youtube.com/watch?v=hWnMReMXq5Q&feature=related

Bill

PS  If anyone spots a semi-related video somewhere that I have missed, please feel free to post the links here.  I never thought of running a calculator from any of my cells, or charging my cell phone.