Roll on the 20th June

[gwhy!]

Gwhy. last response to you having proved by your own posts the truth of the matter, and as i knew and stated you would, claimed the trigate belt as the invention(read like a book), well let me see

1) nothing runs over the belt (he is trying to get the car to drive the road)
And yes i saw the trigates on the board ebing used as a car that were unable to complete the exit, as the power of a trigate cannot carry its own weight through an array or maintain a line as it is not equally held and driven.

2) youre configuration even when running is not a parrallel configuration of poles; it is south to north south and north to south north or simply pointing to the ends of trigates not single poles so as an array it is not the same anyway.

3) your track is complete, its a ring magnet (and your such a genius to have invented that also) so there is no entry or exit point

4) if the claim is simply having aligned magnets all facing the same way, ummm sorry, most smots already do that and so do ummm oh let me see electric motors!!

5) a stick used to throw at an animal is not a spear, as your was not even attempting the same mechanics in a different configuration is is a stick used for the washing claimed as being a spear.

I would say nice try, but at least rustys different array was trying to replicate the mechanical movement outcome, so he was at least throwing his stick at the animal. All that talent wasted on an ideas thief, ya could have been well known and respected for what you can do, but now this will follow you always.

i know, i can hear you crying, ...blue is nearly green blue is nearly green.....

yes blue is nearly green , but there is a reason for why we must know the difference between blue and green.

It is so we know which way is up.

Yes or no Archer thats all I asked. I will ask again Is the magnets on the belt in the video the same configuration as the configuration used for your track , the belt being a loop is not important  at this time: just a simple yes or no.
P.S. I dont think my belt is an invention : it was a way of connecting the mags together... Oh boy . your hard work..

[The Eskimo Quinn]

they may be attracting side by side or mixed, i tired to go off the colors on the end but they appeared to change so i would have to say as they never showed a roller running over them, and when the rollers were sitting on them as extra mags i would definately say no.

you see that shows absolutley the level of you knowledge, the fact that anyone who has built this array knows, if you place without force mags on the outside of the track and they stick (as your did) they are reverse of the poles below, just like they will not sit beside each other.

yet you ran the track like it was the same as before you placed them on as if it would help, the track trying to do one thing and the new bigger magnets trying to do the opposite. No the track can not be seen or known as the same as no demostration showed the same properties with a roller to know it as true. so the answer is no.

the fact you did not even know that placing the large mags on the track by letting them self attach they were opposite to whatever was below them so "could never" have helped showing your true knowledge, and showing that you had no idea how a track worked much less ever built a working loop.

Sorry, the videos, your posts and questions i posted on the page before this over the l;ast 3 weeks shows you did not know what could be done, much less that you were aware of how magnetic arrays worked. I have said sufficient. your posts and videos are your own judge for all the world to see ( http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=4ERUZGk10ns ). I need to and will say no more

[X00013]

Fuck it, here goes nothing, or a little of something, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdBuWR3_F4g

[tekylife]

Fuck it, here goes nothing, or a little of something, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdBuWR3_F4g

It seems to require some effort to switch on and off ...
But Archer demonstrated that already. What we're waiting on is the promised "automatic" version which makes PM possible.
Maybe you have a version of that ready to be shown too. That'd be greater!
Nice!

[Rusty_Springs]

Hi All
First Gwhy are you showing that tank array you did were the array on a convayor belt moves through Trigates, I remember that and it was cool, not only does the array go up and over the hill but it turns as it moves along pulling all the other magnets in the array plus the belt with it, cool mate and I have to say better then anything Archer has shown.

As for magnets first I would still love to see that donut magnet with out a north pole on one side and a south on the other, heres a test people can do to learn about magnets, this also shows my onewaygate and Archers array are the same principle and that principle is basicly you have a stator with a north pole on one side and a south on the other and you have a roller with a north pole on one side and a south on the other, the rollers poles are opposite to the stators poles so they attract into each other pulling the roller in and if you start it far enough back the momentum takes it into the next set of stators that are setup the same way, thats the principle of both devices.
The magnets for the stator can be a bar magnet, cyclinder magnet, block magnet on its side or two block or flat magnets side by side all those magnets give you a north pole on one side and a south on the other.

The magnets for the roller can be cylinder magnets, donut magnets and round magnets those magnets give you a north pole on one side and a south on the other, they also roll making it easier to use, you can use bar or block magnets but you would need steelballs on ever side of them to make them roll.

Now every one of those rollers will attract into and move along any of those stators because the principle is to attract the opposite poles in, you can do tests with any of them to prove this but his a easy test, get a block magnet and any rolling magnet ever a cyclinder magnet, donut or round magnet, turn your block magnet on its side so you have one pole on one side the other on the other side and let your roller go on the top of the block magnet, if the poles are right it will attract in and move along the block magnet if the poles a wrong it will repel so just turn it around so it attracts, you can place something on the top of your block magnet for the roller to roll on and it will work even better or roll better.

Try it then tell me I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure the only people that will say I'm wrong are Archer or his followers anyone that does this test and see's I'm right are all that matters and will know this debate is over about what will and wont work and who came up with this system first.
Take Care All
Graham