Young Bangladeshi Scientist's success story Power generation without fuel

[Grumpy]

@Grumpy if you want to have long philosophical discussions on Noether's Theorem and whether it implies that there might be a way to violate CoE, then I think the Steorn Forums are the place for you.  Of course you'll want to decide whether Steorn's never seen free energy machine works by the static path some magnets follow around a closed path as first claimed, or works by waving magnets back and forth at different speeds as they later claimed, or only works when there isn't much energy around as they claimed after their failed demonstration. 

I see you have nothing more to offer in this discussion.  You cling to the cliff of CoE - which you vaguely understand.  If the question of the source of all of the energ in the universe can not be answered then no one can say that energy convertion devices do not work as claimed.  So, until you can answer the previous question - your claims that energy conversion devices are "fake" or "poppycock" or "scams" is mute.

This is the first thing that little copper-tops like you will never figure out: "time" is not constant

So, with "time" now a variable field, CoE is no longer a problem

(rumor has it that Einstein could not handle the math required to make time variable - who knows for sure?  In his later years he stated this:

"If the speed of light is the least bit affected by the speed of the light source, then my whole theory of relativity and theory of gravity is false."

"I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field concept,i.e., on continuous structures. In that case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics."

)

[Bobbotov]

>So, until you can answer the previous question - your claims that energy conversion devices are "fake" or "poppycock" or "scams" is mute.

Ah, the term is MOOT. Mute means not being able to talk. I just thought someone who knows the secrets of the universe should know the correct usage of a common English word.

[allcanadian]

@Grumpy
That Einstein quote may be the best I have ever heard
I had to laugh at this statement as well--

Your clever attempt to dodge this question is a futile attempt to hide the emptiness of your endless banter.  To admit energy "conversion" or "creation" would nullify your reasons for existence and result in your successful suicide.

 

I think most of the textbook answers pennies_everywhere has provided will fall like a house of cards in the near future.I have studied physics, quantum mechanics and found too many inconsistencies too many assumptions being made. One of the more laughable was Young's Duality, what a farce, many physics students I have talked to don't believe this pile of rubbish either.

@pennies_everywhere
you may want to re-read Teslas work and I do not believe scalar waves have anything to do with the effects I have measured. One error being made is in using the wrong instruments, if one were to use a passive bi-polar electrostatic charge detector you would know the nature of the fields as well you would know the fields are three dimensional having defined geometries--- unlike the simplistic models you see in your textbooks.

[Grumpy]

>So, until you can answer the previous question - your claims that energy conversion devices are "fake" or "poppycock" or "scams" is mute.

Ah, the term is MOOT. Mute means not being able to talk. I just thought someone who knows the secrets of the universe should know the correct usage of a common English word.

The use of "mute" was a "Freudian slip" - stick that in your English-literary-genious-wanna-be pipe and smoke on it - Boobotov.

What does "secrets of the universe" and English have to do with each other? - absolutely nothing.

[Bobbotov]

What does "secrets of the universe" and English have to do with each other? - absolutely nothing.

Yeah they do. You know nothing about either.