URGENT! WATER AS FUEL DISCOVERY FOR EVERYONE TO SHARE

[callanan]

I put the inverter on a seperate battery and it DIDN'T blow up!!    But now when I arc the plug a few times pretty fast the display on the inverter reads SC for short circuit. Maybe I just need to get a different brand of inverter.

Hi bumfuzzled,

As Ben suggested, connect a 110/240V household light globe directly in series with the output of your inverter which is also what appears to be shown in the capacitor70 video. I would use about a 100W light globe which should work as a simple resistive current regulator for your discharge circuit.

Regards,

Ossie

[DrStiffler]

No sarcasm, but ... WTF is "atm*x versus atm=1"?  Atmospheric Pressure? Please don't assume that everyone here has followed all your posts and knows what you are talking about ....

I'm seeking answers too - and my big unanswered questions are:

Why vapour?  If the energy comes from the latent heat of liquid water, then why not use water - and get the spark to turn the water into vapour, liberating the most energy?

Why compression?  That's applying existing ICE ideas to something that may not behave anything like an ICE.  AFAIK, lightening bolts in a storm cloud are in localised low pressure zones ... a depression weather event.

Why air?  Hydrocarbon fuels require oxygen, but water already contains oxygen.  And maybe the effect we want isn't the high temp disassociation of hydrogen & oxygen anyway (that would appear to require too much power input)? 

So is the ideal process Anaerobic?

I'm not wanting to muddy the waters - I really want to clarify the very essence of the overunity principle that is being tested here.  There will be many versions of working designs - but we need to understand the heart of the working principle ... there have been many false leads so far.

For example - can we safely consider that "special inverters" was a mistake/red-herring/mis-direction?

Thanks for the succinct response. I am now  assured its all under control and I will be of no help.

[resonanceman]

Why vapour?  If the energy comes from the latent heat of liquid water, then why not use water - and get the spark to turn the water into vapour, liberating the most energy?

In my opinion   vapor is the easy road .
If a motor  can be shown to run a little by dripping  water into the  intake  .......then    uncontroled  water into the intake  is  the right way to go .      .....................................

Personally  I don't think  there is  much  way to  control  the  process using  mist  .
Unless   control  can be found by manipulaing the  LV  current .
A motor  in a car  needs a high  degree of  control .


I think   that  injecting water  at the plug .........or in the plug    is the way  to  go.............
Making  the  first injector  plugs   will not  be   quick or easy .
I don't have the money to even start  the  process  right now

Why compression?  That's applying existing ICE ideas to something that may not behave anything like an ICE.  AFAIK, lightening bolts in a storm cloud are in localised low pressure zones ... a depression weather event.

I think that  compression   should work the same   with  a water motor .........   A  spark  in  a vacume  makes no   noise ...and can do no work .    It  only radiates  heat and light .
The  more  pressure   in the  cylinder  the more  work can  be done .

Why air?  Hydrocarbon fuels require oxygen, but water already contains oxygen.  And maybe the effect we want isn't the high temp disassociation of hydrogen & oxygen anyway (that would appear to require too much power input)? 

So is the ideal process Anaerobic?

I don't think that this process really needs  air ...........but it is kind of hard to get rid of .
and  I don't think it  is  hurting anything .






gary

[send_to_nice]

My turn to ask if I am missing something...

Am I missing something? Does a spark automatically imply that kinetic energy must also be being released in the form of expansion of gases? I know this forum is focussed on working on the spark, but says who that a spark will be of any use? Sure, we can make it bigger, but to me it's still just a spark.

That's why i keep suggesting we expand this to examine more than just the spark. I think we need to figure out if the spark can be used to do useful work for us. I don't know how many read my posts on here though.

[callanan]

My turn to ask if I am missing something...

Am I missing something? Does a spark automatically imply that kinetic energy must also be being released in the form of expansion of gases? I know this forum is focussed on working on the spark, but says who that a spark will be of any use? Sure, we can make it bigger, but to me it's still just a spark.

That's why i keep suggesting we expand this to examine more than just the spark. I think we need to figure out if the spark can be used to do useful work for us. I don't know how many read my posts on here though.

Hi send_to_nice,

I have read your posts. But I don't know if you have read all of my posts on here though from the beginning.

Regards,

Ossie