The Moon-landings - NASA's Hoaxes & Lies (new video evidence)

[gravityblock]

You are either being led astray by deluded or crazy people or by people that are taking advantage of the whole hypothesis for profit.  Either way you are being played like a fiddle.

I watched the whole thing as a kid from Apollo 8 onwards.  I have been to Cape Canaveral.  The physics makes sense.  The engineering is doable.  There was a Cold War.

The truth is out there...

You've been bamboozled and hoodwinked!


Gravock

[gravityblock]

The "transparency" referred to is due to the characteristics of the primitive vidicon tube used in early video cameras. It was 1969, ffs, and the vidicon "blooms" which means that it makes an afterimage of bright features that persists and can appear "through" the dimmer features of an object imaged later--- as is clearly evident in the footage shown.

Apollo 11's TV Camera - the FIBER OPTIC LIE!  ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=eGP0vgQBqUs#t=63s )

Like I said, I have tried to come up with another explanation for the "transparency" effect, and what I have found is one lie leads to a greater lie.

Gravock

[MileHigh]

Connecting the dots with a thin gossamer thread happens all the time.  Is there any connection between the blue screening and the fiber optic camera or did you just make the connection here?

I can't rebut the "undeclared fiber-optics technology," that's a new one to me.  Now one possibility is that the document was written by an over zealous 22-year-old.  Tens if not hundreds of thousands of people worked on the project.  Did you ever have a friend when you were growing up where he was always referring to his pet projects as a "big secret?"

Notice also that you have no response to the issue of the way the vidicon tube has the property of image persistence.  I noticed that for many years all over the place when those video cameras were used back in the day.  It was very obvious if you paid moderate attention to the image detail in the live video frame.

[gravityblock]

Connecting the dots with a thin gossamer thread happens all the time.  Is there any connection between the blue screening and the fiber optic camera or did you just make the connection here?

I can't rebut the "undeclared fiber-optics technology," that's a new one to me.  Now one possibility is that the document was written by an over zealous 22-year-old.  Tens if not hundreds of thousands of people worked on the project.  Did you ever have a friend when you were growing up where he was always referring to his pet projects as a "big secret?"

Notice also that you have no response to the issue of the way the vidicon tube has the property of image persistence.  I noticed that for many years all over the place when those video cameras were used back in the day.  It was very obvious if you paid moderate attention to the image detail in the live video frame.

Apparently my challenge to you in taking a deep hard look at how Stanley Kubrick faked the moon landings wasn't taken seriously.  Here's the link again, http://www.realitysandwich.com/kubrick_apollo

Gravock

[TechStuf]

"And further it is an insult to all scientists everywhere to claim that the moon landings did not occur  as described by NASA.... and exactly as shown, live, and watched by some of us at the time."

Spoken like a truly blinded acolyte.  "insult to all scientists everywhere"...blah blah blah.... NOPE....just the devious ones tk.  ...Educate thy self.....

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106637066

http://rense.com/general86/moreap.htm

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/47john_lear/02files/Lunar_Orbiter_Tapes_Found.html

Clearly NASA feels an abandoned Micky Dees is the way "all scientists everywhere" should honor "Space Pioneer History".  Surely, they weren't trying to hide aging evidence of yet another 'cover up'.  Oops, some new guy we hired from a temp agency accidently taped over the original moon footage. Umm, we are very upset about this!  So upset that we've moved them to an abandoned McDonald's restaurant for re-evaluation and restoration.  We got the idea from the movie: Spies Like Us!  Brilliant!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gK5tWGKHdA4

NASA went to the moon alright.  Of that I have NO DOUBT....though it has proven a cold, vacuous, and shrivelling place to get caught with their pants down.

"As described by NASA"  he says. 

NASA didn't get the widely accepted acronym: Never A Straight Answer for Nothing....

The road to HELL is paved with good intentions, they say.  And NASA has done a lot of paving for the beast in our neck of the solar systemic 'woods'.


Blessings


TS