Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?

[BEP]

Look Mom!

The good doctor finally realized you can excite and improve very low level systems with a bit of Brownian noise. (Stochastic resonance to some). He gave his own name for it but he deserves that - he obviously worked hard for it.

This is one I haven't proven/disproven to myself. Apply Brownian noise with bandspread from 35kHz to 245kHz to raise the natural noise floor to a useable level and the result be DC with a bit of hash on it. I need to build the correct noise filter for my noise generator to do it.

Nice to hear from you EM! Nevada Huh?     

@Sparks,

Watch it with flat coils. Put one between two solenoid coils - each of those opposite handedness. Wadda ya get? What most folks call a Tesla coil but the primary flat coil is in the middle between the opposing secondaries. hint: Telsa coil sitting upon a mirror with reflection showing
I think this is where the coil bangs the coil banger 

[otto]

Hello all,

@AM

as you see I have no partner here to discuss cores.

@wattsup

you are clever. What do you think why didnt SM patent the coils but everything around his coils like the control of this device??

Otto

[innovation_station]

@ otto i have not figured out why you are not useing your collector as your core

to make use of your lil test

as i see it this should be your output if we are useing polarized electro mags then this becomes a pump

im useing bifillar coils so i can harness the kick but i also am useing the bedini curcuit with my mods to it

if i were to use fets i need only a single coil because the fet will dump the kick to the next load

i have 2 tpu's im currently building

yes they are like marco's

i will post pics soon

i have .5 of a coil left to wind then i will take a pic...

ist

[sparks]

       Spherics states that SM discovered an anamolous spike on some bifilar wire.
He just rediscovered Tesla's coil cap.  This device converts the coil bang into a real slow mover.  Basically using the voltage of the emwave to lock the electron field in the  mass into warped orbitals causing each atom to become a self charged capacitor in response to the emwave catalyst.  This warping of the orbitals is selfpowered.  The wave doens't give a shit which way the electron field is circulating.  It's not in the same intertial frame as the electrons.  But the charge of the electron is.  So it swings it's electric dipole moments into alignment with the emwave charge seperaton.  This results in a disresonance of the atomic structure that can cause valence electrons on the surface of the mass to propel themselves,  beyond the influence of the neuclei.  This propulsion is coming from the potential energy stored in the electron orbital and spin momentum.  Ever touch a spinning top just right and have it take off like a bat out of hell?  All mass is is a bunch and I mean a bunch of standing waves.  So you can also think of the electron as an emwave donor to the system emwave density.  A very small conversion of mass to energy but if done right, and we recycle the catalyst wave, energy starts to build up in the system real fast. 
      The problem is that this has been known for many years.  When the hell is the technology going to start getting out of the Miltary field and into the grid?

[wattsup]

@otto

Well, I think this is not a fair question to ask since I have never seen any patents issued to a Steven Mark that can be directly identified to the maker of the TPU. I have searched for a very long time, like everyone else I am sure. Please explain what you really mean or what makes you think there are patents on other parts of the TPU.

But regardless of my gut feeling that there are no patents, I went back on Freepatentsonline.com and made an advanced search as follows;

IN/"STEVEN MARK"
APD/1/1/1995->10/26/2008

This means search for all patents with Inventor Name "Steven Mark" between January 1st, 1995 and October 26th, 2008. There were 163 results but none come close to anything in the realm of circuit control for a TPU. Most are related to computer bus systems.

So my quick answer to your question is "no I am not that clever to be able to know anything about SMs patents, be it for the coils or for any peripheral control circuit or other components". I do not know anyone who does and have never seen or know of such patents. Granted, if anyone knows about these patents, please advise us all.