Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Roll on the 20th June

Started by CLaNZeR, April 21, 2008, 11:41:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 42 Guests are viewing this topic.

purepower

Quote from: sky on July 29, 2008, 12:46:08 AM
@PP

I don't see where in your qoute of Archer or in anything written by archer him saying

"f(speed) == torque"   

I see you repeatedly saying that he said it, but I cant find a post from him saying it. Even the qoute you say shows him saying it, does not show him saying it. Perhaps you can put that part in red so I can see it more clearly.




Okay, first we see

"speed and rpm never equal torque"

Then in the second quote box of my original post, we see

f(speed) =/= torque

"... because you need to have speed as part of the (torque) equation."

f(speed) == torque

I didn't think I'd have to spell it out like this. Never overestimate your audience, right?

If you still don't understand, try visiting gpage3 to see for yourself.

And arguing this is pointless, aq gave his answer. He says it's a function of time when it's moving.

So I guess he's not a liar, just an idiot...

-PurePower

Edpsx

Quote from: gwhy! on July 29, 2008, 11:18:00 AM

If any of this was directed at me then please let me explain. I came here to learn something and everytime Archer makes a claim of something new It has always been a disappointment ( for me anyway ) . I never said/done anything to provoked Archer. All the questions I asked Archer were genuine and he never answered them ( after all he said he was gonna teach us ) its been more of a dictatorship. At the end of the day Archer Dragged me into bashing session and why? because I said actually IMO Archer your wrong. Wheres the working wheel he promised on the 20th June. Its still no closer to being a runner the last video was a joke to say the least. Archer's the only person that can stop bashing by producing the goods or by not kicking off at anyone that disagrees with him. I sometimes wonder what his REAL motives are behind all this nonsense.

I'm not singling anyone out.  It was just a broad statement for the topic in general.

purepower

Quote from: exxcomm0n on July 29, 2008, 12:39:32 AM
I'll do as I damn well please, monkey boy.

But I ain't grinding an organ for you to dance to anymore.

'Cause it seems you have learned how to with your tail.

Dance monkey, dance. It's quite a good show. ;)

:D

Wow, oh so original and witty!

Yet so petty.

I take the mature position, making a simple statement in hopes of avoiding conflict. But you still comment, and for what cause?

So, who exactly is the "dancing money boy?" The one who tries to avoid conflict, or the one who resorts to grade school name calling?

Interesting....

-PurePower

Edpsx

Quote from: purepower on July 29, 2008, 12:23:33 PM
Wow, oh so original and witty!

Yet so petty.

I take the mature position, making a simple statement in hopes of avoiding conflict. But you still comment, and for what cause?

So, who exactly is the "dancing monkey boy?" The one who tries to avoid conflict, or the one who resorts to grade school name calling?

Interesting....

-PurePower


You do realize your just as bad as he is by responding to his name calling?  Which in turn adds nothing to the conversation.  Your so easily roped into it.

shakman

I hate to interrupt or butt in but...

Quote from: purepower on July 28, 2008, 01:01:57 PM
PS

Two things Id like to see...

First - People stop chasing the impossible "free energy" and focus on the possible and available "free" energy. Just like particles and matter, energy can neither be created not destroyed. A harsh reality, but the sooner you start to play ball with the world around you the sooner you can win the "energy crisis" game.

There are many "free" energy sources out there waiting to be brought to the end-user level. Wind, solar, geothermal, kinetichydroelectric to name a few. There are many upheavles to be overcome to make these our next energy source.

If this had been 130+ pages dedicated to developing an energy system that ran off the temperature difference between your attic and basement, I'm sure we'd have something by now!

Second - a division of this website dedicated to tapping the "free" energy sources

-PurePower

@PP

I thought we were wasting our time chasing the impossible... ???

You are a clever kid, go to a thread where you can provide some useful input and stop "wasting" your time here. Someone has already provided you with a link.

Some of us will continue to "waste" our time on the "impossible" here on this thread regardless of your opinions, and probably continue to make suggestions that go completely against much of what your education has taught you and personal judgement believes.

You've been given a link to a renewables section, your contributions here are becoming a distraction to yourself and others.

I'm not being a bouncer, just making a suggestion. This is not an attack on you, just trying to do as you have suggested - tunnel our energies into areas where they can be best spent.

Regards,

shakman