Roll on the 20th June

[Newtonian God]

   you just dont get clown

No Archer, you're the clown and YOU don't get it.

Just in case you missed it, people on this planet have resorted to eating dirt to survive.

Rising Food Costs Force Haiti's Poor to Resort to Eating Dirt
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22902512/
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory?id=4212012

If Archer had not destroyed his only working perpetual motion machine prototype two years ago, starving people in the world today would instead be eating fresh vegetables and drinking clean water. What make more sense to you, saving someone from starvation or the 'possibly' of putting an Arab out of work? Any fool knows the correct choice. Only a jackass would not!

So WTF are you doing wasting your time here having petty arguments over what uneducated people have and have not invented? People are dieing from starvation right now you stupid fool! After all, you had a working perpetual motion machine two years ago that you destroyed. Right? So what's taking you so freakin long to rebuild it and show the world?

You never answer any of the important direct questions. Instead you gloss over them and choose to incoherently ramble on about nothing. I know that you are not going to deliver a damn thing on June 20th. (For those that have missed it, Archer is waiting until June 20th because that is his birthday.) Yes, I guess those kids have eaten dirt this long, what's just a few more days for them to wait and stroke Archer's ego?

You have contributed nothing positive to those here looking for real energy solution. In fact, you have several people here chasing rainbows when they could be doing something constructive that might someday contribute to society. Take poor Chet for example. Archer, you have been exposed for what you really are. You're an obvious fraud and a liar!

Newton 1, Archer 0

--
Newtonian God
"You can believe in perpetual motion and be thought a fool, or you can believe in Archer Quinn and remove all doubt."

[purepower]

just like purepower, has never been able to overcome the fake math for the torque

Then enlighten me oh Mighty Archer, what is the real math for torque?

as for mine rare earth magnetic and magmetic rocks wer not invented nor was the rolling log of a tree, for that matter a one armed version with a spike though the middle is not a wheel anyway, ya dickhead.

...

the automoble has an electric spark plug

So a rolling tree with a spike isnt a wheel, what does this have to do with you STEALING THE LEVER AND WHEEL?

If the automobile isnt an invention because of an electric spark plug, then you have not invented ANYTHING because every single component of everything you have done has existed prior to your application. Case and point.

-PurePower

PS Spark plug was invented by Tesla. Mind quoting your sources for the diesel and steam engine? I call your bluff...

If inventions arent inventions because one simple component or premise existed before hand (car from spark plug, spark plug from electricity, electricity from B Franklin),  then there is no such thing as an invention unless it is a new material. Since everything ever built or invented has been made of materials that existed before hand, then the discoverer of those materials deserve credit for everything that is to follow (if you want to buy into Archurian logic).

PPS Still no link?

[sm0ky2]

They're all preparing to join quinn & fall on their swords [S.O.G's that is] LOL.

No, seriously, its good that they are trying to replicate but you can hardly call it replication when the information is incomplete to start with.

He gave us all of the information, early on in the thread. its everyone elses conjecture and bullshit that is confusing the issue.
It's actually a rather simple concept.

[dirt diggler]

@ PurePower:

I don't want to press you, but a few days ago, I asked for some help with the math of the lever.  I was wondering (since you are around tonite) if you could take a look and let me know what you think.  previously you had brushed off my question with a claim of fraud, but I don't think that was justified.
just so you don't have to search back for my question, here it is:
on Archer's video 2 of his third set, at about the 1:30 point we clearly witness an overunity lift of the lever.
this is done with the lever being weighted so the short end is heavier than the long end, by at least a few kilos, then an extra 5.3 kilos are added, and the load is lifted by 1 kilo on the other end.  How is this done?
I have been searching for a way to explain this lift mathamaticly,  but so far have had no luck.
Your help with this would be much appreciated.

thanks,  Dirt

[purepower]

Oh Archer, you fell apart on that last post...

so in the real world, would not a "GENUINE" person who wants to contribute, go to a thread that they understand and could share their vast knowledge and help, what good is it trying to stop something that you say doesnt work? if it doesnt work, common sense says there is nothing to stop?!!

As I recall, I have given MUCH positive contribution on the wheel. I do think there is potential, but I dont think you are going to finish it. That's why I have shared my "vas knowledge and help." So I must be a genuine person living in the real world, where is it you live?

so whay are you not doing the right thing and helping the world finish other machines??? why are you here?? becuase you have an agenda, to stop unpatented free energy machines that might work???

And stop free energy machines that "might work?" "MIGHT WORK?" Was this a little slip up Archie?

And if I were out to stop, why would I give advice and have input? If the gov and oilmen were out to stop, do you really think their strongest move would be a college student chatting online? Your fake FE predecessors had better stories than that, Archie...

Do you see any reputable people here of note saying it wont work?? no, i dont

do i see any photos of any newtonians with their real names??? i dont. the only thing lurking here are those with no balls.

i have no balls? show us you name and photo, and i will proclaim you king of the thread and leave forever. you want it??? you want me shut up?? what was it you said, how i was slowing down progress,  show us your balls little boy.

this is the realm of the real men.

name and photo or... FUCK OFF

Come to think of it Archie, YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE WITH A NAME AND PIC UP, NEWTONIAN OR ARCHURIAN.

Does that make all of your followers fake men too?

No one is going to make their privet information public for one reason: identity theft. Happened to me once, never again.


"show us your balls little boy"

I think wanting to see the balls of a little boy is illegal in most places, not to mention weird...

And you would really leave the thread, abandoning all of your followers just to see my pic? Wow, what a loyal leader...

-PurePower