I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device

[Google]

Dear dieter and famhand,

Back emf = counter emf = result of input and is definitely no free.

Think of damped waves oscillations instead of supplying the primary with a resonant (undamped wave oscillation). Damped wave oscillation gives huge explosive bursts of energy in milli/ micro/ nano seconds.

(Primary self resonance must = all secondary self resonance, for min energy consumtion or highest efficiency)

This momentary discharge by caps gives huge spikes of emf and back emf. Theses spikes of back emf are a result of energy supplied by us and are not free.

These huge spikes of back emf are successive to forward emf in every cycle.

Now here comes the exploitation of back emf : (I am theorising now, which needs validation)

Secondary 1 : Has a circuit at the output to capture almost full forward emf and feeds to a dc capacitor. The circuit is such that it doesnt capture back emf.
Secondary 2 : Has a circuit at the output to capture almost full reverse emf and feeds to another dc capacitor.this circuit is such that it doesnt capture forward emf.

In real time, first the forward emf is generated and captured almost say 95% with system losses and fed to cap.

Now the wave collapses and till its zero our cap is filled with energy of the forward wave. When the wave is collapsing forward emf dampens but simutaneously reverse emf wave amplitude increases.

Now comes the second pickup coil in picture. Second pick up coil captures only this counter emf, courtesy to the circuit connected to it and now feeds a second capacitor say with 5% system losses.


Now you have 2 caps filled up each with 95% of the inititially supplied energy say E, after the end of one cycle of emf and back emf in each completed oscillation of your damped wave oscillation.

As a result if you supplied 1 joule for creating one damped wave oscillation, you are in effect capturing 95% + 95 % by the end of one cycle. That equals 190 % total.

So input was 1 joule for each cycle but the output is 1.9 joule for each cycle.

Its upto us now how to design our output circuits of each secondary and how to design and place our primary and secondary to exploit this to our benefit.

It seems simple to think and understand to me but maybe I forgot to consider something, which may be added by you to develop on this theory or dump this theory.

This theory doesnt voilate laws of thermodynamics and there is no exotic aether involved either.

Best,

[Google]

I forgot to mention that our input is pulsing DC only.

Best,

[Google]

In the attached art Tesla probably very elusively describes turning back emf in "displacement current".

Will it lead to overunity  

Comments please.

Best,

[forest]

I believe so.    If only somebody could explain me why Lenz law is harshing the resonance in transformer setup when primary is joined to capacitor to form tank circuit. Yes, I know that the load on secondary change mutual inductance of core, but it ONLY an EXCUSE - we don't understand it step by step and that's the REAL difference between us and the real inventors.
Judging on the patents amount there is a way to eliminating Lenz law from the device.

[Google]

I believe so.    If only somebody could explain me why Lenz law is harshing the resonance in transformer setup when primary is joined to capacitor to form tank circuit. Yes, I know that the load on secondary change mutual inductance of core, but it ONLY an EXCUSE - we don't understand it step by step and that's the REAL difference between us and the real inventors.
Judging on the patents amount there is a way to eliminating Lenz law from the device.

You got me wrong, I want to use Lenz Law to be put to useful work. I want to add work done by my initial pulse and Lenz Law to combine and gimme higher output than input.