Roll on the 20th June

[The Eskimo Quinn]

gee let me see really tough one, there is power running to the electromagnet continuously from the turning wheel, the reader is connected to the electromagnet to turn it on, the power to the reader is already there from the wheel and it uses about as much as an led light, so unless the hundreds of kilos of falling weight on large machines wont power an led you have bigger problems than that, that means all those hydro dams are only powering a few toasters.

clearly you have no knowledge on the subject. second of all the wheel is turning the power is massive and already flowing to the reader that use not much more than static.

Don't embarrass yourself, if you think a even a friction mica switch can use up the power of even a 2 ounce rod, you are an idiot.

in fact lets end this idiot conversation once and for all, lets go back to the cave man days.

know what a spark plug is clown? know what a communtator is clown? know anything about electron flow clown? know that the electricity from the generator will jump across the communtator by spark clown?

any friction in spark clown? Know why we don?t use them anymore? because they are "less" energy effecient than signal readers.

piss off an leave the inventing to those of us who have a vast range of knowledge across all fields.

[OU-812]

....
So if we already have all the parts, we know each of them does what is required, what does Occam's razor tell you.
....

You all saw what happend at each stage, you all saw that the claims were always the next satge could not be built, or what i had show could not be reproduced. So you see in real terms what would have happened to a vidoe of a working wheel, simply rebuilt in a manner that would not work, just as you have seen people do this with the stages. yet when others finally built, and the outcome was beyond question, we moved on.

Do you think they will stop it now? the roads are now splitting, with hundreds of combinations, each and every component known and built by others as working.

Give the man a fish and he has food for a day.

OMG You are brilliant, I see it now so clearly.  The haze has lifted!!

Check it out:

Stage 1)  Take a non-magnetic loop (similar to a bike wheel but out of something like plexiglass)
Stage 2)  Attach a magnet to the outside of the rim such that N pole faces down on the right side (downward spin direction))and N pole faces up on the left side (upward spin direction).
Stage 3)  Position magnet at 1:00 and let go, should spin down and round to about 8:00. Still with me?
Stage 4)  Hold another magnet in your hand such that S pole faced upward
Stage 5)  Repeat Stage 3 but this time as magnet on wheel approaches 8:00 (or as far as it can get) use your hand to move the magnet from Stage 4 close to S pole on wheel (facing down).  THis puts the two S poles in proximity and they will repel each other
Stage 6)  As repulsion moves wheel and magnet up (from 8:00 to 9:00 to 10:00 etc) move your hand with magnet until magnet on wheel reaches 1:00
Stage 7)  Repeat

What do you know. BAM!  OU!!

You see, the hand doesn't provide any extra energy we are just manipulating the energy that is already there in the magnets!!

Brillian logic AQ!  Fuck Newton.

[JohnGalt_USA]

You have seen more on this thread in new manipulation of magnetic energy than all the combined threads of all the sites of the entire world.

Has anyone seen one new magnetic manipulation on any other thread or site? I imagine there must be at least one. But certainly not the likes of loops, mayerniks, gate keys, chain reactions.

This thread "is" the world leader in this technology, and no one can say otherwise because they would have to prove it and could not.

The skeptics should think about that for a moment, all this new technology by luck or chance?

There may be maddness to my method, but no one can deny that it is working.

Not so fast there Archer...I can deny that it is working!

Archer, there is so much crap in this thread that I must have missed the video where you closed the loop and got your new perpetual motion machine working. Before I send you my check, can you please provide a link to the video that shows your perpetual motion machine running and also the plans to replicate it?

[exxcomm0n]

@exx
Look wind bag, if you have not realized yet it is you that we are all tired of hearing from. Your builds are no more significant than Archer's and they only show the world what a fool you really are. Like your repeated posts your builds have accomplish nothing! Perhaps that's why you continue to defend Archer, you're so much alike.

But they ARE more significant than yours, and perhaps that why you're such a blow hard?
You don't like 'em, don't watch.

You don't see failure as being an important part of success, perhaps it's because you are too scared to try for fear of failure.
Most great men FAIL A LOT, but you don't hear about that much as they kept trying and the result far outweighed any failure.

Come in with something of your own that you've done, and maybe I'll consider listening to you, or your appraisal.

Maybe then I'll believe in you "all".



I see your questions have been answered.

Now can we hear about a non-fictional static motor you've got? Or any experimentation towards that goal?

[capthook]

gee let me see really tough one, there is power running to the electromagnet conitously from the truning wheel, the reader is connected to the electromagnet to turn it on, the power to the reader is already there from the wheel and it uses about as much as an led light, so unless the hundered s of kilos of falling weight on large machines wont power an led you have bigger probelms than that, that means all those hydro dams are only powering a few toasters.

clearl;y you have no knowledge on the subject. second oif the wheel is truning the power is massive and already flowing to the reader that use not much more than static.

Don't embarres yourself, if you think a even a friction mica switch can use up the power of even a 2 ounce rod, you are an idiot.

What is embarrassing is your writing/communication skills.

So - you claim:
"there is power running to the electromagnet conitously from the truning wheel"

You have been making this claim for many months now - yet have shown only failed attempts.
You even admitted to knowing nothing about electromagnets.  And now you want us to believe you are an expert?

"second oif the wheel is truning the power is massive and already flowing to the reader that use not much more than static."

Now your device is not just OU, but is producing 'massive' power.  Your crazy claims have just been bumped up a notch even further.  It's not OU - but outputting massive power.

Is this the device you showed in your video making a few wobbles?
Or the fulcrum?
Or the M array?
Or some other device using the gate key?
LOL