URGENT! WATER AS FUEL DISCOVERY FOR EVERYONE TO SHARE

[Damianos]

Thank you again.
I put the resistance to dicrease the intensity of the branch, because the  fighting works like a short circuit. So I have to protect the diodes.
The same can be happend with diode D4. We can put more than one diode to divide the voltage.
A capacitor of 10nF , over a diode , is not so much necessary but theoretically helps the diode to work better.
I did not yet make personally the experiment, but I think that the goal of plasma is to explode water.
This is a very good question of you, because I give two or three ways to use the lightning of the sparks (which comes from the ICE ignition) as a "cable".
We want this "cable" to use it as a "way" to pass the high intensity current through it, and to work "parallel" with the high voltage (of the ignition coil). In this way we believe, that we can see the plasma.
The point of this circuit is that we use the AC current of the Alternator (before its heavy diodes) as a AC source.

Thank you again

[gmeast]

Hey no problem, thank you for helping and thinking along. 

Why is the ohmic resisance needed?
Also, what I don't understand is, what is the function of a diode over a capacitor?

The goal the circuits posted here is to create a plasma discharge, but what is the goal of this plasma?
To better the ICE ignition process or to explode water? Or mix it and explode both?

Hi Alan,

In the original circuit, a resistor R1 limits the inrush current to CDI Cap C1 so as not to destroy voltage pump (oscillator / inverter) components .. enough resistance to adequately prevent damage but low enough to get a complete charge on C1.

Initially the goal was to just explode water. Find the original ,first, post in this thread by Gotoluc.  But first we want to see the effect of plasma with just fuels and ratios. Then we want to mix and explode both ... emulsion.  Also mix Hydroxy Gas in and ignite it, and more.  Final goal ... water as fuel.

Peace,

Greg

[revizal]

All,

(Resending my posting on energeticforum)

I've completed a test using 25 watt, 60 watt, and 100 watt bulb as resistor to see the effect on plasma booster. The higher the bulb's power the louder the effect and the bigger plasma result. Here is the video link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vM9RSA_rDR8

I hope this make a clear information about requirement of a restriction.

Revizal.

[Damianos]

If you allow me to make some questions please,
(Because I did not make yet the whole experiment, but I will make it soon , I hope)
When we use 100W bulb , do we get the maximum effect of the plasma or
in case we use 150W bulb , do we expect more "lightning of the plasma"? (or not).
Have these bulbs the same resistance between them or their resistance decreases by increasing the power consumption (Watts) of the bulbs?
The bulbs in your experiment use 110V voltage or 220V voltage?

Thank you 

[Damianos]

A more question please to all friends...

What is the reason (the need) to use high dc voltage (110V AC gives 155,56V DC  , also 220V AC gives 311,13V DC), when we want high intensity current to work parallel (and upstream?) with high voltage of the car coil?
Is there "a best combination" between  DC voltage and DC intensity that we "give" with Mr Greg's circuit?
Because if is not, then why don't we use many parallel diodes ( to have more intensity) from our battery "straight on" the car coil?

I am waiting for your opinions and ideas...
thank you