URGENT! WATER AS FUEL DISCOVERY FOR EVERYONE TO SHARE

[send_to_nice]

Please see my latest two "Proof Of Concept" videos here:

NICE work! Seeing that engine turn over, i was screaming out "yes!!". I've been one of the people in this thread nagging for someone to prove how much power this spark has in it, and I am now convinced.

As has been said in here earlier today, if what s1r says is true and a plasma arc of huge proportions is what we need in order to run an engine with enough power to move a vehicle (or do useful work), I now have total confidence that this thread - all about improving the spark - is the best thing this concept needs.

Thanks for demonstrating this, Ossie.

Richard

[DHCP]

Hi
First post, I have been interested in the whole concepts of this forum since I watched Equinox "it runs on water back in 95.
Any way there is far to much info on here for my little brain but I have been wondering the purpose of the vibrator relays shown in some of the circuit diagrams, would they be possible to create a multibal spark say from TDC to 3/4* ATDC the reason I thought of this was watching the vid  below forgive my ignorance but imagine that reaction at the degrease stated in the comp chamber?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bs-Uk511S_I
Not only that but his setup looks to me like a crude version of Stan Meyers water infecter
Keep up the great work
Regards to you all

[Ricardoch]

Hello all again,
As told some post before I worn out all my parts and waiting to restart with better protection, but there's something I think that maybe can help us all if possible to developp.

I used the hand switching between capacitor and coil approach. When succesful I changed to bigger capacitors to improve if possible the spark power, and sure it improved a little, enough to melt the plug.

Any case process is a little ticky, and the worse, it does not allow you to perform test in an easy and continuous way, at least for me, being a little impatient. (Sorry if English far from Shakespeare)


The question is:
As I am not able to design on my own a circuit to perform the pulses itself. Can you tell me if possible how to do or where to look for schemas for It?

I know signal generator and realys could do the trick, but those are not on my desk nor on everyone's budget, but I've seen some guys with more or less adjustable simple circuits that can change impulse rate as well as power pulses.

I think it could be very useful for everybody in order to look for the best parameters, as the ignition HV spark, low voltage power delivered through HV spark and so on, that at this moment I can test only once on every, hand-charge-capacitor-discharge-through-coil, hand-charge-capacitor-discharge-through-coil, melt-spark start over and so on...

Excuse my ignorance, there are more than 20 years I have to let away my very little electronic knowledge, (Knowledge?) and would most appreciate any help to build some kind of pulse automation to avoid wasting so much time in the tasks that have nothing to do with the real search.

Hope you can help.
Cheers.
Ri

[tinu]

The only problem I have with the idea that latent heat is being liberated in the process of converting liquid water to fog, is that under normal circumstances (e.g. evaporation), the latent heat quota of liquid water must be filled in order for the liquid to convert to a vapour state. That is, heat or other photonic energy is normally absorbed by the water (added to the water from an external source) for the conversion of liquid to vapour to occur. Latent heat energy is not released.

Latent heat is usually "liberated" when a vapour condenses back to a fluid, or a fluid is converted to solid. This is the opposite of what appears to be happening in the experiments shown.

The explanation given by Peter Graneau from Northeastern University Boston USA and Neal Graneau from Oxford University UK, is a little more involved than that, I know, but it still leaves me a little puzzled ?

Can anybody expand on the explanation given by Graneau. ? I am not disputing the explanation, but I am struggling to fully understand it.

Cheers all.

So am I and maybe a little more than that?
Have you seen my post on Graneau, at page 8?

Cheers,
Tinu

[alan]

Alan,
OK, then take your motor out of your car and put an electric motor in, or continue with this shortsided banter and keep paying $4.35 per gallon (and on the rise) for gasoline.

@geo,

@geo
Hi, don't get me wrong, what I meant was, if it is not OU, it cannot work, just like running a car on HHO gas alone (seen from an conservation of energy point). I hope this is OU and it looks like it will be found out very soon.
(some suggestions:
if the motor runs, do some torque and rpm measurements.
replicate a combustion chamber to study the explosive energy (also said before by another armchair) )

I hope I do add something valuable, if not, sorry for polluting this thread any further.