Feynman makes a Bedini Motor

[willitwork]

I'm the guy saying it won't work you are saying it does. I'm saying prove it. You refuse.

Here is an illustration:

If Bill says he knows where bigfoot lives and Jack says bigfoot does not exist Bill is the one who needs to come up with the evidence.

If Bill insults Jack and demands that Jack prove bigfoot does not exist while all the time Bill insists that bigfoot is real it is not Jack who has the problem.

If Bell takes Jack and other witnesses to bigfoots lair, Bill will be a hero.

If he doesn't, well Jack won't be the mad fool.


PS, which Bedini circuit are you using? How many magnets etc? I think I asked you that earlier.

[WilbyInebriated]

I'm the guy saying it won't work you are saying it does. I'm saying prove it. You refuse.

Here is an illustration:

If Bill says he knows where bigfoot lives and Jack says bigfoot does not exist Bill is the one who needs to come up with the evidence.

If Bill insults Jack and demands that Jack prove bigfoot does not exist while all the time Bill insists that bigfoot is real it is not Jack who has the problem.

If Bell takes Jack and other witnesses to bigfoots lair, Bill will be a hero.

If he doesn't, well Jack won't be the mad fool.


PS, which Bedini circuit are you using? How many magnets etc? I think I asked you that earlier.

i haven't claimed anything of the sort. i have been correcting your mistakes mostly.

I OWE YOU NOTHING.

here is an illustration. willit says it won't work and being all scientific and all he doesn't have to replicate it exactly. if willit thinks this is an insult he is a dumbass. if willit says it won't work he needs to have a replication and some data to show, if he doesn't willit will be the talking fool.

i answered what circuit i was using. you never asked boo shit about the magnets. how about you start answering some of my questions.

like where is this $10 pulse charge circuit?

and the "anectdotal account" according to the talking head PMM. you say it confirms your position and he says its inadmissible... how is that possible?

you say "Substantial load is any load that would make the Bedini anything more than a device that pulse charges batteries" and then you say a light and a motor are loads.... which the bedini sg will run... why are you contradicting yourself?

so you didn't replicate the sg at all did you?

prediction: you will continue to avoid answering and fall back to that imaginary "burden of proof" shit. typical, i noticed utilitarian fell back to that same lame bastion when i called him out on his bullshit too. can't even produce specs for his "charge monitoring circuit", sounds much like your $10 charger...



PS still waiting on that $10 dollar pulse charger that is powered by the battery that it is charging...

[WilbyInebriated]

here is what pmsdave, willitwork, utilitarian and others are engaging in and calling "science"...

5.  Adopting a prejudiced stance against a theory or an observed phenomena without first investigating the details, then using this as justification for refusing to investigate the details.

      "Your ideas are obviously garbage.  What, try to replicate your
      evidence?  I wouldn't soil my hands.  And besides, it would be
      a terrible waste of time and money, since there's no question about
      the outcome."

      or "I didn't need to because I know a pulse charge when I see one."

see http://amasci.com/pathsk2.txt

[willitwork]

Does this constitute a claim that your Bedini works?

"i can charge all sorts of batteries, LAB's perform best"
and
"yes, and run a load off of it. most any battery type."

The second question is the answer to: "Can you flatten the target battery and recharge it?"

I read your two answers as admissions that the system works. The test I am after is that you completely flatten the battery connected to the cathode of the diode then start the Bedini and fully charge it, but you intimate that you have been able to do this.

- you have been holding out on us



The standard SG generates loss through the 10 ohm resistor, the 1K Pot, the lamp and the base to emitter junction. Have you considered any changes to minimize those losses? A 2n3055 has low gain which could be augmented by adding a silicon NPN in darlington configuration. The NEON is also wasteful. A higher voltage transistor or a switching fet would remove the need for the diode and increase efficiency as well.

[WilbyInebriated]

Does this constitute a claim that your Bedini works?

"i can charge all sorts of batteries, LAB's perform best"
and
"yes, and run a load off of it. most any battery type."

The second question is the answer to: "Can you flatten the target battery and recharge it?"

I read your two answers as admissions that the system works. The test I am after is that you completely flatten the battery connected to the cathode of the diode then start the Bedini and fully charge it, but you intimate that you have been able to do this.

- you have been holding out on us



The standard SG generates loss through the 10 ohm resistor, the 1K Pot, the lamp and the base to emitter junction. Have you considered any changes to minimize those losses? A 2n3055 has low gain which could be augmented by adding a silicon NPN in darlington configuration. The NEON is also wasteful. A higher voltage transistor or a switching fet would remove the need for the diode and increase efficiency as well.

you can read my answers however you like, still waiting for your answers though...AGAIN

the test you are after is a long wait for a train that ain't coming... it's easy, you said so yourself. as i have said numerous times, get on it. run your own damn test. i owe you nothing. acta non verba, you talking head.
i haven't been holding out on you at all, you simply refused to follow directions and/or replicate.

great, "improvements" from someone who hasn't built one...  LMFAO


PS still waiting on that $10 dollar pulse charger that is powered by the battery that it is charging...