Roll on the 20th June

[gwhy!]

I just watch Archers video, I know According to the quinnster I am a oil baron and nobody should listen to me. But to be honest I think Archers video again dont show the full picture of the problems with this setup. I thought from what people are saying about Archers vid that it would be something breath taking ( How wrong I was ). Take a leaf out of this guys book:

Fuck it, here goes nothing, or a little of something, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdBuWR3_F4g

Much better demo

But again I'm affaid dont show the potential problems with this setup.

Archer just put it on a wheel or what ever system you like and prove all us oil barons wrong I'm big enough and man enough to take the disapointment of being wrong  . Its a shame your not man enough or big enough to admit you are wrong ( yes or no archer  ).

[ezzob]

I don't have any problem to see that the Archurian Gate Key works perfect.

Regards

[shakman]

It appears Bill Nye has infiltrated the thread under many aliases, or inspired a bunch of dimwits to use the same old "my zero proof is still more reliable than your proof because current science tells us so" approach to skepticism. Claiming to stick to the facts whilst blatantly steering away from the current facts by constantly reverting to old quarrels (which have already been covered) is obvious to anyone with an IQ over 120 (which isn't all that high to be honest). The fact that you state irrefutabely that you are not impressed after jumping up and down and saying something can't/won't work, making vague excuses as to why something won't/can't work after clear evidence is given that it can, rearranging your words to suit your arguments post-comment... if you're attempts are aimed at knocking Archer from his podium, it would be better for you to stay silence as you only give me more reason to believe in the man.

@Archer

To be honest, I don't think any of the skeptics are "oilmen" - just sad people looking for attention.

It is my opinion that they are getting a kick out of distracting you and fanning your firey personality. I defend your right to defend yourself (even against me) but you are making great progress so ignore these guys and keep up the great vids, that's the best way for you to respond in my opinion.

@Everyone else

Start playing with this if you have the materials. The more people that prove the viability of this discovery the better. My neos have arrived but I'll need to get some ferrite blocks (and find some time!) to start testing this set up.

shakman

[gwhy!]

I don't have any problem to see that the Archurian Gate Key works perfect.

Regards

If your conviced it works perfect then make a ou device out of it.. pick 1 of 100's of devices than nearlly work and just add the key then you can be the first person to make a device that is OU.. co'z Archer so busy defending "HIS CLAIMS" he hasnt got time to actually produce what he promised he could do over a month ago now. ( yes or no ARCHER.... muppet )

[queue]

A prominent/world.renowned scientist/physicist  wrote to me personally in regards to the Youtube videos i produced about AQ's wheel and what he is attempting to achieve.

Although i cannot reveal his name i wanted to share a portion of what he wrote to me in this forum. Judge for yourself the degree of relevancy. 

Here is an excerpt of what he wrote to me..

=================================
Thanks, "Queue," this is an exceptionally clear demo and discussion.

I think it is summed up in the conservation of energy law that KE + PE = constant, and to the degree that both gravity and magnetism are both considered conservative forces and can therefore be represented as gradients of potentials, we can't get from A to B with losses taken into account. (When Archer discusses PE, he only considers gravitational PE, apparently not realizing that that there is magnetic PE as well.)
=================================