Young Bangladeshi Scientist's success story Power generation without fuel

[pennies_everywhere]

@Grumpy, you are a hoot!  Since you believe in things for which there is no evidence, may I interest you in a ride on Mary Yugo's invisible flying pink unicorn?  I really am quite happy to take your non-refundable deposit CIA.

Kachi fails to show anything extraordinary.  But if you think fake magic acts are the real deal, offer to send him the money he asks for.  Maybe you can even use that ride on Mary's unicorn to hand deliver the cash to him.

I see you have nothing more to offer in this discussion.  You cling to the cliff of CoE - which you vaguely understand.  If the question of the source of all of the energ in the universe can not be answered then no one can say that energy convertion devices do not work as claimed.  So, until you can answer the previous question - your claims that energy conversion devices are "fake" or "poppycock" or "scams" is mute.

This is the first thing that little copper-tops like you will never figure out: "time" is not constant

So, with "time" now a variable field, CoE is no longer a problem

(rumor has it that Einstein could not handle the math required to make time variable - who knows for sure?  In his later years he stated this:
)

[pennies_everywhere]

@allcanadian if you are a believer that CoE will be turned on its head "in the near future" then you sound like a perfect investor for MPI.  If not MPI, Bearden, Bedini, Newman, Lee, will all take your dough.  And they really promise it's all going to happen "real soon".  Never mind they've claimed that for 25 years.

It seems that modern 3D solvers have little difficulty computing nearly exact solutions out to many GHz, confirmed with rigorously designed and tested measurements.  Those solvers all premise on the "textbook" EM theory you, grumpy, jibbguy like to decry.  When you can establish an experiment that doesn't conform to established EM theory, notify the folks in Sweden.

@Grumpy
That Einstein quote may be the best I have ever heard
I had to laugh at this statement as well--  

I think most of the textbook answers pennies_everywhere has provided will fall like a house of cards in the near future.I have studied physics, quantum mechanics and found too many inconsistencies too many assumptions being made. One of the more laughable was Young's Duality, what a farce, many physics students I have talked to don't believe this pile of rubbish either.

@pennies_everywhere
you may want to re-read Teslas work and I do not believe scalar waves have anything to do with the effects I have measured. One error being made is in using the wrong instruments, if one were to use a passive bi-polar electrostatic charge detector you would know the nature of the fields as well you would know the fields are three dimensional having defined geometries--- unlike the simplistic models you see in your textbooks.

[Bobbotov]

Isn't "Dopey" what Bobbotov means?  Not sure of the language, Swahili perhaps.

Hey, I see from this post of your's that you do accept the possibility of "discoveries" - so hope is still in sight.

Aw, you're a fan, saving my old Peak Oil posts and everything. Must have a great scrapbook. Besides what I wrote then was spot on. Thanks for the trip down memory lane.

[pennies_everywhere]

@jibbguy I don't think it's sharks you need to be concerned with.  You sound more and more like some worms have devoured your brain.

There is no mysterious missing or extra energy when one compresses gas in a volume.  Every Joule is readily accounted for, and it all balances out.  The idea that there is extra energy is yours alone.  If you believe your idea, write a paper, include a reproducible experiment, and wait for that Nobel Prize.

As to antenna and EM theory and its application to underground antennae, about the only thing you've latched onto that has a bit of truth to it is that there are more propagation modes than TEM.  BFD.  TEM is great on two layer circuit boards without vias.  Everywhere else, we have to deal with other modes.  EM theory still holds just fine.

If you really believe the conspiracy theories you espouse, you had best get a better tin foil helmut.  You see the latest development in psychotronic mind control submodulates the waves so as to penetrate even the best triple thick Reynolds Wrap and Scotch tape headwear such as someone like yourself might don daily. 

@Pennies: Since you have no real answers, just tap-dance moves with nothing to back them.... it would appear you are the one lost in a sea of reason... And the sharks are circling

The heat energy CREATED by compression comes from "nowhere" at least in terms of 1867 pre-atomic theory. Any inference to the contrary is added by those who only are wishing the CoE Law covered it as a means of protecting their world-view; but they have absolutely nothing to prove this statement, and so instead endlessly repeat dogmatic denials that are meaningless. Imo, heat from compression is the crack in the Law that will allow other cracks to be someday admitted and examined, finally.

Underground coupling would be "impossible" by accepted transverse EM theory... If you were a "Tesla expert", you would know that Wardenclyffe had little to do with transverse EM coupling; "Traditional" wireless radio was just the "cover story" that was put out after the fact to help suppress what was really being tried there. Underground radio reception and other subterranean "non-transverse EM" energy-related phenomena like power transmission through the ground is a topic that has been dodged and hushed-up by mainstream science for over 100 years. The Navy may have utilized it, but they won't address the strange anomalies it represents (at least openly).

Because Pennies, here is the logic trap you are in: If resonance and coupling were used by Tesla as the primary means of transmitting non-transverse EM, "radiant", energy... Then your world is officially rocked
___________________________

To believe everything that exists is explainable by current means and neatly fits within a stated scientific model may be comforting... But it is risky: The chances of being proved wrong, over and over again, grow every day.... As long as mainstream science remains locked in frozen dogma and unwilling to accept the possibility of their own failure (...not a very scientific method, is it?).

Therefor, dis'ing this possibly very brave and ingenious Bangladeshi scientist without anything to back you is not only wrong and prone to failure, it is unscientific. Don't believe it until you see it; that's fine and proper. But don't automatically discount it, either. This mental mindset is more important than just a mysterious invention in a far-off place: Breaking the knee-jerk negative attitudes is what will be required to finally get "free energy" and other suppressed technologies and medical treatments into the mainstream.

[Bobbotov]

If you really believe the conspiracy theories you espouse, you had best get a better tin foil helmut.  You see the latest development in psychotronic mind control submodulates the waves so as to penetrate even the best triple thick Reynolds Wrap and Scotch tape headwear such as someone like yourself might don daily. 

I think this might be just the ticket:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2251/1527740450_a14f225494.jpg?v=0