The Moon-landings - NASA's Hoaxes & Lies (new video evidence)

[TinselKoala]

Document 28-105 discloses the use of a classified and confidential fiber optics inside the camera case:  http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/MSC-SESD-28-105.pdf

Now, if the camera used classified and confidential fiber optics as stated in the above document, which NASA refuses to comment on, then the argument for a camera using a primitive vidicon tube holds no weight and can offer no explanation to the "transparency" effect.  The "transparency" effect was due to the front projection and a blue screen when the angle and lighting wasn't perfect, as used by Stanley Kubrick.

Gravock

Nope. Your logic is faulty. You don't know what the fiber optics were for, and I'll bet you don't have much experience with high-contrast photography using vidicons or CCDs. But I have.

[TinselKoala]

NASA as a whole is fake. It is mainly a disinformation agency run by the Bilderbergs and Illuminati to cover the Obama dictatorship. They had CCD cameras back then, but faked the video artifacts to make it look like a fake videcon effect caused by blue-boxing.


Just study it out, it's all over YouTube.

You are really funny.

[gravityblock]

You are making yourself look like a gullible, paranoid idiot. Thousands of people worked on Apollo and other NASA successes, and some of them died doing it. The "evidence" that is cited for claims of fakery is insignificant compared to the mountains of evidence that the landings were real, and you are either "taking the piss" as they say in the UK or you are genuinely nutso.

I watched it live on TV, along with the Vietnam War and the Watts riots. My father's family lived in Houston and we knew people who worked at NASA at the time of the Apollo program.

I suppose you will say next that those were faked too.

The above isn't a scientific argument for your primitive vidicon tube transparency effect.  You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.  Some things are just not what they appear to be.  You should know this!  You are the gullible one.

According to your swallow thinking, Nasa has this advanced technology to send a man to the moon while using a primitive vidicon tube in its cameras for a live broadcast event, lol.  I guess if they said it was broadcasted live, then it must have been, lol. Can you say gullible?  In addition to this, the people working for NASA is nothing more than part of a coverup for the real space program.  Give me a break, let go of your pride, and get real with yourself!

Gravock

[gravityblock]

Nope. Your logic is faulty. You don't know what the fiber optics were for, and I'll bet you don't have much experience with high-contrast photography using vidicons or CCDs. But I have.

Not a scientific argument either.  You're grasping for straws.  Maybe you should have another look at document 28-105 again.  It talks about projections.  What were they planning to project?  A staged event of course, which is inline with them using a front projection and a blue screen to fake the moon landings.

Gravock

[onthecuttingedge2005]

anyone with enough money and resources can make it to the moon, it's like making it to Canada on a bet. hell give me a billion dollars and I'll get you to the moon to see for yourself.

don't even pull the van Allen belts radiation on me because I already have the radiation figures calculated years ago on this site.

jerry