Roll on the 20th June

[gwhy!]

they may be attracting side by side or mixed, i tired to go off the colors on the end but they appeared to change so i would have to say as they never showed a roller running over them, and when the rollers were sitting on them as extra mags i would definately say no.

you see that shows absolutley the level of you knowledge, the fact that anyone who has built this array knows, if you place without force mags on the outside of the track and they stick (as your did) they are reverse of the poles below, just like they will not sit beside each other.

yet you ran the track like it was the same as before you placed them on as if it would help, the track trying to do one thing and the new bigger magnets trying to do the opposite. No the track can not be seen or known as the same as no demostration showed the same properties with a roller to know it as true. so the answer is no.

the fact you did not even know that placing the large mags on the track by letting them self attach they were opposite to whatever was below them so "could never" have helped showing your true knowledge, and showing that you had no idea how a track worked much less ever built a working loop.

Sorry, the videos, your posts and questions i posted on the page before this over the l;ast 3 weeks shows you did not know what could be done, much less that you were aware of how magnetic arrays worked. I have said sufficient. your posts and videos are your own judge for all the world to see ( http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=4ERUZGk10ns ). I need to and will say no more

Just a yes or no Archer  . I think you said NO at one point..  All the mags on the belt are pointing the same way all the norths are down one side of the belt and all the souths down the other is this not the same as "YOUR" track ?.


Edit:   Please can anyone confirm the arrangment of  the mags on "ARCHERS" track because I just need to know if its the same configuration as the belt I was using. as I can seem to get a stright answer out of the man himself.

[shakman]

Hi exx,
     have a quick read :     http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20061115072250AAtF9h7

LOL that's actually quite a funny reply GWhy.
But don't forget, WestLife had plenty of success (even if they were crap) so I wouldn't wear it too badly Exx.
I'm off to London soon, I'll have to remember that one in case someone tries to pull that shit on me 

[X00013]

@Teky, I'm workn on that (effort in vs. effort out), hence the pin point archer mentioned, in due time, as I am capable of, I will post, in the mean time, please refer all questions to exx. (lol)

[The Eskimo Quinn]

yes you have a magnet that is the same as one of mine, wow you litle inventor you, oh and you have mags side by side wonderful, just like in a motor, but polarity spacing and having the correct power levels between the track and the driver are what makes a mayernik array, not a rope chain making a ring magnet, that has been around for years in all three forms, not making a ring is formost, in fact surprising rusty did not point that out to you (it was one of his big issues) you two should get together, you could lay magnets out in lots of patterns, and everytime and engineer invents something that has a simialr look, you can claim inventor status coz ladies, that is the only way you will ever achive anything.

and as for rusty, the mag train also has ploes either side of the roller just like yours and just like yours they are at right angles to the roller. so your is exactly the same as the mag train which has been around for a couple of years.

perpendicular field rusty, look it up sometime. that means they are different to parralel, you should look that up also. But only parallel fields will run vertcial over over the loop and yours will not.

as for rusty say it went up and over, the video links shows it did the whole time you pushed it. exceptional. Should i repost your bio for everyone to see who has missed it?

In any event this is my last response to either of you, and with those that read ghys claim of previous loops then see his posts from the last 3 weeks, then backpeddaling down to doesn't it at least look the same, and rusty who simply does not understand anything about magnetic fields, thinking that parallel fields are the same as perpenduicular fields, showing his less than grade 5 knowledge of engineering, and that perpendicular field mag trains have been around for years like the one i have linked on the site, that actually work better than his own.  I am sure many others will join me in not even reading any more of your post and ignoring the fact you are even here.

Same old claims without any proof nothing new here, two new invisible members. I shall add a signiture that has all the invisible members who should be ignored.

[shakman]

Fuck it, here goes nothing, or a little of something, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdBuWR3_F4g

Cool vid, thanks for sharing!