Roll on the 20th June

[ramset]

wow just got back from Fathers day with the HULK [not bad] this seems alot like the movie GGGRRRRRRR   Boss don,t let these guy,s get your blood pressure up    its not worth it   Chet

[purepower]

on Archer's video 2 of his third set, at about the 1:30 point we clearly witness an overunity lift of the lever.
this is done with the lever being weighted so the short end is heavier than the long end, by at least a few kilos, then an extra 5.3 kilos are added, and the load is lifted by 1 kilo on the other end.  How is this done?
I have been searching for a way to explain this lift mathamaticly,  but so far have had no luck.
Your help with this would be much appreciated.

thanks,  Dirt

Sorry I may have brushed you off before. I dont really like talking about Archer's device specifically but will more than happily discuss any principals or fundamentals. But by special request, I will break my own policy.

I watched through the vids again, and I still fail to see any magic.

In the first vid, he shows us a system easily capable of lifting a load of 20 kg.

So why is it so amazing he can then use it to lift a little more, just not quite as easily? If it had been "maxed out" with 20, and then mysteriously lifted 25, I might give it a little more consideration.

But the truth is the lever was not maxed out to start.

What if I said I could bench 200 lbs and then did it, but right after benched 250? Would you be surprised and say I defied physics? No, you would just assume I always had the ability to bench 250...

See the parallel?

-PurePower

[sm0ky2]

@ Exx,

    What did you think of my idea to use "square rods" with (Not Your) Linear Bearings?

[fletcher]

He gave us all of the information, early on in the thread. its everyone else's conjecture and bullshit that is confusing the issue.
It's actually a rather simple concept.

I'm glad you understand it sm0key - yes, I would say what we've seen so far is an awfully simple concept - it appears to me [& I'm not building it of course - been there, done that, someone else's turn] that it's still missing an ingredient - once you add the magic pixie dust though, she'll be right 

Seriously guys - good on yuh for trying to make this concept a reality to prove or disprove quinn's claims of OU - that's the scientific & credible approach - hard data, undeniable & unequivocal ! - let's hope 'the boss' doesn't let you down & comes thru with the 'tweaks' I suspect everyone's going to need to get their's working 

[MrKai]

Are you drunk?

Why is any of this directed at me?

Hey...here is an idea...

Answer tekylife's post. This would be useful and credible.

Your constant ad hominem attacks do not in any way a Sword of God make.

Again ARCHER YOU...HAVE...THE...FLOOR...

Use it to produce something credible or just post your spew on your website.

You aren't "hurting" me or "busting my credibility" you because I HAVEN'T CLAIMED TO HAVE A WORLD-SAVING MACHINE AND BACKED IT UP WITH YOUTUBE VIDEOS SHOWING ANYTHING BUT.

That would be YOOOOOOUUUU. ARCHER QUINNN.

So until you produce what you said you would, *especially in light of your backpedaling, changing of your website, cursing fits and other petulant acts of attention whoring* you haven't got a THING "on" me buddy, do ya' hear?

Show ONE, ONE POST where I have made any incredible claim about history, energy, math or physics, then attempted to bs my way thru with psychobabble and flawed math.

You can't. It isn't there.

Stop projecting. Start proving. You can't discredit me...I haven't proclaimed myself the Savior of the Monkeys wielding the heretofore mythical Sword of God.

Again...that would be you. Get it right.

-K

just like purepower, has never been able to overcome the fake math for the torque, it is time to put down kai as the lying dog you are and let the world see you are a fraud, a liar, and cannot supply that which you claimed in abudance.

not one devivce thatcould you name.

as for mine rare earth magnetic and magmetic rocks wer not invented nor was the rolling log of a tree, for that matter a one armed version with a spike though the middle is not a wheel anyway, ya dickhead.

the automoble has an electric spark plug, i could mention deisel, but hey that would be unfair as he was, yes lasies and gentlemen another fucking tinkerer. you also said steam engine yep you guessed it another fucking tinkerer, seems your guys inveted fuckall, that did not rely on us as your rock, you learning base and centre of all wisdom.

now to put you down as the dog you are.

I have never in my life claimed Old Albert stole any ideas from anyone else fuckwit, he was a genius to which i stated, had he lived through the days of particle accelerators would have seen the error of that one theory, he had many.

you confuse scientists with scumbags, it is newton who stole objects in motion from galileo, calculus from archimedes, and the energy in equals energy out horshit is destroyed by the machines available for sale right now. so he had nothing, solved nothing and his laws are bullshit.

so to claim i had ever said such things shows you as the oil supporting scum you are. fabricating statements, i at least paste your own words.

you lie and fabricate false stories, and you cannot provide one example of such a vast claim, already supposed to exist.

as i said just one. and you can't.

you may lean on the dummies, as it is your nature and historical records show true, just stop dribbling on our shoulders thanks.