Roll on the 20th June

[purepower]

Oh, and I love how I keep catching nothing but shit and insults from you guys.

No logical explanation, just name calling.

Take your own advice and learn to admit you are wrong before you go make matters worse for yourself.

-PurePower

[shakman]

Oh, and I love how I keep catching nothing but shit and insults from you guys.

No logical explanation, just name calling.

Take your own advice and learn to admit you are wrong before you go make matters worse for yourself.

-PurePower

Okay "genius" please explain why the fuck people bother designing/building/using said devices if the end result is using more energy? [EDIT: With the exception of Rube Goldberg]

You continue to look at the problem through a microscope. As the user of the device I don't give a shit about friction. It is making my job easier. If energy is being expended elsewhere it is of no concern to me.

If you can't see that you are definitely retarded.

[LarryC]

I mocked up Larry's wheel idea in CorelDRAW so as to play around with it. I've attached the result.

It's a great idea, the only thing is that I can't see it generating a hugh amount of torque, but OU is OU and perpetual motion is perpertual motion right? So I'd be happy to see it spin at 1RPM as long as it kept going 

@Archer, what changes were you suggesting? Do you think maybe combining this with the spiralled array?

Hi Shakman,

Interesting Spiral concept!

My drawing was just to get the basic concept across. There could be more arms, longer arms, elliptical fan shape, it would require much testing and tweaking.

I don't think the permalloy will be required, with proper spacing the flux path should stay within each Mayernik track.

The real problem is what Archer said about the wall at a 1:30. In Archer's video I could not see the top of the 45 test and didn't know it wasn't jumping pass.

Helmut pendulum observation is interesting and it may help to get it off the wall.

@Archer,

Can the new rail gun break a 45?

Does the wall increase in strength with the length of the track?


Thanks, Larry

[shakman]

quote author=purepower link=topic=4540.msg112506#msg112506 date=1215957003]
Oh ya, I'm really worried about my job security, luckily I don't have to deal with "pulley batteries."
[/quote]

About that job... I recall someone asked you to prove you actually had the job you say you have (seeing as most of us can't see any company worth a grain of salt would hire such a moron).

I think I have provided more evidence of my ability to hold your supposed job on this page alone. So come on genius, if you don't have any on your PC, you know how to use a scanner right?

I do more troubleshooting in half an hour in my job then you will probably do in a lifetime. I work with Market Data systems and have to ensure they run seemlessly for my bank 24x5. If there is a fault, I have to find it and fix it (or get an external vendor to fix it) fast! Millions of dollars a minute rely on me doing this properly. I have excelled at this to the point I am being sent to the London office to get their team in shape. I can provide proof if you want but seeing as it is no relevence to this topic I don't see the need. I have found many faults in your argument - and the biggest one is that you keep trying to argue a different point to what Exx has challenged you on. Answer his fucking question instead of changing direction so you can pose a question that makes you right. It's like me asking you if 1 + 1 = 2 and you saying "Let's look at it like this, 2 x (4 -1) = 6". It's just fucking stupid champ.

shakman

[exxcomm0n]

I've just jumped back to where I left off and I couldn't believe my eyes...

Dude, I applaud your sense, but let me deal with the PureP thing if/when necessary.

I mean, what content of any real worth do I bring here?

I've let it degenerate me into a snide biscuit (b*tch), but should it really be allowed to sidetrack folks like you bringing real content?

I have (to my satisfaction) defended "my" banked energy concept, and beaten arguments against it into a bloody little depression in the earth.

I'm NOT saying that you should ignore slights made towards you.
But he has seemed to have left it alone for now, and I am more than willing to as well since a thinking person can read the arguments (and there have been a full metric tonne of them) and reach their own conclusions (actually, I thought the Wikipedia article on "tool" was the best outside verification to corroborate my stance yet. "enables the accomplishment of a task not otherwise possible").

He'll learn that a process is a process, and if he has to refer to a process as "gov't cheese", instead of the actual agreed upon and proper physics term to be able to explain it to a customer or manager, it's just a hell of a lot easier and saves boatloads of time.

Ya know, like the following statement example:
"That's it! The "gov't cheese" refines and converts the motive power to achieve the previously impossible end! But a LOT of people refer to that as a tool too."

The idea is important, not the word, the ownership, the origination, or application (mostly).

Lets bank our energy in these new tools.

BTW    Aces on the actual content and drawing you've brought since!

EDIT

Shucks, I seem to have given him too much credit again. But I am finally tiring of the dancing monkey show, and he can jingle his "tin cup" whether I watch him, or not.

So I think I'll stop cranking the hand organ for him.

I think he's finally proved to be so far below my notice (I bet this stirs another tirade).

Hard to believe that I tried to cut the kid a break quite a few times.