Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



HIGH QUALITY TPU DVD Video Released from Jack Durban

Started by Jdo300, April 14, 2008, 02:40:29 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Feynman

i do not think that is correct. (calc must be done w/ powers of two)

fB : base frequency 
fH : harmonic frequency
M : Multiple
O : Octave

fB = 7.8hz
fH = 3,993.6hz

M = fH / fB
M = 3993.6hz / 7.8hz
M = 512

Harmonic is 512x multiple of the base.

How many octaves up is this harmonic?
2^x = fH / fB = M
x = log2(fH/fB)
x = log2(512)
x = ln(512)/ln(2)
x = 9

fH is nine octaves above fB.   

aka
7.8 * (2^n) will give "octaves", where n = octave


PS
thanks for info on sine/square/saw FT differences

aleks

Quote from: Feynman on May 01, 2008, 04:55:24 PM
aka
7.8 * (2^n) will give "octaves", where n = octave
Well, OK, you are right in this sense. However, physically it is much irrelevant since physical processes deal with harmonics mainly.

turbo

Quote from: EMdevices on May 01, 2008, 02:25:35 PM

P.S.  @Marco,   I not sure what you're looking at there, but there is no frequency content in the buzzing above 5 kHz,  there is however a continuous 12 kHz and 17 kHz  (approx)   frequency that I see, which is not part of the buzzing sound, so I condensed the chart to the frequencies you see.   I'll have to analyze the old video sounds, maybe they're different, which would mean distortion  introduced due to resampling to a lower bit rate perhaps.


EM

I know what i analyzed.
The images are a crystal clear representation of the sounds made by the coils.
I do remember analyzing more then one take from diffrent coils and i am not shure which one you analyzed.
Steven stated in one of his video's the coil was running close to 5500 hertz which match the spectral graph quite perfect.
These signals are so clear and so close that it cannot be distortion.

I like the idea Aleks presented about the square wave and the harmonics.

If i can find some spare time i will fire up the gear i used to analyze the video's once again and note the time stamps so we can compare our findings.

M.

EMdevices

oh,  so you might have analyzed sound from other sections, interesting.   I thought it was only the mini TPU that buzzed.

nice deduction there aleks, 

EM

EMdevices

back side view,  notice the double strand is clearly visible, AND the winding direction  :)

EM