Roll on the 20th June

[exxcomm0n]

Take some time out to caulk the house to get ready for painting and I've got too much material.
It's like magic beanstalk seeds!

As for Ex-Comm, he sure wants us to know that he doesnt care, and that smoking dope is fantastic for him. Personally I think he has an oral fetish, if he had to give his real name or address he would disappear faster than Jim Morrison in Paris. (spare us your stoner retort please).
The old timers on this forum just sit back and laugh, we have seen this a million times.

@ BenWa

Curious about the handle. Could it be because you aspire to things that give women pleasure cause you can't? Or perhaps haven't had the chance to learn how?

Ya know, history is a wonnerful thing, especially when it's to look at the posting history of an "old timer" (from Dec. 2007! You HAVE been here longer than I!), but it's disappointing when again there is not one idea, and proves nothing other than that the poster grooves on belittling others.

Please spare US your vastly superior attitude (it'd have been nice to discover something that could have allowed me to say intellect, but that alas is not the case.) and go back to Lt. Todd somebody and Brittany Spears as you did in the LeeTseung thread.

You should have known not to ask me not to reply. The sad thing is this burnt out stoner can point out that you wear your ass as a hat because I post ideas, even if they are deluded.......

.....and you post content not even worthy of a Fox TV sitcom.

Oh, but please keep coming back as I need entertainment as much as the next guy, just don't do it during "Family Guy".



@ Bobbo & JohnGalt

You want to see Archer answer a few questions.

I want to see your contributions to an idea here, or a device your made, or an idea for SOMETHING.

The more time wears on, the more I find myself inclined to ask the same questions you ask, but I have learned a few things here and seen a few more, so I bide my time.

Guy's, please prove yourselves to be more then Ben Wa turned out to be worth.

@ yo-yo

You think he couldn't make an electromag?

I've seen videos of him building and I think he can twist wire around a nail and then connect it to a battery.

The question is, can you?

@ Absolute

I warned you there were no clear and concise instructions yet man.

I finally started saving the web pages, stripping off the html and php content and then joining them all together as one long document for history searching purposes.
It took a little time, but it was worth it.

Is it worth it to you?

@ kude

I dunno if you can say that the original idea is/was a failure. Certainly got a bunch of people het up about it, hasn't it?

Hell, I'll mock up a plan of the "original device" if everyone's so into it (I'd rather think how ideas presented in this thread could be smooshed together to make a working something), but there are no guarantees as to it really being anytihng like the still mythical 1st (which shall remain mythical if'n it was destroyed).

So......to yet again prove the herbally challenged can bring more to the table than talk, I have rebuilt the Dirt Devil and ran a few more tests (editting into a video series as I type).

Badly lit, contextually depraved, full of multiple personality proofs here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StsLxsLPpPg

Anyone else ready to exhibit proof of ability or exploration of concept?



(Since it's getting so much "air" recently....)

Ron Paul for President
(this may be our last chance!)

[Bobbotov]

@ Bobbo & JohnGalt

You want to see Archer answer a few questions.

I want to see your contributions to an idea here, or a device your made, or an idea for SOMETHING.

The more time wears on, the more I find myself inclined to ask the same questions you ask, but I have learned a few things here and seen a few more, so I bide my time.

Guy's, please prove yourselves to be more then Ben Wa turned out to be worth.

But I am not making fabulous OU claims and like I said I think the possibility of OU if any lies at the quantum level to which experimentation by any of us is not feasible.  I might as well look for the Higgs Boson with refrigerator magnets or build a super-luminal spacecraft from lawnmower parts.

[exxcomm0n]

But I am not making fabulous OU claims and like I said I think the possibility of OU if any lies at the quantum level to which experimentation by any of us is not feasible.  I might as well look for the Higgs Boson with refrigerator magnets or build a super-luminal spacecraft from lawnmower parts.

@ Bobbo

But you are hanging in a place that has VERY little ability to fulfill OU in the manner you believe (Not may here with the multi-millions probably needed to explore quantum mechanics),

so why are you here?

EDIT

Anything on that contribution or content angle I asked for earlier?

Just curious.

[kude]

@ kude

I dunno if you can say that the original idea is/was a failure. Certainly got a bunch of people het up about it, hasn't it?

Hell, I'll mock up a plan of the "original device" if everyone's so into it (I'd rather think how ideas presented in this thread could be smooshed together to make a working something), but there are no guarantees as to it really being anytihng like the still mythical 1st (which shall remain mythical if'n it was destroyed).

I am trying to use words carefully. I jsut think the original concept hasn't been shown in a way that peers would accept as a working device.

I agree he has drawn in a crowd, and attracted a lot of attention. But unless something is clearly shown to work, that crowd grows fickle as you can see. Right now they want a working device or a hanging.

People are still sulking about the original promises when it is clear to me things have moved on to something else. It's going to remain ugly in here until something is shown to work.

AQ is not the kind of guy to say, look fellas I thought I had a device that worked, but I can't get it to do what I want now, so I apologize. To make up for it, I'll keep working at something with some of your suggestions.

He didn't say that, but then  he came up with a new concept or two, Mayernick and gate Key. I say there's nothing to lose, at this point, seeing where that goes.

[Bobbotov]

@ Bobbo

But you are hanging in a place that has VERY little ability to fulfill OU in the manner you believe (Not may here with the multi-millions probably needed to explore quantum mechanics),

so why are you here?

EDIT

Anything on that contribution or content angle I asked for earlier?

Just curious.

I have followed FE/OU/PM for a couple of years and it is an odd fascination that is akin to watching a building either under construction or being demolished even though I am neither in the construction or demolition business.
The point really is, why is Archer here? I mean he hasn't done OU either and I doubt he has the remotest chance at this point.