HIGH QUALITY TPU DVD Video Released from Jack Durban

[wattsup]

@kames and poynt99

This would eventually have to be tested both ways otherwise we'll be going back and forth forever. Just know that on the right toroid there is another wire going into the toroid side bundle making five wires in the bundle. See my third image above.

@Vortex1

Nice circuit. I tried the other day something similar.

I have tried approaching a magnet to many types of bucking and other types of toroids and measured power output of the toroid. None. Zilch. Nada. We know all the devices ran off batteries so there is no shame in doing the same. So you wil need a power source.

"It would be great if wattsup could take his very diligently created pictorial and turn it into a schematic."
I don't understand what you mean by this.

[Vortex1]

Hi Wattsup

Sorry if I wasn't clear in  what I was trying to convey. I think you have done a great job in meticulously tracing out all the wiring in the SM17 . This must have been many painstaking hours of effort and careful scrutiny.

I was merely suggesting that a schematic would clarify a few things. With your permission I will try to take elements of your SM17-D1 and put them into schematic format.

Thanks for all your hard work.........V

[aleks]

After reading a bit more about magnetostrictive materials, it seems that many materials used for toroidal cores are magnetostrictive, with a comparably high magnetomechanical coupling coefficient (around 0.3).

E.g. Nickel, CoNi, AlFe, NiCoFe.

So, if the hypothesis of acoustic stimulation is valid, core composed of any of these materials should produce required performance. So, not just Terfenol-D is usable. Beside that it seems that permanent magnet biasing may be used for achieving a better magnetomechanical coupling.

And one more "better" MSM material:
http://web.mit.edu/bobohand/www/gerver/www/fsma/b/index.html

Also interesting is that this article notes that laminated MSM perform better with AC - that may be the reason why SM's TPUs are laminated (even the open TPU looks like a laminated ring). So, if SM used "custom" designed cores, this could pretty well describe why they were laminated with a tape by hand. Not to hide anything, but to improve performance.

[aleks]

Sorry for ranting, but if magnetostrictive nature of the effect is valid, SM TPU may be seen as a device similar to Keely's motor, because as I've studied it, Keely's motor solely depends on mechanical resonance and accumulation of mechanical energy in the system - I did a more involved post here on Overunity.com before about my understanding of Keely's motor - check my posts if you are interested - however, at that time I made no connection with magnetic fields.

Now, if you pretend Keely's motor internal mechanical resonance produced "overunity" AC magnetic oscillation, you'll quickly see how SM TPU and Keely's motor can be similar. Keely attached this AC field to drive a motor. SM used it to generate electricity. Both are misunderstood, both were supposedly working.

Well, to describe my idea from a bit different perspective... First of all, acoustic mode that produces a destructive interference produces an area of a very small density within the matter - it almost cuts a piece of metal into two parts. If you add Casimir force (which appears inbetween two closely-standing metallic plates having the same charge) into equation you'll probably understand where overunity may appear. Now just stop (or change the phase of) the acoustic stimulation at regular intervals and you'll get a varying Casimir force. This force may supposedly affect surrounding matter and may manifest itself as ambient force field - it may not be a force that just works between the plates as theory tells - it has to affect any surrounding matter I think. Just pretend this force is non-reactive - i.e. when it interacts with external fields it does not move plates, and viola - you have a source of pure overunity. (do not say anyone I told this )

[wattsup]

@Vortex1

You don't need my persmission but thanks for asking. A little while back, in possible anticipation that some would have interest in making a circuit diagram, I had posted the following as quoted and copied below in the other JD thread located here.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4299.msg85290.html#msg85290

QUOTE
I have put up my wiring diagram based on the Large TPU - LTPU.

I would hope that forum members could use this as a standard guideline when formulating theories of operation, etc. Look guys, this is the nut and bolts reality of the LTPU as it is known today. Not the theory, no grand postulations, no deformations, just the reality of the apparatus itself.

Hopefully..............................................................technical drawing guys here will start a new thread called SM17-WD-XX Wiring Diagram, and convene together on a common circuit drawing program that all can use so that you can exchange the editable master that could be edited by more and more to put in the coils. If you take my drawing and put it in circuit diagram form and from there you can work out the coiling scheme you're halfway there.
UNQUOTE

So if you feel up to it, maybe start a new thread so you control the first post where you can post your first circuit diagram interpretation using a mutually convened program so others can then help in the process. This way you control the first post and can update the circuit diagram for quick reference by all and also keep available a copy of the working file on the same first post. Use the XX as the version number.

I am sure that once guys see a current diagram in a true schematic form, even if it has open areas, it will give the guys a more intuitive look at the TPU and hopefully more directly related ideas will come from it.

@alex

How much power do you think one would need to create such a magnetorestrictive action (MRA). Is the power level small enough to fit inside a TPU? If the TPU does not use batteries, then any theory would have to start with 0 volts and work its way up. If it does use batteries, then the theory would have to start at that voltage level and work its way up. If the theory requires power that goes above and beyond any feasible power availability in a TPU, then the theory should be dropped or shown to comply in a new way to the TPU.

I know we all consider the gyroscopic effect of the TPUs and this can be thought of as an MRA, but it could also simply be the action of continuously pulsing a left then right coil. You may physically feel the pusling action but it does not mean it is an intentional MRA, but a byproduct of the overall effects.