I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device

[dieter]

Basicly Smith says, you can clone the receiver of wireless energy transmission without to draw more energy from the transmitter. Hi Voltage and Hi Frequency is required. Resonance prevents usual RF losses. Basicly you need a couple of identical tesla coils, one is the transmitter, surrounded by a ring of receivers. Sounds easy to me.


Speaking of sparks, there may be more things going on than mainstream theories say about it. For example the back emf has a higher voltage and so a sparkgap may show two sparks simultanously, the red one (fwd) and the blue (back emf spark), visually mixing to a violet color. However, you can block the back emf with diodes. But what is really interesting about it is his pulling force... imagine the sticky electrons at the other end of the circuit, when the back emf hits, then they will be stressed enormously. Plausible is, that you can pull electrons from the ground this way. All I know is, when I tried that with my 3V mosquito zapper sparkgap and ground, it destroyed my digital voltmeter after it showed some insane ampere readings...

[Farmhand]

All the attempts to replicate that claimed effect by Don Smith indicate that the input to the transmitter always exceeds the output of all receivers. Several were done and shown the the Don Smith thread on the EF forum. As far as I know all of the attempts showed the available output was shared between the receivers and was less in total than the input to the transmitter. I fail to see how such a setup could show more EDIT: "Energy" received than is transmitted.

The only thing Don showed was that multiple receivers could output the same power as one receiver, no input power (real power) was stated. Nor was the output power, he just showed it lighting NE 2 neons.

If you have the time you can watch this video belowhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJd8TNC75AI of two receivers with outputs and one transmitter using a small input power. Input was still more than output combined. But this was grounded receivers Don showed "floating" receivers, basically just four identical coils one powered the others lighting neons which in my opinion prooved nothing much at all. The power required to light up one neon is tiny as can be seen in my video.

One transmitter two receivers. 17 minutes long. Some mumbling, these video's of mine were not produced for any other reason than to show other like minded people, I never expected to show them to convince anyone of anything. People have free minds to use as they please.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJd8TNC75AI

Just how I see it.

Cheers

[Google]

Dieter and farmhand,

Thanks 4 the replies.

● Back emf of the primary can be put to use by using a bifilar pancake primary coil, instead of blocking it with diodes. I just got 30 5408 diodes for the experiment but will use a bifilar for the primary. What do you guys think about it ?

● Instead of using the bifi in primary as one coil, we will split into two pancakes, one on top and the other on bottom, centre of top is connected to outer end of bottom panacke and centre of bottom and outer end of top become input.

● Secondary coils : Suppose we use 3 secondary coils, each in bifilar pancake configuration for pickup. There three pickup coils are sandwitched between the two split primaries.

● The primary and pickups have same resonant frequency, as per our design.

● After each pickup we have the same resonant step down trafo connected with bridge rectifier and dc caps to get the DC out.

● These 3 dc outs are connected in parallel go get higher current output at the fixed dc voltage.

● Instead of only 3 we can use 4,5,6 or more and see if the combined ouput increases with addition of each pickup.
   The pancake setup allows many pick up coils within the small space between two outer secondaries and keeps the     
    EMF well within reach of the pickups.

● We keep on adding pickups till output increase input.

★★  What do you say guys  ? Where do we use earth connection in this setup to pull extra charge ?

Please comment on each point separately.

Best,

[Google]

 

[Google]

. Since we are using back emf also, the output must be more than input. We are using energy of one kick but getting output of two kicks. These two kicks generate obviously bigger kicks in pickups, which inturn return part of kicks back to primary and their mutual kung fu at resonance decreases the input and increases the output.