Roll on the 20th June

[purepower]

Pure Power - you seem to view this public forum as your own personal pedestal to be used exclusively to maintain your personal vendetta against Archer Quinn. 

So you worked with him in the past - so he dumped you.  Get over it. 

I'm obviously one of the 'anonymous nobodies' you are taking a swipe at.  Save your energy - egotistical rants like your's above just destroys any credibility you may have had.  I happen to have been studying free energy concepts since the late 1980's - and I am a believer.  Just because I haven't posted in this forum before doesn't mean I don't have a great interest and much to offer genuine free energy research.

What are YOU offering genuine free energy research?  The signal-to-noise ratio around here is very bad, because of personal vendettas and spleen venting from people with NOTHING USEFUL TO SAY.

It's unfortunate that Archer is an extremely poor communicator.  But I think he has had some interesting ideas.  Imagine how far he could have got if he didn't have to waste 80% of his energy to respond to personal attacks from @$$#@!#$.

Don't even bother to resond.  I don't care.  Why should you?  Save your energy.  Stick to the technical issues of free energy.

...

Wow dude, wow. You clearly missed the point of every post I have ever had. My involvement here has nothing to do with my past with Archer. When I lost one opportunity to talk to others about FE, I found another. Pure and simple.

I have had many, MANY posts regarding technical information and assistance to others. Ask anyone on this site that has been here for more than 5 pages and they will tell you the same. I havent thrown out any working devices, but no one has.

What have you contributed?

And if you really believe yourself when you say "Stick to the technical issues of free energy," you would never have taken the time to write your last post.

Your entire post was simply to knock me down and make me look like a egotistical oilman. Im sorry, but not today. These are the exact remarks the thread does not need. You proved nothing, you helped nothing. You should be ashamed.

-PurePower

[greendoor]

If you have figured out a way to get the poles to flip with no energy consumption (or less energy than you get back with the rotor turning), then youve done it.

IMO the secret to getting magnetic poles to flip with no energy input is variable reluctance.  Imagine two bar magnets mounted on a board - one with N facing you, the other with S facing you.  Take a piece of steel and mount it on a rotor that moves this steel into the path of the first magnet, and can also rotate to place it into the path of the second magnet.

The steel is equally attracted towards either the N or S pole. And it is also requires equal energy to pull away from either pole.  (Newtonians should be happy so far - if the strength of N and S were different, we would have free energy already).

So the energy required to rotate this wheel, with steel reluctors, is close to zero - just friction. 
So for the price near-zero, we get an altenating magnetic field, to do what we like with.

Don't get distracted with trying to work without SOME energy input.  X/0 = infinity is too hard to obtain.  Don't look for a self rotating wheel yet - look for COP >3.  Heat pumps do 3, and anything too close to 1 is subject to measurement disputes.

I still believe a self rotating wheel is possible - but it requires at least 2 different systems.  Get one system working first.

[Rusty_Springs]

Well, if it works as perfectly as we all hope and you describe it, then nothing.

What you must consider is how you are getting the stator magnets to change poles. In essence, this is how a standard AC motor works. It uses electromagnets as stators to enable the poles to switch, but in that case it consumes electricity.

If you have figured out a way to get the poles to flip with no energy consumption (or less energy than you get back with the rotor turning), then youve done it.

If the poles flip as a mechanical function of the wheel turning, then the chances of it being OU are slim to none. But if you have devised another method that is completely independent, then would you mind sharing so we can develop it further?

Hope this helps...

-PurePower

Hi Power the poles are switch magneticly, I have made 3 magnetic gates, the first I called my corner gate it could have a bar magnet rotor do a full turn but once the opposite pole come into the gate it would bounce back so to get a motor out of that I would have had to turn the gate every half turn and thats not practical.
The second was my trigate it did what I wanted except I was having trouble with the attract in again not practical, then came the third it not only aloud me to attract in and repel out like the other two but it also made it possible with both poles going in the same direction this gave me a way of repeling out and attracting in across an air gap with what ever pole that was comming out, so north would repel out of one end across the air gap and south would repel out of the other end across the other air gap, then when they do the next half turn it would be reversed south would repel where north just did and north would repel where south just did.
All has been tested except for a finished product, the gate theory has been tested and works and its this thoery that can make magnetic motors in all different shapes and sizes just like electricmotors.
Until I have a working model I will not show anyone or tell them the theory people who know me will know I would not release something this big unless I know it works with out any dout.
Take Care Power
Graham

[newbie123]

Where's the working demo video?   Is that all?

Did the oil companies call your bluff?


           

[legendre]

So the energy required to rotate this wheel, with steel reluctors, is close to zero - just friction.

Except that's not true. In addition to friction, eddy currents induced in the moving steel armature will convert rotor KE into heat..

-L