Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?

[wattsup]

Well it could be a diode, but diodes could easilly be placed in the black box.

Question: Could the resistor on the cap be required to keep the output alive while it is not connected to a real load? I have notice that as voltage rises from a secondary into a cap tank, the coupling effect decrease inside a transformer. When you release the cap energy, the coupling effect return inside the transformer to it's maximum.

Here are some other observations on the LPTU;

1) The two toroids, if they are bucking, supply one impulse per toroid. 2 wires per toroid.
2) If you put a reed switch inside the center of the toroid and fill it with epoxy. 2 more wires per toroid. That's four wires from each of the toroids, two white and two black.

We know that in the LPTU, the four wires are coming out 2 by 2. One black to one white. Other black to other white. Why would you put the two in parallel. Because one feeds the coil and the other connects the circuit to short out the  impulse. This will make an oscillating bucking field. The magnet start is required to short out the first reed to get the first system going. He then brought the magnet to the other toroid to get the other reed started.

The toroid pulses with two wires. When it is pulsed it's field closes the reed that shorts the toroid, setting the supply voltage to zero, resetting the drive. All you have to do is provide a steady dc to this and it will pulse.

Here is some proof I did a few days ago but my video camera is broken so I did not do a video. I will do one when I get a new video camera. But here is a picture of what I used.

If you refer to the Tesla Project thread here;
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=3972.msg84982#msg84982

OK I took two microwave transformers and took off the top armatures and this makes a good strong electromagnet. I then took two 3-way reed contacts, the type you use for doors and windows for home alarm systems. I connected them as per the diagram, without the need to use the lower magnets and put only 12 volts dc through the system. Placing the contacts at the approximate position as shown in the photo, the contacts started oscillating continuously. Only required to provide a steady dc voltage. I only used the primaries for this experiment.

Now I am thinking this three way thing can also be done with a two way reed switch if just used in parallel with a transformer to simply short to the bucking coil. Voltage on this does not have to be high. The bucking coil is not wasting anything. It puts energy into the core and also activates the reed. The reed shorts the coil, that implodes the field and some of (or all off depending on the timing) the energy inside the core, back into the feed source as flyback. This makes oscillating shorts, just the way Tesla likes it.

This may or may not be a direct relation to the TPUs. But one thing for sure is in any of these systems, you require a method for pulsing, to create a short, this short can return flyback and/or, even reverse polarity over a coiling system. There are not 1000s of ways to do this and the choice of components is very limited.

What @armagdn03 has shown is that with any coil/cap combo, if you reach a state of resonance, you not only increase the speed of energy exchange but you also increase the field density of a given coiling system. This simple increase in density for let's say the FTPU could be enough to generate and increase the coupling effect between the outer coils and the inner ring.

The electronic circuit (transistor, diode, etc.) let's say on the FTPU. Again, if you have a reed switch inside the toroid, your pulsing mechanism is ready to go. It is simple and in many cases, if the maximum applied voltage to the bucking coil is just right, the reed will last a long time indeed. Since the pulsing is taken care of, all you need is a transistor to sense the flyback and switch it over to a dioded output capacitor.

[turbo]

Yeah,but tell me how that will explode my house?  You just talking, but not answering my question.

House exploding is totally bullshit! Of course, you can die, or hurt yourself serious,but you will not make dust from your house in a microsecond. It will not happen!

Maybe this picture answers your question....

You should concider the copper isn't responisible for the explosion, but the reaction is.

The explosion is powered by the source we are tapping into, and this source can and will destroy you and your house in a microsecond in case of malfunctioning controlling circuits, it is extremly powerfull.

[sparks]

  @wattsup

       I wonder what the magnetic response of a metal oxide semiconductor is.
Maybe he is burying a mosfet in the epoxy instead of a reed switch.   Interesting concept putting the sparker inside a coil.  Tesla found that the physical orientation of the spark gap to his coils would make a whole bunch of difference.

[wattsup]

@sparks

Yes that could be a mosfet but that requires three connections maybe one shared by the mosfet and the bucking coil.

Not only that, by putting the reed inside the toroid, you would also take advantage of the quenching effect of the toroid center and this helps maintain or preserve the life of the reed.

I have done many tests burning up over 25 reeds but within a field, the reed is still working. A magnet directly next to the reed makes the best action but will burn it up in no time, but near a field it lasts.

Plus as a bonus on today's special, you also get the "vibration" effect in the device itself at no charge.lol

[innovation_station]

  @wattsup

       I wonder what the magnetic response of a metal oxide semiconductor is.
Maybe he is burying a mosfet in the epoxy instead of a reed switch.   Interesting concept putting the sparker inside a coil.  Tesla found that the physical orientation of the spark gap to his coils would make a whole bunch of difference.

i have made claims of this in the past and done a bunch of expairments regarding exactly what you say sparks

yes the proper angle makes one HECK OF A DIFFRENCE

my cap charger i made long ago works like this  and if you zap neos...  you will have a much larger plasma flame or rf flame or radient engery ball

when your spark is at the correct angle to the neo

WARNING ....   when doing this i beleave there is a RADITION  HAZZARD !!!!!!  SO BE WISE

i have personally felt burning on my skin...   and it seams similar to welders flash but on your skin !!!!!

i used 12vdc 1 amp and  hand pluses amoung many things   i will warn you DO NOT TOUCH THE MAGNET  you will feel it !!!!!

i have done many expairments such as this and i have vids here showing my spikes on my scope.... 

also it gets better....   

when i use this as my osc and put the output to a mot 

now u see tha light stand up 4 ur rite

ist