Roll on the 20th June

[OU-812]

He can't. When you're 21 and have a big mouth and a bigger ego, you won't know where to stop!

cheers
chrisC

Based on the context of the post (within the Archer Quinn thread), that statement about PP is irony at its best....

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I hope you enjoy what is the holy grail of this type of device, and now feel comfortable that the wheel is in the very best of hands in the known field of research and construction of devices capable of producing continuous motion from magnetic fields that require the defeating of gravity itself and providing extra work.

I don?t need blind faith in me, I have produced replicated results. As for what you have seen so far?

I?ll say it again.

Baby you aint seen nothing yet

None of today?s scientist and engineer may have been able to build a pyramid, but I could, and without 200 thousand slaves in a lesser timeframe that is quoted.

I would be interested to know from what perspective giving away trillions of dollars in technology without patent for free is some form of scam?

(wow, $trillions)

A scientist??? wow i am impressed, so if your logic is science logic you can keep it, you just said if i don't understand it, that makes it correct?

I don't understand the theory that i am stealing gravity from the earth and it may make the planet unstable, that does not make it correct.

Just for the record, i was so pissed at all of the bullshit, i reproduced the egyptian fulcrum this afternoon, and got one to one on the roughest machine i have ever built.

but that's also impossible right??, because one to one with coils on the sides of the fulcrum and a north south magnetic plate beside it would have produced free energy correct.

one to one means the light weight that was used to raise the heavy weight on the offset fulcrum was, raise at the heavy end when the heavy weight fell. So much for newtonian physics.

In fact this will now be my primary machine as it just worked, so i will be building this on a huge scale before the date even if i have to sell my car and quit my job to do it.

you know why you drop kick? because the weight it lifted was dragged over a rod by a string, no pulley at all, that's how much friction there was and it still worked.

Now would be a great time gentlemen to collect all the names of the clever "scientists" who i am not out to ridicule, i am out to show them to the world as the primary reason our planet came under the control of the oil barons. Ther should be a list of those who spread flase physics.

You stick with your math champ, and i'll stick with the real world.

Lets me see, the first person in 12000 years to come up with a genuine reproducable way to move the stones of the great pyramids without hundreds of thousands of people, and you are smarter than i ??

History has already judged that answer the day i published it, and there was no perpetual motion there, but i never saw any newtonians throughout history even have a clue??

No i don't understand newton theory, i never understood bullshit stories.

Yeah i worked out nuclear physics problems with polonium in the space shuttle, research links between physics and DNA structure...

[g4macdad]

Based on the context of the post (within the Archer Quinn thread), that statement about PP is irony at its best....

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  (wow, $trillions)

But this is HIS thread! Where is yours and PP's? As soon as you start it you know people will flock, since you are obviously geniuses. LOL

[wizardofmars]

Most of us will never forget him...He has affected us all in some way...Sometime in the Future there may be a giant Statue errected to his memory...Archer is Helping us all in his way not only with Building a device for our childrens futures...But building a better mindset for us all ...Remember this none of us would be here but for this thread started by Clanzer introduceing us to  Archer Quinn....Thanks Archer Quinn

Amen brother! All hail the mighty Archer Quinn, creator of pointless videos and poster of wild statements. 

[EvilToeKnee]

As many of you know I haven't been here in a LOOONG time.  I see everything is the same.  I'm telling you all, this is the best Soap Opera of all time.  I have to comment on Archer's original design.  Even on a toy scale as he had commented.  I would love to have the blueprints for it.  And no, EX, I'm not looking for a "cookie" cutter.  I want a better understanding.

Evil Toe Knee

[capthook]

Hey Archer - why did you delete your comments about the hoax utube device? The ones
quoted by Rasta? Guess you were embarrassed to have been fooled by something claimed to
be true that wasn't.  How's it feel?  Like alot of folks on this thread sometimes feel?
Guess you noticed how it was my analysis that exposed that hoax as well eh?
Just like my analysis of some of your past BS was exposed as BS.

Still glad you're trying and showing.
2 thumbs up for that.
But the BS still flows and the results are...well.... unimpressive thus far.
But keep at it - maybe some day you or someone here will crack it.

The explanations of your first device was full of holes as well.
The points made about your electromagnets and their efficiency were good ones.

Having constructed and tested dozens of electromagnet designs as well as over 30 designs of generator coils
I can say what has been proposed here is - thus far - impossible.  I believe it COULD be solved - but is not a skip through the park.
The energy needed for the electromagnet has always been more than can be collected.  Lenz Law is the primary impediment - among others.

As to generation - I proposed months ago that custom made coils would be needed rather than a modified production generator.
You will need custom coils designed around the weight transfer/rpm's of the device.
Generator coils and electromagnet coils are opposite sides of a coin yet have much in common.  Much of what makes a good electromagnet makes
a good generator coil.

Having tried for years to combine the 2 into an OU device - what is talked about here in simple ways and proposed as a simple process is in no way that.
And Archer's self-proclaimed lack of this type of knowledge is further indication of past and future folley.

If you're interested in designing coils - numerous complicated equations can help narrow the parameters.
Or you could wind a bunch trying this and that and see what happens.  But to start with the formulas to get the starting point would be advised.
Winding coils is both science and art - knowing the variables and how to apply them.

An awesome online/java coil simulator can do the math for you after plugging in the numbers.

http://www.coilgun.info/mark2/inductorsim.htm

Highly recommended for anyone wishing to learn/test/examine coil construction.


........back to the beach cya