Lutec PR Executive Statement

[ourbobby]

Hi guys,
          check this out before you commit to the Lutec Flux density!

       http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/comment/lutec.htm

Regards

[hartiberlin]

Ian Bryce had no real knowledge of the Lutec system,
when he measured it.

It was long ago already discussed over here.
He made several measurement errors and did not account in
the RF power bursts that are the main OU power of this system.

The Lutec wheel is more or less only a flywheel to keep the system spinning
and generate the power via the sparking commutator and charge this way up the
batteries, so there is not much mechanical power in this system
and only this was measured by Ian Bryce...
So he did only measure one small component of the output power,
but neglected the real big RF pulses...that make the system work....


Why don?t you visit Lutec and have yourself a look at it ?

[ourbobby]

Why don?t you visit Lutec and have yourself a look at it ?

I have. I might be new to the discussions on this forum, but, that does not preclude me from noting the manner with which these guys respond to information requests.  Also, the link does supply valid concerns. IMHO, you have quite rightly expressed some support for the LUTEC system. I have my reservations.

I am mindful of all the claims made with "Large" overunity claims - not that I do not wish to believe them, indeed, I am still naive enough to think that some of the promises made are achievable. Claims contested  such as with the Perendev Motor:-
http://www.freeenergynews.com/Directory/Perendev/MagneticMotor/KeithAnderson_statement/index.html

Indeed, as a starting point, one of the whole issues with magnetic motor energy, IMHO, is related to demagnetisation due to constant repulsion.

I thankyou for your reply and regards to you

[hartiberlin]

Hi,
Keith Anderson never came forward with any pictures of proof,
that he really has tested any magnetic motor.

I also believe, that the Perendev motor video was a scam.

Perendev never showed the wholemotor from all sides
and the replications so far from all the people who tried
them failed..
That surely does not work, just magnets versus magnets.
You need a lot of iron between them as a buffer metal and shielding

Look at the Helmut Goebkes magnet motor concept,
or the Tomi magnet track with 90 degrees iron core pieces I presented on youtube.

www.youtube.com/user/overunitydotcom

[Sprocket]

.....Indeed, as a starting point, one of the whole issues with magnetic motor energy, IMHO, is related to demagnetisation due to constant repulsion.

I thankyou for your reply and regards to you

Is this not another of those "urban legends" - I recall reading ages ago on this forum that one well-respected member had been testing this conjecture for more than 6 months (at least twice that now, if he continued the testing) and had found no deterioration whatsoever in field strength.  Moreover, during my own meagre research (ages ago) I found that in order to permanently demagnetise a neo magnet, a magnetic field strength - called the 'intrinsic coercive field' (iHc) - must be reached.  This is far higher than the 'normal' coercive field (Hc) - the field strength needed to just nullify a magnets field strength.  Therefore, if similar sized magnets are used in a system, no degradation of field strength should occur - at least in my mind!  And until such time as I find a reliable source that suggests otherwise, I will continue to believe it is just more dis-information - "Mythbusters"  are obviously excluded!