Roll on the 20th June

[broli]

This forum needs a user modding system. Where people can rate a post. If the post is getting a too negative rating it just gets folded in the thread but you can see it you just click on it to unfold it. Imo this is the farrest system without resorting to banning people.

[Sprocket]

@ Sigma:

Quit with the negativity and your rants, your worse than Archer. And get over the physics examples already, i'm really sick of hearing about the 900kg weights, sheesh!!

You posted what I was thinking, almost verbatum!

[Sprocket]

This forum needs a user modding system. Where people can rate a post. If the post is getting a too negative rating it just gets folded in the thread but you can see it you just click on it to unfold it. Imo this is the farrest system without resorting to banning people.

When I first started reading this forum (about 1 year ago) I recall Stephan used to step-in and tell the sceptics to post their opinions in the 'Sceptics thread' - was this idea abandoned?  It certainly used to cut down on a lot of the crap - when the sceptics don't have someone to argue with, they quickly lose intersest and move along...

Archer made a valid point imo (btw, welcome back!) priority should be given to those that actually believe in the FE possibility, not those that, at best, sign up specifically 'cos they get off having an argument, or more ominously, those that are paid to do so!   btw, most scoff at this notion, but there was absolute proof on another forum (ATS) that this does indeed occur - and by NASA no less...

[sigmaX]

I dont get it people

1) I am not negative. I am simply telling that Quinn's examples are (in my opinion / thinking) wrong.

2) Also the 900kgs (and more recently the 5kg in the broomstick) were archer?s words, not mine (and are wrong).

3) Also I don?t think we are here to perform group therapy. Not among us, and specially not for Quinn?s sake. SO I AM NOT giving away my chance to tell what I think, and propose alternatives, even if they are opposed to other people?s thinking.

I believe (I want to believe, as Moulder) in OU  and FE. I bought a bunch of magnets. I have a wood construction set up here in my "lab" and I am trying to do my own investigation. I am ignorant, I have no strong physics basics. Maybe I even am a little NAIVE with it.

I was planning to do a microcontrolled circuit with very low power consumption, that would drive either electromagnets or mechanical gates to allow the repulsion / attraction needs of the wheel system run in the exact moment that it is needed (I think that a magnetic levered wheel could work, but it would be all about timing.

Also by searching in the web, I found SEVERAL other people, even from last century, that already thought and drew schematics around a wheel that has some arms with weights that get dynamically displaced as it turns, by magnetic force, water, etc. SO if this is what archer proposes (I dont even got it that clear by now) it is not his idea at all.

Someone does not like my words ? WHY ? gut feelings at the end of the day only brings mobs and swearwords (one of these phenomena already happening with Quinn saying all kind of bad language, and now seems that attacking me personally (hey if this forum was moderated, the first one to step out would be the bad worded aussie!) ...

Let?s not attack at each other. Lets be respectful, and if someone get the wheel going, place some videos, so all can go party away.

sigmax

[dani1]

Whats about this?
Did we have this already?